| Literature DB >> 35631759 |
Kostas Ioannidis1, Ioanna Tomprou2, Vangelis Mitsis2.
Abstract
An alternative in vitro propagation protocol for medical Cannabis sativa L. cultivars for pharmaceutical industrial use was established. The aim of the protocol was to reduce the culture time, offering healthy and aseptic propagating material, while making the whole process more economic for industrial use. The propagation procedure was performed using plastic autoclavable vented and non-vented vessels, containing porous rooting fine-milled sphagnum peat moss-based sponges, impregnated in ½ Murashige and Skoog liquid growth medium, supplemented with indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) at various concentrations (0, 2.46, 4.92, and 9.84 µM) or by dipping nodal cuttings into 15 mM IBA aqueous solution. The highest average root numbers per cutting, 9.47 and 7.79 for high cannabidiol (H_CBD) and high cannabigerol (H_CBG) varieties, respectively, were achieved by dipping the cuttings into IBA aqueous solution for 4 min and then placing them in non-vented vessels. The maximum average root length in H_CBD (1.54 cm) and H_CBG (0.88 cm) was ascertained using 2.46 μM filter sterilized IBA in non-vented vessels. Filter-sterilized IBA at concentrations of 2.46 μM in vented and 4.92 μM in non-vented vessels displayed the maximum average rooting percentages in H_CBD (100%) and H_CBG (95.83%), respectively. In both varieties, maximum growth was obtained in non-vented vessels, when the medium was supplemented with 4.92 μM filter-sterilized IBA. Significant interactions between variety and vessel type and variety and IBA treatments were observed in relation to rooting traits. Approximately 95% of plantlets were successfully established and acclimatized in field. This culture system can be used not only for propagating plant material at an industrial scale but also to enhance the preservation and conservation of Cannabis genetic material.Entities:
Keywords: hemp; in vitro culture; rooting peat-based sponges; shortening in vitro process; vented and non-vented vessels
Year: 2022 PMID: 35631759 PMCID: PMC9146626 DOI: 10.3390/plants11101333
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1New growth of established cuttings in rooting peat-based sponges in non-vented (a) and vented (b) vessels.
Figure 2Root formation of cuttings in non-vented (a) and vented (b) vessels.
The effect of IBA treatments and concentrations on the average number and length of roots per cutting and the rooting percentage of the high-CBD Cannabis sativa L. variety.
| Vessel Type | Treatment Concentration | Average Root Number per Cutting | Average Root Length (cm) | Average Rooting Percentage (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-vented | IBA autoclaved with the medium | 2.46 μM | 3.56 fgh | 0.73 cde | 66.67 bc |
| 4.92 μM | 6.29 de | 1.02 bc | 87.50 ab | ||
| 9.84 μM | 4.35 fg | 0.72 cde | 70.83 bc | ||
| IBA filter-sterilized | 2.46 μM | 2.97 gh | 1.54 a | 79.09 abc | |
| 4.92 μM | 7.18 cd | 1.51 a | 87.50 ab | ||
| 9.84 μM | 4.79 fg | 0.86 cd | 79.17 abc | ||
| Dipping treatment | 2 min | 8.75 ab | 0.66 ef | 83.33 ab | |
| 4 min | 9.47 a | 0.57 ef | 79.17 abc | ||
| 6 min | 5.53 ef | 0.71 cde | 79.17 abc | ||
| Control | 2.62 h | 0.63 ef | 54.17 c | ||
| Vented | IBA autoclaved with the medium | 2.46 μM | 2.85 h | 0.64 ef | 72.22 bc |
| 4.92 μM | 3.56 fgh | 0.53 ef | 88.89 ab | ||
| 9.84 μM | 3.08 gh | 0.58 ef | 72.22 bc | ||
| IBA filter-sterilized | 2.46 μM | 3.69 fgh | 1.21 b | 100.00 a | |
| 4.92 μM | 4.56 fg | 0.97 bc | 94.44 ab | ||
| 9.84 μM | 3.00 gh | 0.65 ef | 72.22 bc | ||
| Dipping treatment | 2 min | 7.59 bcd | 0.64 ef | 94.44 ab | |
| 4 min | 8.27 bc | 0.55 ef | 93.75 ab | ||
| 6 min | 4.07 fgh | 0.58 ef | 77.78 abc | ||
| Control | 3.10 gh | 0.50 f | 55.56 c | ||
IBA: indole-3-butyric acid, Control: no IBA addition. Means followed by the same letter do not differ statistically at p ≤ 0.05 according to the Duncan test.
