| Literature DB >> 35631155 |
Łukasz Witucki1, Monika Kurpik2, Hieronim Jakubowski1,3, Michał Szulc4, Przemysław Łukasz Mikołajczak4, Jadwiga Jodynis-Liebert2, Małgorzata Kujawska2.
Abstract
Rich in polyphenols, cranberry juice (CJ) with high antioxidant activity is believed to contribute to various health benefits. However, our knowledge of the neuroprotective potential of cranberries is limited. Previously, we have demonstrated that CJ treatment controls oxidative stress in several organs, with the most evident effect in the brain. In this study, we examined the capability of CJ for protection against Parkinson's disease (PD) in a rotenone (ROT) rat model. Wistar rats were administered with CJ in a dose of 500 mg/kg b.w./day (i.g.) and subcutaneously injected with ROT (1.3 mg/kg b.w./day). The experiment lasted 45 days, including 10 days pre-treatment with CJ and 35 days combined treatment with CJ and ROT. We quantified the expression of α-synuclein and apoptosis markers in the midbrain, performed microscopic examination, and assessed postural instability to evaluate the CJ neuroprotective effect. Our results indicate that the juice treatment provided neuroprotection, as evidenced by declined α-synuclein accumulation, Bax and cleaved/active caspase-9 expression, and normalized cytochrome c level that was accompanied by the enhancement of neuronal activity survival and improved postural instability. Importantly, we also found that long-term administration of CJ alone in a relatively high dose may exert a deleterious effect on cell survival in the midbrain.Entities:
Keywords: Parkinson’s disease; apoptosis; postural instability; α-synuclein
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35631155 PMCID: PMC9144186 DOI: 10.3390/nu14102014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Rat groups and treatments.
| Group (n) | Treatment | |
|---|---|---|
| 1st–10th Day | 11th–45th Day | |
| Control (n = 11) | water ( | water ( |
| CJ 1 (n = 11) | CJ 1 ( | CJ 1 ( |
| ROT 2 (n = 11) | water ( | water ( |
| CJ + ROT (n = 11) | CJ 1 ( | CJ 1 ( |
CJ, Cranberry juice, ROT, rotenon; i.g., intragastrically; s.c., subqutaneous; b.w., body weight 1 (500 mg/kg b.w./day), 2 (1.3 mg/kg b.w./day).
Figure 1A scheme of experimental design.
Figure 2Effect of cranberry juice (CJ) treatment on α-synuclein expression. The top panel shows representative immunoblots. The graph shows the relative expression of α-synuclein normalized to GAPDH ± SEM in the midbrain of rotenone (ROT) injected rats (n = 8/group). Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Fischer’s LSD multiple comparisons test. * p < 0.05 vs. Control; *** p < 0.001 vs. Control; # p < 0.05 vs. ROT.
Figure 3Effect of cranberry juice (CJ) treatment on apoptosis markers. Top panel shows a representative immunoblots. Graphs show relative expression ± SEM of Bax (a), cytochrome c (b), and caspase-9 (c), normalized to GAPDH, in the midbrain of rotenone (ROT) injected rats (n = 8/group). Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Fischer’s LSD multiple comparisons test. * p < 0.05 vs. control; ** p < 0.01 vs. control; **** p < 0.0001 vs. control; # p < 0.05 vs. ROT; ## p < 0.01 vs. ROT.
Figure 4Representative photomicrographs of rat midbrain sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Normal neurons (blue arrows) are seen in Control and CJ alone treated rats. ROT administration caused noticeable degeneration of neurons (red arrows). Rats treated with CJ + ROT exhibit normal neurons (blue arrows) with a few cells with signs of degeneration (red arrows). Scale bar—20 μm (a); Quantification of cells on two sections from 3 animals from each group expressed as a percent of control (b). Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Fischer’s LSD multiple comparisons test. * p < 0.05 vs. control; **** p < 0.0001 vs. control; #### p < 0.0001 vs. ROT (b).
Figure 5Effect of cranberry juice (CJ) treatment on postural instability in rotenone (ROT)-injected rats. Data are presented as median (bars) and interquartile range (whiskers) of eight rats per group and analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. * p < 0.05 vs. Control. # p < 0.05 vs. ROT.