| Literature DB >> 35631844 |
Petronela Nechita1, Silviu Marian Năstac2.
Abstract
Wet foam can be used as a carrier in the manufacturing of lightweight materials based on natural and man-made fibers and specific additives. Using a foam forming method and cellulose fibers, it is possible to produce the porous materials with large area of end-using such as protective and cushioning packaging, filtering, hydroponic, thermal and sound absorption insulation, or other building materials. In comparison with the water-forming used for conventional paper products, foam-forming method provides many advantages. In particular, since fibers inside the foam are mostly trapped between the foam bubbles, the formed materials have an excellent homogeneity. This allows for using long fibers and a high consistency in head box without significant fiber flocking. As result, important savings in water and energy consumptions for dewatering and drying of the foam formed materials are obtained. In cushioning packaging, foam-formed cellulose materials have their specific advantages comparing to other biodegradable packaging (corrugated board, molded pulp) and can be a sustainable alternative to existing synthetic foams (i.e., expanded polystyrene or polyurethane foams). This review discusses the technical parameters to be controlled during foam forming of cellulose materials to ensure their performances as cushioning and protective packaging. The focus was on the identification of practical solutions to compensate the strength decreasing caused by reduced density and low resistance to water of foam formed cellulose materials.Entities:
Keywords: cellulose fibers; cushioning; foam forming; packaging; strength; surfactant
Year: 2022 PMID: 35631844 PMCID: PMC9143679 DOI: 10.3390/polym14101963
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
The packaging performance of cellulose materials vs petroleum-based alternatives.
| Molded Pulp | Foam Formed | Corrugated Board | Plastic Foams (eps) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Material | Wood/plant cellulose fibers/recycled fibers/waste | Wood/plant cellulose fibers/recycled fibers/waste | Wood/plant cellulose fibers/recycled fibers | Petroleum based |
| Sustainability | Recyclable/biodegradable/ | Recyclable/biodegradable/ | Recyclable/biodegradable/compostable | Non-biodegradable |
| Cushioning performance | Excellent vibration and cushioning properties | Excellent vibration and cushioning properties | Inconsistent vibration and cushioning properties | Good vibration and cushioning properties |
| Shipping and storage | Easily nests [ | Easily nests [ | Require labor and assembly | Does not nest [ |
| Climate tolerance | Is not affected by extreme external conditions | Not affected by extreme temperature | Humidity affects | Temperature |
| Durability and mechanical strength | Good | Can be improved by refining of cellulose fibers [ | Good | High mechanical; strength and durability |
| Price | High | Low | Low | High |
Figure 1Overview on the area of application of foam formed cellulose materials.
Figure 2Comparison between foam forming and water forming processes.
Figure 3Cellulose materials from recycled fibers: water forming (left); foam forming (right).
Water vs foam formed cellulose materials.
| Water Formed | Foam Formed | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wet formation | High fibers flocculation | The foam prevents the flocculation of fibers. | Radvan et al. [ |
| Low consistency of pulp suspension in head box | High consistency of pulp suspension in head box | Punton et al. [ | |
| High water and drying energy consumptions | Economy of water and energy drying consumptions | ||
| Structure of fibrous network | High density materials with 2D structure | Lightweight and low-density materials with 3D structure | Punton et al. [ |
| The compression behavior | Denser materials with low recovery after compression | Bulking structure with better recovery after compression | Jarvinen et al. [ |
| Fibrous raw materials | Cellulose fibers (bleached/unbleached pulp, secondary cellulose fibers) | Flexible long fibers, man-made fibers, recycled papers, lignocellulose agro-wastes | Nechita et al. [ |
Figure 4The effect of refining process on the structure and mechanical integrity of cellulose foam materials. (a) appearance of foam formed cellulose materials without refining; (b) appearance of foam formed cellulose materials after refining at 60°SR.
Figure 5The influence of fiber length on the structure of foam formed cellulose materials. (a) water formed material from 100% hardwood pulp, fibre length = 1.0 mm; (b) foam formed material from 100% hardwood pulp, fibre length = 1.0 mm; (c) foam formed material from 100% softwood pulp, fibre length = 2.3 mm; (d) foam formed material from 80% softwood pulp + 20% Lyocell, fibre length = 3.0 mm.
Figure 6Internal structure of foam formed cellulose materials with high recycled fibers content. (a) Foam formed materials from 100% bleached cellulose fibers; (b) foam formed materials from 100% recycled cellulose fibers; (c) foam formed materials from 50% bleached cellulose fibers+50% recycled cellulose fibers; (d) water formed materials from 100% recycled fibers.
Figure 7Shock absorption properties of foam formed cellulose materials. (a) Experimental setup used for impact tests; (b) restoring coefficient; (c) sample deformation, [mm]. EPS, expanded polystyrene foam; HDPU, high density polyurethane foam; Sample A, foam formed materials from 100% bleached cellulose fibers; Sample B, foam formed materials from 100% recycled cellulose fibers.
Figure 8Cellulose fibers in foam. The fiber-foam bubbles contacts at high charge of surfactant. Re-print according to ref. [90].