The effect of IBA treatments and concentrations on the average number and length of roots per cutting and rooting percentage of the high-CBG Cannabis sativa L. variety.
| Vessel Type | Treatment Concentration | Average Root Number per Cutting | Average Root Length (cm) | Average Rooting Percentage (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-vented | IBA autoclaved with the medium | 2.46 μM | 3.76 f | 0.74 abcd | 70.83 bcd |
| 4.92 μM | 5.13 de | 0.86 ab | 95.83 a | ||
| 9.84 μM | 3.43 f | 0.70 bcd | 87.50 abs | ||
| IBA filter-sterilized | 2.46 μM | 3.86 f | 0.81 abc | 87.50 abc | |
| 4.92 μM | 5.26 cd | 0.88 a | 95.83 a | ||
| 9.84 μM | 4.05 ef | 0.71 bcd | 87.50 abc | ||
| Dipping treatment | 2 min | 6.90 ab | 0.83 abc | 83.33 abc | |
| 4 min | 7.79 a | 0.77 abc | 79.17 abc | ||
| 6 min | 5.88 bcd | 0.62 ef | 66.67 bcd | ||
| Control | 3.29 f | 0.47 gh | 58.33 de | ||
| Vented | IBA autoclaved with the medium | 2.46 μM | 3.36 f | 0.65 cde | 61.11 cde |
| 4.92 μM | 3.88 f | 0.60 efg | 94.44 ab | ||
| 9.84 μM | 3.64 f | 0.59 fg | 77.78 abc | ||
| IBA filter-sterilized | 2.46 μM | 3.63 f | 0.72 bcd | 88.89 ab | |
| 4.92 μM | 4.19 def | 0.68 cd | 88.89 ab | ||
| 9.84 μM | 3.29 f | 0.66 cde | 77.78 abc | ||
| Dipping treatment | 2 min | 6.24 bc | 0.72 bcd | 94.44 ab | |
| 4 min | 6.75 ab | 0.61 efg | 88.89 abc | ||
| 6 min | 6.42 bc | 0.49 gh | 66.67 bcd | ||
| Control | 3.00 f | 0.37 h | 50.00 de | ||
IBA: indole-3-butyric acid, Control: no IBA addition. Means followed by the same letter do not differ statistically at p ≤ 0.05 according to the Duncan test.
The effects of IBA treatments and concentrations on cutting growth of the high-CBD plants and high-CBG Cannabis sativa L. varieties.
| Type of Vessel | Treatment Concentration (μΜ) | Length (cm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High-CBD Plants | High_CBG Plants | |||
| Non-vented | IBA autoclaved with the medium | 2.46 μM | 0.82 cde | 0.98 cde |
| 4.92 μM | 1.42 ab | 1.50 ab | ||
| 9.84 μM | 1.14 bcd | 1.11 bcde | ||
| IBA filter-sterilized | 2.46 μM | 0.95 cde | 1.23 abcd | |
| 4.92 μM | 1.59 a | 1.60 a | ||
| 9.84 μM | 1.18 bc | 1.12 bcde | ||
| Dipping treatment | 2 min | 1.43 ab | 1.34 abc | |
| 4 min | 0.71 def | 0.83 def | ||
| 6 min | 1.12 bcd | 0.75 ef | ||
| Control | No PGR | 0.61 efg | 0.73 ef | |
| Vented | IBA autoclaved with the medium | 2.46 μM | 0.64 ef | 0.84 def |
| 4.92 μM | 1.17 bc | 1.13 bcd | ||
| 9.84 μM | 0.72 def | 0.85 def | ||
| IBA filter-sterilized | 2.46 μM | 0.82 cde | 1.00 cde | |
| 4.92 μM | 1.31 ab | 1.24 abc | ||
| 9.84 μM | 1.03 cd | 0.87 def | ||
| Dipping treatment | 2 min | 0.73 def | 1.18 bcd | |
| 4 min | 0.52 g | 0.96 cde | ||
| 6 min | 0.65 ef | 0.96 cde | ||
| Control | 0.54 fg | 0.57 g | ||
IBA: indole-3-butyric acid, Control: no IBA addition. Means followed by the same letter do not differ statistically at p ≤ 0.05 according to the Duncan test.
Figure 3Well-rooted cuttings placed in peat–perlite mixture for acclimatization (a) and fully acclimatized Cannabis sativa L. plant (b).
The treatments used in the experiments. The used medium was the half-strength MS.
| Variety | Treatment Concentration | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| IBA Autoclaved with the Medium | IBA Filter Sterilized | Dipping Treatment 15 mM IBA | |
| High-CBD plants | Control | Control | Control |
| 2.46 μM | 2.46 μM | 2 min | |
| 4.92 μM | 4.92 μM | 4 min | |
| 9.84 μM | 9.84 μM | 6 min | |
| High-CBG plants | Control | Control | Control |
| 2.46 μM | 2.46 μM | 2 min | |
| 4.92 μM | 4.92 μM | 4 min | |
| 9.84 μM | 9.84 μM | 6 min | |