| Literature DB >> 35633950 |
Soon-Min Hong1,2, Wei Chen3, Jiaqi Feng2, Dai Dai1,2, Nan Shen1,2,4,5,6,7.
Abstract
Background: The study of genetic predisposition to pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus (pSLE) has brought new insights into the pathophysiology of SLE, as it is hypothesized that genetic predisposition is greater in children. Furthermore, identifying genetic variants and linking disrupted genes to abnormal immune pathways and clinical manifestations can be beneficial for both diagnosis and treatment. Here, we identified genetic alterations in a patient with childhood-onset SLE and analyzed the immunological mechanisms behind them to support future diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment.Entities:
Keywords: ACP5/TRAP; SAMHD1; bioinformatics; novel mutation; systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); whole-exome sequencing (WES)
Year: 2022 PMID: 35633950 PMCID: PMC9136231 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.885006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pediatr ISSN: 2296-2360 Impact factor: 3.569
Figure 1Identification of gene mutations in patient with pSLE. (A)The patient initially presented skin bleeding spots in both lower limbs. (B) Pedigrees showing affected probands and parents. Sanger sequencing confirmation of the c.1152G>T (p.Gly290Val), c.420G>A (p. Arg46Gln) at ACP5 (C) and c.1423G>A (p.Arg408His) at SAMHD1 (D) variant identified in our patient using exome sequencing. Chromatograms represent the reference (top) and the mutant sequence. The variant is indicated by the red arrow. (E) Top: Structure modeling of wild type and p.Gly290Val mutation of ACP5. Top left: Gly290 form H-bond with Ala309; Asn50 form H-bonds with Arg46 (Distance: 2.1Å) and Ala 260 (Distance: 2.8 Å). Top right: The mutant model shows the change of H-bonds, Asn50 form H-bonds with Gly261 (Distance: 2.1 Å) and Ala 260 (Distance: 2.4 Å). Bottom: Wild type and p.Arg46Gln mutation of ACP5. Bottom left: Arg46 form H-bonds with Ser288 (Distance: 1.8 Å and 2.3 Å). Bottom right: The mutant shows the loss of two H-bonds, this might lose the ability to form any polar interaction with other residues. (F) Wild type and p.Arg408His mutation of SAMHD1. Left: Arg408 form salt bridge with Asp394. Right: The mutant shows the loss of salt bridge with Asp394, and form H-bond with Ile397 (Distance: 2.3 Å). P, patient; P-M, mother; P-F, father.
Immune indices of patient.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| WBC (× 109/L) | 14.63↑ | 3.69–9.16 |
| Hb (g/L) | 137 | 113–151 |
| PLT (× 109/L) | 122 | 101–320 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 3.48 | 0–8 |
| ESR (mm/h) | 5 | 0–20 |
| PCT(ng/mL) | 0.280↑ | <0.05 |
| Anti-dsDNA(IU/mL) | 31.79↑ | 0–7.0 |
| ANA | 1:640 (+) | 0 |
| ANuA | 4.702 (+) | <1 |
| C3 (g/L) | 0.66↓ | 0.90–1.80 |
| C4 (g/L) | 0.06↓ | 0.10–0.40 |
| IgG (g/L) | 11.5 | 7.00–16.00 |
| IgA (g/L) | 0.31↓ | 0.70–4.00 |
| IgM (g/L) | 1.3 | 0.40–2.30 |
| IgE (IU/mL) | 308.47↑ | 1.31–165 |
| CD3+ (%) | 35.61↓ | 61.1–77 |
| CD4+ (%) | 19.78↓ | 25.8–41.6 |
| CD8+ (%) | 14.73↓ | 18.1–29.6 |
| CD16+ CD56+ (%) | 8.14↓ | 8.7–38.3 |
| CD19+ (%) | 57.46↑ | 4.7–19.3 |
| NK cytotoxic index (%) | 8.5↓ | 15–25 |
| AST(U/L) | 42↑ | 10–40 |
| ALT(U/L) | 22 | 0–75 |
| Urinary protein (mg/24h) | 45.1 | 31–120 |
| EBV-IgG (INDEX) | 6.07↑ | <1 |
| EBV-IgM (INDEX) | 0.08 | <1 |
| CMV-IgG (AU/mL) | 79 (+) | 0–6 |
| CMV-IgM (INDEX) | 0.32 | 0–1 |
↑, Increase; ↓, decrease; (+) positive.
