| Literature DB >> 35632177 |
Ying Tao1,2, Sumin Bian2, Pengbo Wang2, Hongyong Zhang2, Wenwen Bi3,4, Peixi Zhu1, Mohamad Sawan2.
Abstract
Tests for SARS-CoV-2 are crucial for the mass surveillance of the incidence of infection. The long waiting time for classic nucleic acid test results highlights the importance of developing alternative rapid biosensing methods. Herein, we propose a fiber-optic biolayer interferometry-based biosensor (FO-BLI) to detect SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins, extracellular domain (ECD), and receptor-binding domain (RBD) in artificial samples in 13 min. The FO-BLI biosensor utilized an antibody pair to capture and detect the spike proteins. The secondary antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) reacted with the enzyme substrate for signal amplification. Two types of substrates, 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB) and an advanced 3-Amino-9-ethylcarbazole (i.e., AMEC), were applied to evaluate their capabilities in enhancing signals and reaching high sensitivity. After careful comparison, the AMEC-based FO-BLI biosensor showed better assay performance, which detected ECD at a concentration of 32-720 pM and RBD of 12.5-400 pM in artificial saliva and serum, respectively. The limit of detection (LoD) for SARS-CoV-2 ECD and RBD was defined to be 36 pM and 12.5 pM, respectively. Morphology of the metal precipitates generated by the AMEC-HRP reaction in the fiber tips was observed using field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Collectively, the developed FO-BLI biosensor has the potential to rapidly detect SARS-CoV-2 antigens and provide guidance for "sample-collect and result-out on-site" mode.Entities:
Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; biosensor; fiber-optic biolayer interferometry; rapid detection; signal amplification; spike proteins
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35632177 PMCID: PMC9146222 DOI: 10.3390/s22103768
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.847
Figure 1(A) The structure of SARS-CoV-2. The FO-BLI biosensor principle and detection flowchart. (B) Schematic illustration of the detection flowchart, the sandwich-based assay principle, and the oxidation reaction for signal enhancement on top of a fiber tip. (C) Scheme of the reaction between DAB with the HRP enzyme.
Figure 2(A) Evaluation of the dilution factor of the precipitating agent AMEC on ECD detecting. (B,C) Nonlinear binding curve of ECD detection (36–720 pM) in high-salt SD buffer using DAB and AMEC, respectively. (D) Measurements of six concentrations of pseudovirus based on DAB-based FO-BLI and AMEC-based FO-BLI, respectively.
Comparison of AMEC and DAB-based FO-BLI biosensors for SARS-CoV-2 detection.
| Items | AMEC Based FO-BLI Biosensor | DAB Based FO-BLI Biosensor |
|---|---|---|
| Signal enhancer | AMEC | DAB |
| Detection range for ECD in buffer | 36–720 pM | 36–720 pM |
| LoD for pseudovirus | 6 × 107 | 2 × 107 |
| Sample-to-result time | 13 min | 13 min |
| Signal-to-noise ratio | 14.6 | 7.4 |
| Stability of enhancer solution | Up to 14 days | 30 min |
| Color of precipitate | Red | Brown |
| Environmental and human friendliness |
▪ Causes serious eye irritation; ▪ No need for a fume hood to operate |
▪ May cause cancer and damage to organs; ▪ Toxic to aquatic life with long-lasting effects; ▪ Need for fume hood to operate; |
| Solubility of precipiate |
▪ Insoluble in water but soluble in alcohols and DMF |
▪ Insoluble in water and other solvents |
Figure 3Evaluation of the cross-reactivities and the effect of sample matrix for the AMEC-based FO-BLI biosensors. (A) Evaluation of the assay cross-reactivity towards SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2, and MERS; (B) Evaluation of the effect of dilution of serum and saliva on RBD measurement.
Figure 4Performance of the AMEC-based FO-BLI biosensor for SARS-CoV-2 RBD and ECD detection in spiked saliva and serum. (A) Nonlinear binding curve of ECD detection (36–1152 pM) in high-salt diluted saliva (2-fold) and serum (2-fold); (B) Nonlinear binding curve of RBD detection (12.5–400 pM) in high-salt diluted saliva (2-fold) and serum (2-fold).
Comparison of performance of the optical biosensors reported in literature and this work for SARS-CoV-2 detection.
| Target | Recognition Element | Analytical | Time | Substrate | Signal Transducer | Automated | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBD | ACE2 | 12.5 nM | 5 s | Carbon Nanotube | Near-Infrared | No | [ |
| RBD | Aptamer | 37 nM | 10 min | D-shaped plastic fiber | SPR | No | [ |
| RBD | Antibody | 1 pM | 3 s | Au/Ag nanostructures | Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy | No | [ |
| RBD | ACE2 | 10 pM | 30 min | Gold nanoparticles | Colorimetric sandwich bioassay | No | [ |
| Omicron | Antibody | More sensitive than PCR | 15 min | Plastic fiber | Refractive index variation | No | [ |
| RBD | Antibody | 33 pM | 5 min | Gold | Microcantilever | No | [ |
| SARS-CoV-2 sequences | Aptamer | 0.22 pM | >25 min | 2D gold nanoislands | LSPR | No | [ |
| S protein | MIP | 58,000 pM | 10 min | D-shaped plastic fiber | SPR | No | [ |
| RBD, ECD | Antibody | 12.5 pM, 36 pM | 13 min | Optical fiber | BLI | Yes | This work |
ACE2, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; BLI, biolayer interferometry; ECD, extracellular domain; LoD, the limit of detection; LSPR, localized surface plasmon resonance; MIP, molecularly imprinted polymers; RBD, receptor-binding domain; SPR, surface plasmon resonance.
Figure 5Generation and characterization of the AMEC-induced red precipitates on the optical fiber tips. (A–D) SEM images of the optical fiber tips when submerged into AMEC solution to react with HRP bonded on the second antibody to attain signals up to 1.4 nm (A,B) and 16 nm (C,D).