Literature DB >> 35633388

Learning from the past: opportunities for advancing ecological research and practice using palaeoecological data.

Anne E Goodenough1, Julia C Webb2.   

Abstract

Palaeoecology involves analysis of fossil and sub-fossil evidence preserved within sediments to understand past species distributions, habitats and ecosystems. However, while palaeoecological research is sometimes made relevant to contemporary ecology, especially to advance understanding of biogeographical theory or inform habitat-based conservation at specific sites, most ecologists do not routinely incorporate palaeoecological evidence into their work. Thus most cross-discipline links are palaeoecology → ecology rather than ecology → palaeoecology. This is likely due to lack of awareness and/or the misnomer that palaeoecology invariably relates to the "distant past" (thousands of years) rather than being applicable to the "recent past" (last ~ 100-200 years). Here, we highlight opportunities for greater integration of palaeoecology within contemporary ecological research, policy, and practice. We identify situations where palaeoecology has been, or could be, used to (1) quantify recent temporal change (e.g. population dynamics; predator-prey cycles); (2) "rewind" to a particular point in ecological time (e.g. setting restoration/rewilding targets; classifying cryptogenic species); (3) understand current ecological processes that are hard to study real-time (e.g. identifying keystone species; detecting ecological tipping points); (4) complement primary data and historical records to bridge knowledge gaps (e.g. informing reintroductions and bioindicator frameworks); (5) disentangle natural and anthropogenic processes (e.g. climate change); and (6) draw palaeoecological analogues (e.g. impacts of pests). We conclude that the possibilities for better uniting ecology and palaeoecology to form an emerging cross-boundary paradigm are as extensive as they are exciting: we urge ecologists to learn from the past and seek opportunities to extend, improve, and strengthen their work using palaeoecological data.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conservation; Ecological management; Ecological monitoring; Spatiotemporal change

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35633388     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-022-05190-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  23 in total

1.  Mind the gap: how open were European primeval forests?

Authors:  H John B Birks
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 2.  Testing the assumptions of chronosequences in succession.

Authors:  Edward A Johnson; Kiyoko Miyanishi
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 9.492

3.  Diatom flickering prior to regime shift.

Authors:  Jacob Carstensen; Richard J Telford; H John B Birks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Ecological restoration in the light of ecological history.

Authors:  Stephen T Jackson; Richard J Hobbs
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Community ecology in a changing environment: Perspectives from the Quaternary.

Authors:  Stephen T Jackson; Jessica L Blois
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  A Critique of the Space-for-Time Substitution Practice in Community Ecology.

Authors:  Christian Damgaard
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  A deep-time perspective on the latitudinal diversity gradient.

Authors:  Philip D Mannion
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Revisiting Paine's 1966 Sea Star Removal Experiment, the Most-Cited Empirical Article in the American Naturalist.

Authors:  Kevin D Lafferty; Thomas H Suchanek
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Fisheries productivity in the northeastern Pacific Ocean over the past 2,200 years.

Authors:  Bruce P Finney; Irene Gregory-Eaves; Marianne S V Douglas; John P Smol
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-04-18       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Size differences of Arctic marine protists between two climate periods-using the paleoecological record to assess the importance of within-species trait variation.

Authors:  Erik A Mousing; Sofia Ribeiro; Chelsea Chisholm; Antoon Kuijpers; Matthias Moros; Marianne Ellegaard
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-11-27       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.