| Literature DB >> 35632345 |
Jialin Yan1,2, Jiangming Kan1,2, Haifeng Luo1,2.
Abstract
Data-driven rolling-bearing fault diagnosis methods are mostly based on deep-learning models, and their multilayer nonlinear mapping capability can improve the accuracy of intelligent fault diagnosis. However, problems such as gradient disappearance occur as the number of network layers increases. Moreover, directly taking the raw vibration signals of rolling bearings as the network input results in incomplete feature extraction. In order to efficiently represent the state characteristics of vibration signals in image form and improve the feature learning capability of the network, this paper proposes fault diagnosis model MTF-ResNet based on a Markov transition field and deep residual network. First, the data of raw vibration signals are augmented by using a sliding window. Then, vibration signal samples are converted into two-dimensional images by MTF, which retains the time dependence and frequency structure of time-series signals, and a deep residual neural network is established to perform feature extraction, and identify the severity and location of the bearing faults through image classification. Lastly, experiments were conducted on a bearing dataset to verify the effectiveness and superiority of the MTF-ResNet model. Features learned by the model are visualized by t-SNE, and experimental results indicate that MTF-ResNet showed better average accuracy compared with several widely used diagnostic methods.Entities:
Keywords: Markov transition field; intelligent fault diagnosis; residual network
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35632345 PMCID: PMC9145222 DOI: 10.3390/s22103936
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.847
Structure of residual networks.
| Layer Name | ResNet-18 | ResNet-34 | ResNet-50 | Output Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conv1 | 7 × 7, 64, stride 2 | 112 × 112 | ||
| Conv2_x | 3 × 3 max pool, stride 2 | 56 × 56 | ||
|
|
|
| ||
| Conv3_x |
|
|
| 28 × 28 |
| Conv4_x |
|
|
| 14 × 14 |
| Conv5_x |
|
|
| 7 × 7 |
| Average pool, fc, softmax | 1 × 1 | |||
Figure 1Residual building block.
Figure 2Process of data augmentation.
Figure 3Transformation process of Markov transition field.
Figure 4Architecture of the proposed MTF-ResNet model.
Detailed parameters of the MTF-ResNet model.
| Parameters | Value |
|---|---|
| Batch size | 32 |
| Optimizer | Adam |
| Lr | 0.0001 |
| Loss function | Category—cross-entropy |
Figure 5CWRU bearing test rig [32].
Working conditions studied in this work.
| Dataset | Motor Load (hp) | Motor Speed (r/min) |
|---|---|---|
| A | 1 | 1772 |
| B | 2 | 1750 |
| C | 3 | 1730 |
Composition of single working condition bearing fault data.
| Fault Type | Fault Diameter (Inch) | Number of Samples | Label |
|---|---|---|---|
| BF07 | 0.007 | 660/25 | 0 |
| BF14 | 0.014 | 660/25 | 1 |
| BF21 | 0.021 | 660/25 | 2 |
| IF07 | 0.007 | 660/25 | 3 |
| IF14 | 0.014 | 660/25 | 4 |
| IF21 | 0.021 | 660/25 | 5 |
| NC | 0 | 660/25 | 6 |
| OF07 | 0.007 | 660/25 | 7 |
| OF14 | 0.014 | 660/25 | 8 |
| OF21 | 0.021 | 660/25 | 9 |
Composition of bearing fault data under variable working conditions (Dataset D).
| Fault Type | Fault Diameter (Inch) | Motor Load (hp) | Label |
|---|---|---|---|
| NC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| IF07 | 0.007 | 1 | 1 |
| BF14 | 0.014 | 2 | 2 |
| OF21 | 0.021 | 3 | 3 |
Figure 6Transformation of the same signal containing 2048 data points into MTF images of image sizes of (a) 2048 × 2048, (b) 224 × 224, and (c) 64 × 64.
Figure 7Confusion matrixes for each dataset: (a) Dataset A; (b) Dataset B; (c) Dataset C; (d) Dataset D.
Figure 8Feature visualization by t-SNE for each dataset: (a) Dataset A; (b) Dataset B; (c) Dataset C; (d) Dataset D.
Figure 9Feature visualization of different layers of the proposed MTF-ResNet. (a) First convolutional layer; (b) 13th convolutional layer; (c) 23rd convolutional layer; (d) fully connected layer.
Average classification accuracy of different residual structures.
| Network | Epoch | Accuracy (%) |
|---|---|---|
| ResNet-18 | 100 | 94.12 |
| ResNet-34 | 100 | 98.52 |
| ResNet-50 | 100 | 96.44 |
Experimental results of different methods.
| Methods | Categories | Accuracy (%) |
|---|---|---|
| VI-CNN [ | 4 | 100 |
| STFT-CNN [ | 4 | 99.4 |
| Compact 1D-CNN [ | 6 | 93.2 |
| IDSCNN [ | 10 | 93.84 |
| CNNEPDNN [ | 10 | 97.85 |
| Proposed | 4 | 100 |