Figure 2ACP5 mutations cause SPENCD and SAMHD1 mutations cause AGS both diseases clinically overlap with SLE, and both are associated with a spontaneous type I IFN response. (A) Summary of ACP5 mutation associated with SLE data. (B) Summary of SAMHD1 mutation associated with SLE data.
Cases of SPENCD associated with SLE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Female | 1152G>T/420G>A | G290V Het/R46Q Het | Yes (1:640) | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | NA | Yes | Yes | Yes | Prednisolone, HCQ and MMF | |
| 2 | Female | 369C>A/721G>A | Y123X Het/D241N Het | Yes (1:640) | Yes (1:320) | Yes | Yes | No | No | Class IV | Yes | No | Yes | ( | |
| 3 | Female | 791 T>A | M264K Hom | Yes (1:1280) | No | Yes | No | No | No | NA | No | No | No | ( | |
| 4 | Female | 643G>A | G215R Hom | Yes (1:1600) | Yes (>100) | Yes | No | No | Yes | Class V | Yes | No | Yes | ( | |
| 5 | Male | 325G>A/831 | G109R Het/Y278del Het | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | NA | No | Yes | No | Nivaquin and steroids | ( |
| 6 | Male | 791T>A | M264K Hom | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | No | Class V | Yes | No | No | ( | |
| 7 | NA | 325G>A | G109R Hom | No | No | No | No | No | No | NA | No | No | No | ( | |
| 8 | NA | 325G>A | G109R Hom | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | No | Class IV | Yes | No | No | ( | |
| 9 | NA | 155A>C | K52T Hom | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | NA | No | No | No | ( | |
| 10 | Male | 11,543,690-11,548,656 del | Ex5_7 del Hom | Yes (1:640) | Yes (>100) | Yes | Yes | No | No | Class III | Yes | Yes | Yes | Corticosteroids, CQ and CYC | ( |
| 11 | Male | NA | NA | Yes (1:640) | Yes (>100) | No | No | Yes | No | Class IV | Yes | No | Yes | Steroid,CYC,MMF and CQ | ( |
| 12 | Female | NA | NA | Yes (1:320) | Yes (>100) | NA | Yes | No | No | Class V | Yes | Yes | Yes | Steroid,CYC,AZA and CQ | ( |
| 13 | Female | NA | NA | Yes (1:320) | Yes (>100) | No | No | No | No | Class IV | Yes | Yes | Yes | Steroid,CYC and CQ | ( |
| 14 | Male | NA | NA | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | No | Steroid and nivaquine | ( |
| 15 | Female | 131C >T/816dupC | T44M Het/K272fs Het | Yes (1:1280) | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | NA | No | Yes | Yes | Steroid,MMF and intravenous Ig | ( |
| 16 | Female | NA | NA | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | NA | No | Yes | Yes | AZA and HCQ | ( |
| 17 | Male | 155A >C | K52T Hom | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | Class II | Yes | Yes | Yes | Prednisolone, AZA, HCQ and rituximab | ( |
| 18 | Male | NA | NA | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Class III | Yes | Yes | NA | ( | |
| 19 | Male | 449T>A/136C>T | V150E Het/R46W Het | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | Class IV | Yes | No | Yes | Piroxicam, prednisolone, AZA, gabapentin, topiramate, atenolol and enalapril | ( |
| 20 | Female | 449T>A/136C>T | V150E Het/R46W Het | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | NA | No | No | Yes | Corticosteroids and infliximab | ( |
| ]21 | Female | 550C>T/740T>G | Q184* Het/L247R Het | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | IgA nephropathy | Yes | No | No | Amlodipine, enalapril and labetalol | ( |
| 22 | Female | 369C >A/721G >A | Y123X Het/D241N Het | Yes (1:640) | Yes (1:320) | No | No | No | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | No | MMFand prednisolone | ( |
| 23 | Male | 266C > T | T89I Hom | Yes (1:640) | Yes (>100) | No | No | No | No | NA | Yes | Yes | No | AZA | ( |
| 24 | Female | 791 T>A | M264V Hom | Yes (1:1280) | Yes (>100) | Yes | No | No | Yes | NA | No | No | No | ( | |
| 25 | Female | 643G>A | G215R Hom | Yes (1:1600) | Yes (>100) | Yes | No | No | Yes | NA | Yes | No | No | Prednisolone, HCQ and MMF | ( |
