| Literature DB >> 35630901 |
Orlando Lima1, Cátia Afonso2, Iran Rocha Segundo1,2, Salmon Landi3, Natália C Homem4, Elisabete Freitas1, Amanda Alcantara5, Verônica Castelo Branco5, Sandra Soares5, Jorge Soares5, Vasco Teixeira2, Joaquim Carneiro2.
Abstract
Aging by oxidation of asphalt roadway material promotes changes in its physical, chemical, and rheological properties, affecting its hardening and accelerating the degradation of its corresponding asphalt mixture. Titanium dioxide (TiO2) has been applied in engineering investigations to promote anti-aging and photocatalytic properties. In this study, a commercial binder was modified with nano-TiO2 (using contents of 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 6%). It was evaluated by physicochemical and rheological tests (penetration, softening point, mass loss, dynamic viscosity, rheology, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy-FTIR) before and after aging by rolling thin-film oven test (RTFOT) and pressure aging vessel (PAV). The results indicated that incorporating nano-TiO2 mitigates binder aging, pointing out 0.25% as an optimum modification content for the investigated asphalt binder.Entities:
Keywords: FTIR; anti-aging; asphalt binders; nano-TiO2; nanomodification; semiconductor nanoparticles
Year: 2022 PMID: 35630901 PMCID: PMC9145936 DOI: 10.3390/nano12101678
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Figure 1SEM micrograph of the (a) powder of TiO2 nanoparticles, and (b) surface view of a SEM macrograph of asphalt binder modified with nano-TiO2.
Figure 2Schematic representation of this research.
Results for penetration, softening point, and mass loss.
| TiO2 Content | Penetration (10−1 mm) | Softening Point (°C) | Mass Loss (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before RTFOT | After RTFOT | Before RTFOT | After RTFOT | ||
| 0 | 40 | 27 | 65 | 85 | 0.57 |
| 0.1 | 39 | 28 | 73 | 81 | 0.57 |
| 0.25 | 39 | 29 | 71 | 78 | 0.53 |
| 0.50 | 39 | 29 | 71 | 77 | 0.50 |
| 1 | 39 | 27 | 73 | 79 | 0.38 |
| 2 | 39 | 27 | 72 | 78 | 0.48 |
| 3 | 40 | 18 | 73 | 79 | 0.48 |
| 6 | 37 | 20 | 74 | 81 | 0.45 |
Results of dynamic viscosity at different temperatures 135, 150, 177, and 190 °C.
| TiO2 Content (%) | Dynamic Viscosity (cP) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before RTFOT | After RTFOT | Before RTFOT | After RTFOT | Before RTFOT | After RTFOT | Before RTFOT | After RTFOT | |
| 0 | 2784 | 5588 | 1138 | 2163 | 388 | 600 | 271 | 363 |
| 0.1 | 2909 | 5958 | 1209 | 2383 | 409 | 638 | 263 | 400 |
| 0.25 | 2638 | 5038 | 1175 | 1988 | 442 | 592 | 271 | 375 |
| 0.5 | 2875 | 5729 | 1204 | 2250 | 413 | 625 | 263 | 413 |
| 1 | 2825 | 5625 | 1275 | 2242 | 438 | 650 | 288 | 400 |
| 2 | 3117 | 6496 | 1363 | 2384 | 450 | 650 | 279 | 413 |
| 3 | 4463 | 7458. | 1400 | 2150 | 500 | 613 | 334 | 388 |
| 6 | 4058 | 8429 | 1663 | 3121 | 554 | 879 | 388 | 554 |
(a) Results of complex modulus for the modified asphalt binders 0%, 0.1%, and 0.25%. (b) Results of complex modulus for the modified asphalt binders 0.5%, 1%, and 2%. (c) Results of complex modulus for the modified asphalt binders 3% and 6%.
