| Literature DB >> 35632003 |
Gyuri Kim1, Pranabesh Sahu1, Jeong Seok Oh1.
Abstract
High-damping rubber composites were prepared by mixing ethylene propylene diene monomer rubber (EPDM) with slide-ring (SR) materials using a two-roll mill, followed by a compression molding technique. SR material has a novel supramolecular structure with unique softness and slidable crosslink junctions. The mechanical strength, thermal stability, compression set property, and damping performance of the composites were investigated. The use of the high damping SR phase dispersed in the EPDM matrix displayed improved physical properties and damping performance compared to those of virgin rubber. As SR content increases in the composites, the damping factor of SR/EPDM blends becomes higher at room temperature. In addition to this, the SR composites showed excellent improvements in the compression set properties. The composites showed a compression set improvement of 35-38% compared to virgin EPDM. These improvements are due to the "pulley effect" of slide-ring materials. Therefore, these materials present a robust platform for making novel elastomer composites for high-performance damping and sealing applications.Entities:
Keywords: compression set; mechanical properties; rubber composites; slide-ring material
Year: 2022 PMID: 35632003 PMCID: PMC9148087 DOI: 10.3390/polym14102121
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Figure 1Structure of the slide-ring material. Reprinted from [13] with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 2Schematics of ”Pulley effect” in slide-ring material-based composites before and after stretching.
Typical compounding formulation of SR/EPDM composites.
| Ingredients | Contents (phr) a |
|---|---|
| EPDM | 100 |
| SR | 0, 5, 10, and 15 |
| Zinc Oxide | 5.0 |
| Stearic acid | 1.0 |
| 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole (MBT) | 0.5 |
| Tetramethyl thiuram disulfide (TMTD) | 1.0 |
| Sulfur | 1.5 |
a phr: parts per hundred parts of rubber by weight.
Figure 3Schematic illustration of rubber composites’ formation using dynamic vulcanization.
Figure 4Compression set of SR/EPDM composites with varying SR contents.
Compression set values of SR/EPDM composites.
| SR Contents | % of C-Set Improvement |
|---|---|
| 0 phr | ----- |
| 5 phr | 35.6 |
| 10 phr | 36.8 |
| 15 phr | 38.0 |
phr: parts per hundred parts of rubber.
Figure 5(a) Temperature dependence of tan δ and (b) variation of tan δ with dynamic frequency sweep for SR/EPDM composites.
Figure 6(a) Tensile strength; and (b) Elongation at break of SR/EPDM composites with different SR contents.
Figure 7Thermogravimetric analysis of the SR/EPDM composites.