| Literature DB >> 35633660 |
Ming Chen1, Yujie He2, Dongyang Liu3, Lijin Tian3, Pengqi Xu1, Xuan Liu1, Yihang Pan1, Shuqi Dong2,4, Jun He2,4, Ying Zhang1.
Abstract
The diversity of photosystem oligomers is essential to understanding how photosynthetic organisms adapt to light conditions. Due to its structural and physiological significance, the assembly of the PSI supercomplex has been of great interest recently in terms of both chloroplast and cyanobacteria. In this study, two novel photosystem I supercomplexes were isolated for the first time from the low light incubated culture of filamentous cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. PCC 7120. These complexes were defined as PSI hexamers and octamers through biochemical and biophysical characterization. Their 77K emission spectra indicated that the red forms of chlorophylls seemed not to be affected during oligomerization. By cryo-EM single-particle analysis, a near-atomic (7.0 Å) resolution structure of a PSI octamer was resolved, and the molecular assemblies of a stable PSI octamer were revealed.Entities:
Keywords: cyanobacteria; hexamer; octamer; photosystem I; single particle
Year: 2022 PMID: 35633660 PMCID: PMC9130954 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.876122
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
Figure 1Biochemical (A) and biophysical (B–D) characterization of the PSI tetramer, supercomplex 1, and supercomplex 2. (a) Membrane crude extracts were loaded on BN-PAGE at a total amount of 9–12 μg chlorophyll a for each lane; (a) membrane crude extracts were loaded on sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation for the separation of PSI tetramer and supercomplexes. (B) Low temperature (77 k) fluorescence emission detection of PSI tetramer (red line), supercomplex 1 (blue line), and supercomplex 2 (purple line). (C) Negative staining electron microscopy image of PSI tetramer (c) supercomplex 1 (c) and supercomplex 2 (c). The yellow and red circles indicate the top and side views, respectively. The enlarged image in the right corner shows the 2D averages of the most contributed particles. (D) The average 2D model-fitted maps of the PSI tetramer (d) supercomplex 1 (d) and supercomplex 2 (d).
Figure 2The cryo-EM sample prep optimization and structure determination of PSI supercomplex 2. (A) Optimization of cryo-EM sample. (a) The protein particles were blotted immediately after sample loading; (a) detergent fos-coline-8 was supplemented into the protein sample at a final concentration of 1.0 mM around 5 s before blotting; (a) additional 3 s of waiting time were introduced between the loading and blotting of fos-choline-8 mixed sample. (B) Top (b) and side (b) views of the refined 3D density map of PSI supercomplex 2. (C) Model and map fitting for structure comparison of cyanobacterial PSI dimer and the supercomplex. Top (c) and side (c) views of model fitting of PSI dimer into the density map. The model used for fitting is a published PSI dimer structure (PDB code: 6K61) from Anabaena sp. PCC 7120.
Figure 3Structure details of PsaK-PsaK interaction in PSI octamer supercomplex. (A) Overall view of the interface location in the complex (top view from the stromal side). The original structure applied for fitting is the PSI tetramer model (PDB code: 6TCL) from Anabaena sp. PCC 7120. (B) Close-up view of structural details indicated in (B). The enlarged top view of two PsaK subunits from the assembled PSI tetramers (T1 and T2), the interacted amino acids were shown as stick form. (B) Tilted side view of interacted PsaK subunits. (B) The focus view of intact amino acids Lys52 and Phe53 in PsaK subunits.