| Literature DB >> 35631854 |
Asril Soekoco1,2, Ateeq Ur Rehman3, Ajisetia Fauzi1, Hamdi Tasya1, Purnama Diandra1, Islami Tasa1, Brian Yuliarto2.
Abstract
Thermal signature reduction in camouflage textiles is a vital requirement to protect soldiers from detection by thermal imaging equipment in low-light conditions. Thermal signature reduction can be achieved by decreasing the surface temperature of the subject by using a low thermally conductive material, such as polycarbonate, which contains bisphenol A. Polycarbonate is a hard type of plastic that generally ends up in dumps and landfills. Accordingly, there is a large amount of polycarbonate waste that needs to be managed to reduce its drawbacks to the environment. Polycarbonate waste has great potential to be used as a material for recycled fibre by the melt spinning method. In this research, polycarbonate roofing-sheet waste was extruded using a 2 mm diameter of spinnerette and a 14 mm barrel diameter in a 265 °C temperature process by using a lab-scale melt spinning machine at various plunger and take-up speeds. The fibres were then inserted into 1 × 1 rib-stitch knitted fabric made by Nm 15 polyacrylic commercial yarns, which were manufactured by a flat knitting machine. The results showed that applying recycled polycarbonate fibre as a fibre insertion in polyacrylic knitted fabric reduced the emitted infrared and thermal signature of the fabric.Entities:
Keywords: camouflage textiles; polycarbonate waste; recycled fibre; thermal signature
Year: 2022 PMID: 35631854 PMCID: PMC9143341 DOI: 10.3390/polym14101972
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Figure 1Schematic diagram of lab-scale melt spinning machine.
Figure 2IR absorption spectrum of multiwall roofing-sheet waste.
Figure 3(a) Recyled polycarbonate fibre; (b) 0% Polycarbonate–100% Polyacrylic fabric; (c) 50% Polycarbonate–50% Polyacrylic; (d) 66.7% Polycarbonate–33.3% Polyacrylic.
Figure 4Correlation of plunger speed and take-up speed with polycarbonate fibre diameter.
Figure 5Change of molecular orientation in the take-up process.
Figure 6Correlation of plunger speed and take-up speed with polycarbonate fibre tenacity.
Figure 7The areal density of polycarbonate–polyacrylic fabrics.
Figure 8Bursting strength of polycarbonate–polyacrylic fabrics.
Figure 9Thermography of knitted fabric: (a) 0% Polycarbonate–100% Polyacrylic on 40 °C; (b) 50% Polycarbonate–50% Polyacrylic on 40 °C; (c) 66.7% Polycarbonate–33.3% Polyacrylic on 40 °C; (d) 0% Polycarbonate–100% Polyacrylic on 68 °C; (e) 50% Polycarbonate–50% Polyacrylic on 68 °C; (f) 66.7% Polycarbonate–33.3% Polyacrylic on 68 °C; (g) 0% Polycarbonate–100% Polyacrylic on 100 °C; (h) 50% Polycarbonate–50% Polyacrylic on 100 °C; (i) 66.7% Polycarbonate–33.3% Polyacrylic on 100 °C.
Figure 10Surface temperature reduction in various polycarbonate-content fabrics.