| Literature DB >> 35631704 |
Syed Atif Hasan Naqvi1, Shehzad Iqbal2, Umar Farooq1, Muhammad Zeeshan Hassan1, Muhammad Nadeem Shahid1, Adnan Noor Shah3, Aqleem Abbas4, Iqra Mubeen5, Ammara Farooq6, Rehab Y Ghareeb7, Hazem M Kalaji8,9, Abdulwahed Fahad Alrefaei10, Mohamed A A Ahmed11.
Abstract
Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) is a global cash crop which has gained importance in earning foreign exchange for each country. Bacterial blight caused by Xanthomonascitri subsp. malvacearum (Xcm) has been a seriousdisease in Pakistan's cotton belt on multiple occasions. Bacterium was isolated and identified through various biochemical and diagnostic tests wherehypersensitivity reaction, Gram staining, KOH (potassium hydroxide), catalase, starch hydrolysis, lecithinase and Tween 80 hydrolysis tests confirmed bacterium as Gram-negative and plant pathogenic. Xcm perpetuation assays wereevaluated on various cotton varieties under glasshouse conditions in completely randomized design by three different methods, wherein the scratch method proved to be the best upon CIM-496 and showed 83.33% disease incidence as compared with the other two methods, where Bt-3701 responded with 53.33% incidence via the spray gun method, and 50% with the water splash method on CIM-616, as compared with the control. Similarly, for disease severity percentage, Bt-3701 was pragmatic with 47.21% through scratch method, whereas, in the spray gun method, 45.51% disease severity was noted upon Bt-802, and 31.27% was calculated on Cyto-179 through the water splash method. Owing to the unique antibacterial properties of aqueous plant extracts, the poison food technique showed Aloe vera, Mentha piperita, Syzygiumcumini and Azadirachta indica with 17.77, 29.33, 18.33 and 20.22 bacterial colonies counted on nutrient agarmedium petri plate, respectively, as compared with the control. Measurement of the inhibition zone by disk diffusion technique showed Mentha piperita, Syzygiumcumini, Citrus limon, Moringa oleifera and Syzygium aromaticum to present the most promising results by calculating the maximum diameter of the inhibition zone, viz., 8.58, 8.55, 8.52, 8.49 and 8.41 (mm), respectively, at the highest tested concentration (75 ppm, parts per million) compared with the control. It is probable that the decoction's interaction with the pathogen population on the host plant will need to be considered in future experiments. However, at this moment, more research into the effective management of cotton bacterial blight by plant extracts in terms of concentration determination and development of biopesticides will provide future avenues to avoid environmental pollution.Entities:
Keywords: Gossypium hirsutum; bacterium; biological control; in vitro; infection; pathology
Year: 2022 PMID: 35631704 PMCID: PMC9147663 DOI: 10.3390/plants11101278
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Identification of Xcm through biochemical and diagnostic tests on nutrient agar medium and indicator plant.
| Sr. No. | Diagnostic/Biochemical Test | Reaction | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Hypersensitivity response | +ive | Necrotic spots |
| 2. | Gram staining | −ive | Pink color retained |
| 3. | KOH test | +ive | Bacterial slime showed thread |
| 4. | Catalase test | +ive | Bubbles detected |
| 5. | Starch hydrolysis | +ive | Zone formation |
| 6. | Lecithinase test | +ive | Diffused zone detected |
| 7. | Tween 80 hydrolysis | +ive | White precipitation |
Evaluation of cotton germplasm and its response against bacterium dispersal methodology under glasshouse conditions.
| Variety | Disease Incidence% (Methods) | Disease Severity% (Methods) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scratch | Spray Gun | Water Splashes | Scratch | Spray Gun | Water Splashes | |
| Cyto-177 | 73.33 c | 53.33 b | 30.00 d | 40.26 bc | 43.21 c | 18.17 f |
| Cyto-178 | 73.33 c | 53.33 b | 30.00 d | 45.24 e | 31.91 de | 26.17 c |
| Cyto-179 | 73.33 c | 50.00 bc | 33.33 c | 32.26 b | 32.24 de | 31.27 b |
| Cim-616 | 50.00 d | 33.33 c | 50.00 b | 31.34 ef | 44.51 b | 21.11 e |
| Cim-496 | 83.33 b | 33.33 c | 16.66 e | 41.21 cd | 36.33 dc | 12.12 gh |
| Bt-886 | 50.00 d | 30.00 cd | 16.66 e | 44.41 ef | 27.21 f | 17.22 fg |
| Bt-986 | 70.00 cd | 50.00 bc | 16.66 e | 29.33 h | 21.91 g | 24.21 d |
| Bt-3701 | 70.00 cd | 53.33 b | 30.00 d | 47.21 c | 39.24 d | 25.24 cd |
| Bt-802 | 70.00 cd | 50.00 bc | 30.00 d | 43.64 fg | 45.24 bc | 19.23 f |
| SG-1 | 76.67 bc | 33.33 c | 33.33 c | 32.68 fg | 21.91 g | 11.11 gh |
| Control | 93.33 a | 80.66 a | 76.66 a | 40.17 a | 61.71 a | 67.23 a |
Means with the same letter are not statistically different at p = 0.05.