|
| |||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
| 0 | 2.61 × 107 | 3.90 × 107 | 4.28 × 107 | 6.29 × 107 | 1.87 × 107 | 4.54 × 107 | |||
| 10 | 6.99 × 106 | 1.12 × 107 | 1.07 × 107 | 1.89 × 107 | 5.02 × 106 | 1.37 × 107 | |||
| 20 | 1.38 × 106 | 2.76 × 106 | 2.17 × 106 | 4.47 × 106 | 1.05 × 106 | 3.28 × 106 | |||
| 30 | 2.81 × 105 | 6.62 × 105 | 4.51 × 105 | 6.94 × 105 | 2.22 × 105 | 7.62 × 105 | |||
| 40 | 7.82 × 104 | 1.68 × 105 | 5.69 × 105 | 7.39 × 104 | 1.74 × 105 | 5.08 × 105 | 7.19 × 104 | 1.32 × 105 | 4.69 × 105 |
| 50 | 2.28 × 104 | 5.30 × 104 | 1.69 × 105 | 2.33 × 104 | 5.18 × 104 | 1.51 × 105 | 2.18 × 104 | 3.99 × 104 | 1.29 × 105 |
| 60 | 8.09 × 103 | 1.86 × 104 | 5.70 × 104 | 8.72 × 103 | 1.78 × 104 | 4.97 × 104 | 7.72 × 103 | 1.42 × 104 | 4.25 × 104 |
| 70 | 3.21 × 103 | 7.47 × 103 | 2.24 × 104 | 3.65 × 103 | 7.07 × 103 | 2.08 × 104 | 3.13 × 103 | 5.75 × 103 | 1.63 × 104 |
| 80 | 1.37 × 103 | 3.28 × 103 | 9.66 × 103 | 1.64 × 103 | 3.11 × 103 | 8.41 × 103 | 1.38 × 103 | 2.56 × 103 | 6.99 × 103 |
| 90 | 6.11 × 102 | 1.50 × 103 | 4.37 × 103 | 7.67 × 102 | 1.41 × 103 | 3.87 × 103 | 6.21 × 102 | 1.18 × 103 | 3.19 × 103 |
|
| |||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
| 0 | 2.60 × 107 | 5.15 × 107 | 2.18 × 107 | 3.70 × 107 | 2.21 × 107 | 4.99 × 107 | |||
| 10 | 6.53 × 106 | 1.47 × 107 | 5.63 × 106 | 1.13 × 107 | 5.58 × 106 | 1.41 × 107 | |||
| 20 | 1.33 × 106 | 3.41 × 106 | 1.16 × 106 | 2.82 × 106 | 1.14 × 106 | 3.41 × 106 | |||
| 30 | 2.75 × 105 | 5.00 × 105 | 2.43 × 105 | 6.89 × 105 | 6.64 × 105 | 4.39 × 105 | |||
| 40 | 7.52 × 104 | 1.51 × 105 | 4.85 × 105 | 7.48 × 104 | 2.10 × 105 | 6.13 × 105 | 7.71 × 104 | 1.64 × 105 | 5.43 × 105 |
| 50 | 2.27 × 104 | 4.49 × 104 | 1.38 × 105 | 2.23 × 104 | 6.06 × 104 | 1.75 × 105 | 2.40 × 104 | 4.98 × 104 | 1.58 × 105 |
| 60 | 7.91 × 103 | 1.56 × 104 | 4.61 × 104 | 7.95 × 103 | 2.04 × 104 | 5.44 × 104 | 8.66 × 103 | 1.79 × 104 | 5.07 × 104 |
| 70 | 3.19 × 103 | 6.24 × 103 | 1.79 × 104 | 3.28 × 103 | 8.03 × 103 | 2.04 × 104 | 3.54 × 103 | 7.30 × 103 | 1.94 × 104 |
| 80 | 1.38 × 103 | 2.74 × 103 | 7.60 × 103 | 1.44 × 103 | 3.44 × 103 | 8.55 × 103 | 1.56 × 103 | 3.24 × 103 | 8.29 × 103 |
| 90 | 6.14 × 102 | 1.25 × 103 | 3.44 × 103 | 6.53 × 102 | 1.53 × 103 | 3.85 × 103 | 7.13 × 102 | 1.49 × 103 | 3.76 × 103 |
|
| |||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| |||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||
| 0 | 2.70 × 107 | 4.68 × 107 | 3.16 × 107 | 4.09 × 107 | |||||
| 10 | 7.31 × 106 | 1.38 × 107 | 8.30 × 106 | 1.28 × 107 | |||||
| 20 | 1.56 × 106 | 3.35 × 106 | 1.75 × 106 | 3.27 × 106 | |||||
| 30 | 3.38 × 105 | 8.08 × 105 | 3.76 × 105 | 7.66 × 105 | |||||
| 40 | 8.61 × 104 | 1.89 × 105 | 6.83 × 105 | 7.85 × 104 | 2.54 × 105 | 6.28 × 105 | |||
| 50 | 2.52 × 104 | 5.62 × 104 | 1.92 × 105 | 2.48 × 104 | 7.34 × 104 | 2.17 × 105 | |||
| 60 | 8.91 × 103 | 1.98 × 104 | 6.19 × 104 | 9.19 × 103 | 2.52 × 104 | 6.86 × 104 | |||
| 70 | 3.63 × 103 | 7.95 × 103 | 2.36 × 104 | 3.88 × 103 | 9.99 × 103 | 2.61 × 104 | |||
| 80 | 1.58 × 103 | 3.52 × 103 | 1.00 × 104 | 1.79 × 103 | 4.39 × 103 | 1.11 × 104 | |||
| 90 | 7.17 × 102 | 1.62 × 103 | 4.50 × 103 | 8.55 × 102 | 2.02 × 103 | 4.78 × 103 | |||
Figure 3Black diagram for the binders studied in this research versus those from Ref. [43].
Figure 4FTIR spectra for all unaged binders investigated in this research work.
Figure 5FTIR spectra of RTFOT + PAV aged binders.
Figure 6FTIR indices of (a) unaged binders, (b) RTFOT aged binders, and (c) RTFOT + PAV aged binders.