| 26 | Male | 155 A>C/790 A>G | K52T Hom/M264V Het | Yes (1:100) | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | No | Prednisolone | ( |
| 27 | Male | 359 A>G | Q120R Hom | Yes (1:640) | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | NA | Yes | No | No | Prednisolone | ( |
| 28 | Male | 325G>A/712 T>C | G109R Het/C238R Het | Yes (1:640) | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | NA | Yes | No | No | ( | |
| 29 | Female | 131C>T/712 T>C | T44M Het/C238R Het | Yes (1:2560) | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | NA | No | No | No | ( | |
| 30 | Female | 798dupC/716G>A | S267Lfs*20 Het/G239D Het | Yes (1:320) | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | NA | No | No | Yes | Prednisolone and MMF | ( |
All cases had typical radiographic findings of SPENCD with short stature. Cases and 3, 8 and 9, and 13 and 14, were sib couples. NA, Not assessed/reported; ANA, antinuclear antibodies; LN, lupus nephritis; HCQ, Hydroxochloroquine; MMF, Mycophenolate mofetil; CQ, Chloroquine; CYC, Cyclophosphamide; AZA, Azathioprine.
Cases of SLE associated with mutation of SAMHD1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Female | 1423G>A | R408H Het | Yes (1:640) | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | NA | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Prednisolone,HCQ and MMF | |
|
| Male | NA | Yes (1:132) | Yes (>100) | Yes | No | Yes | No | NA | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | ( | |
|
| Male | NA | No | Yes (>100) | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | ( | |
|
| Female | NA | Yes (1:2,500) | Yes (1:140) | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | Prednisolone,AZA | ( | |
|
| Female | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | No | NA | NA | No | Yes | No | NA | ( | |
|
| Female | NA | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | NA | ( | |
|
| Male | 1642C>T/869G>A | Q548X Het/R290H Het | Yes (1:160) | Yes (1:40) | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | Topiramate, intrathecal baclofen, naproxen, etanercept, and prednisone. | ( |
|
| Female | 602T>A | I201N Het | No | No | No | No | No | No | NA | No | Yes | Yes | No | Nifedepine, HCQ | ( |
|
| Male | 602T>A | I201N Het | No | No | No | No | No | No | NA | No | Yes | Yes | No | Nifedepine, HCQ | ( |
Cases 5 and 6, 8 and 9 were sib couples. NA, Not assessed/reported; ANA, antinuclear antibodies; LN, lupus nephritis; HCQ, Hydroxochloroquine; MMF, Mycophenolate mofetil; AZA, Azathioprine.
Figure 3The potential regulation of ACP5 and SAMHD1 in SLE. The phenotype-gene relationship (A) and pathway analysis (B) were shown to be associated with immunity responses.
Figure 4Protein interaction networks of ACP5 and SAMHD1 have connections and a core cluster with significant connections with two networks. (A) Merge of ACP5 protein network (green) and SAMHD1 protein network (blue) with overlap nodes in both networks (orange). The size of nodes represents the degree and betweenness of nodes. (B) Left: The table outlines the degree, neighborhood connectivity, and closeness centrality values of the core cluster nodes. Right: Networks of core cluster in merge of ACP5 protein network and SAMHD1 protein network. The yellow nodes are the densely connected MCOD clusters, based on their parameters, including connectivity, degree, and centrality. (C) ClueGo analysis identifies KEGG pathways and biological processes linked to the essential proteins in the MCOD clusters.
Figure 5WES may help to analyze the potential pathogenesis of patients. Our findings suggest that the combinatorial complexity of polymorphisms in ACP5 and SAMHD1 coding regions impacts SLE susceptibility, and may contribute to the abnormal immune pathway in SLE. These mutations should be considered for potential precision therapy targeting specific pathways.