Figure 1Effect of different concentrations (ppm or µg mL−1 = microgram per milliliter) of aqueous plant extracts, viz., (A)Syzygium aromaticum, (B) Curcuma longa, (C) Moringa oleifera, (D) Azadirachta indica, (E) Mangifera indica, (F) Mentha piperita, (G)Aloe vera, (H) Syzygium cumini, (I) Prosopis juliflora and (J) Citrus limon, on the number of bacterial colonies of Xcm counted on nutrient agar media by poison food technique in vitro. +ive Control (St*) = Streptomycin, which was used as standard, and similarly, –ive Control (W*) = water, which was used to compare the results with aqueous extracts (botanicals) and streptomycin. Means followed by the same letters in each column are not statistically different when compared with least significant difference (p < 0.05); ppm = parts per million, which can be expressed as milligrams per liter (mg/L), or the measurement of mass of a chemical, or contaminate per unit volume of water; ppm, or µg mL−1 = microgram per milliliter, or mg/L, have the same meaning.
Figure 2Sankey diagram showing the flow of various concentrations of treatments, communicating various levels of treatments concentrations towards counted bacterial colonies; +ive Control (St*) = Streptomycin, which was used as standard, and similarly, –ive Control (W*) = water, which was used to compare the results with aqueous extracts (botanicals) and streptomycin.
Figure 3Effect of different concentrations (ppm or µg mL−1 = microgram per milliliter) of aqueous plant extracts, viz., (A)Syzygium aromaticum, (B) Curcuma longa, (C) Moringa oleifera, (D) Azadirachta indica, (E) Mangifera indica, (F) Mentha piperita, (G) Aloe vera, (H) Syzygium cumini, (I) Prosopis juliflora and (J) Citrus limon on the diameter of inhibition zone of Xcm on nutrient agar media plates by disk diffusion technique in vitro. +ive Control (St*) = Streptomycin, which was used as standard, and similarly, −ive control (W*) = water was used to compare the results with aqueous extracts (botanicals) and streptomycin. Means followed by the same letters in each column are not statistically different when compared with least significant difference (p < 0.05); ppm = parts per million, which can be expressed as milligrams per liter (mg/L), or the measurement of mass of a chemical, or contaminate per unit volume of water; ppm, or µg mL−1 = micro gram per milli liter, or mg/L, have the same meaning.
Figure 4Sankey diagram showing the flow of various concentrations of treatments, communicating various levels of treatment concentrations towards the diameter of the inhibition zone (cm); +ive Control (St*) = Streptomycin, which was used as standard, and similarly, –ive Control (W*) = water, which was used to compare the results with aqueous extracts (botanicals) and streptomycin.
List of indigenous plants species/biomolecules collected to evaluate against the bacterium.
| Treatments | Scientific Name | Family | Common Name | Part Used | Form Used |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 |
| Myrtaceae | Clove | Dried fruit | Fine particles |
| T2 |
| Zingiberaceae | Haldii | Dried fruit | Fine particles |
| T3 |
| Labiatae | Podeena | Green leaves | Fine particles |
| T4 |
| Fabaceae | Keekaar | Green leaves | Fine particles |
| T5 |
| Anacardiaceae | Amm | Dried seed | Fine particles |
| T6 |
| Myrtaceae | Jamun | Dried seed | Fine particles |
| T7 |
| Xanthorrhoeaceae | Gavaargandal | Green leaves | Gel-like material |
| T8 |
| Rutaceae | Lemon | Dried fruit | Fine particles |
| T9 |
| Meliaceae | Nem | Green leaves | Fine particles |
| T10 |
| Moringaceae | Sohangana | Green leaves | Fine particles |
Activity of plant biomolecules, active ingredients, their potential and target pathogens/diseases.
| Biomolecule Source | Active Ingredient | Target Pathogen | Potential | Disease | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Sesquiterpenes, monoterpenes, hydrocarbon, phenolic compounds (e.g., Eugenyl acetate, eugenol, and β-caryophyllene | Antiviral, antifungal, antibacterial, antioxidant | BLB of rice, | [ | |
|
| Curcumin, | antifungal, antibacterial | Turmeric rhizome rot and leaf blight diseases | [ | |
|
| Menthol, menthone, menthyl acetate, 1,8-cineole, limonene, beta-pinene and beta-caryophyllene | antifungal, | Postharvest fungal disease of vegetables and fruits | [ | |
|
| C-glycosyl flavones (such as schaftoside, isoschaftoside, vicenin II, vitexin and isovitexin | antifungal, | Late leaf spot and rust of groundnut | [ | |
|
| lysine, leucine, cysteine, valine, arginine, phenylalanine, and methionine | Anti-oxidant, anti-viral, immunomodulation, hypolipidemic, anti-microbial | BLB of rice, bacterial diseases | [ | |
|
| anthocyanins, glucoside, ellagic acid, isoquercetin, kaemferol, jambosine and myrecetin | Antifungal, | Blight disease of the chickpea | [ | |
|
| sugars, lignin, saponins, salicylic acids and amino acids, Anthraquinones | Antifungal, | Leaf spots of fungi | [ | |
|
| arachidonic acid, behenic acid and linoleic acid, and also tocopherols and carotenoids |
| Antifungal, | Anthracnose of mango fruit | [ |
|
| Azadirachtin, nimbolinin, nimbin, nimbidin, nimbidol, sodium nimbinate, gedunin, salannin, and quercetin | Antifungal, | Leaf spot diseases, | [ | |
|
| myrecytin, quercetin and kaempferol | Antifungal, | Wilt disease, leaf spot disease | [ |