| Literature DB >> 35630886 |
Sami Salama Hussen Hajjaj1,2, Ahmad Abdul Kareem Ahmad Aqeel2, Mohamed Thariq Hameed Sultan3,4,5, Farah Syazwani Shahar3, Ain Umaira Md Shah3.
Abstract
The global need for energy has grown in tandem with mankind's development and spread. This has resulted in an increase in the use of fossil energy sources, a decline in these sources and an increase in pollution, necessitating the search for renewable energy sources. One of the important ways to reduce pollution resulting from the increasing consumption of fossil energy is to enhance the sources of solar energy, of which photovoltaic cells (PV) are one of its most important tools. Therefore, it was necessary to pay attention to improving its efficiency for it to become a promising source of clean energy. PVs turn solar energy into electricity; however, the amount of electricity generated decreases as the temperature of the cells rises in response to the sun's heat. Cooling of the optical surfaces is one of the most important elements to consider while running solar PV systems to obtain maximum efficiency. The electrical efficiency of PVs is enhanced when suitable cooling technology is used, and the rate of cell breakdown is reduced over time, extending the life of the PV panels. There are many materials used to remove unwanted heat in PV cells, and in recent years, the focus has been on integrating nanomaterials in specific proportions with traditional cooling materials such as water to improve their thermal properties. As a bio-material that is environmentally friendly, renewable, sustainable, inexpensive and has high mechanical properties, cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) are one of the most promising materials for improving the properties of cooling materials for cooling PV cells and improving their performance.Entities:
Keywords: cellulose nanocrystal (CNC); cooling materials; environment; nanofluids; photovoltaic thermal system (PV/T); solar energy
Year: 2022 PMID: 35630886 PMCID: PMC9144813 DOI: 10.3390/nano12101664
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Photovoltaic cooling techniques.
| Techniques | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| Air cooling Photovoltaic/Thermal |
Easy-to-use technology. Air is always accessible. Improves the overall efficiency. It is economically feasible. Heated air is employed in HVAC systems. Reduces corrosive danger. |
Has limited thermal capacities and requires a lot of energy to circulate air blowers (in active cooling). Has low mass-flow rates, so little effect on PV temperatures. |
| Water cooling Photovoltaic/Thermal |
Overall efficiency has improved. Increased electric energy conversion efficiency. Hot water is utilized for residential purposes. Space requirements are less than for individual systems. |
High start-up costs. System life is reduced. In chilly weather, it is possible that you will freeze. Pumping power consumes a lot of electricity. Possible corrosion, fouling and leaking. |
| PV/water spraying |
Increased conversion of solar energy. Higher thermal conductivity and heat capacity (low thermal resistance). |
The PV panel’s surface area is partly cooled. A higher price (maintenance, pumping power) Heat is a waste of resources. |
| PV/water immersion cooling |
Extremely effective. Friendly to the environment Both the front and rear surfaces transmit heat. |
The depth of submersion has an impact on efficiency. Higher price. Because the item is insulated inside the water, the system is complicated to build. |
| PV/Phase-Change Materials cooling |
At modest temperature changes, huge amounts of heat may be stored. Phase-change happens at a steady temperature; therefore, the system can work even when the sun is not shining. The heat that is absorbed can be utilized to heat structures. |
PCM has a low heat conductivity in its solid form. Some PCMs are poisonous and provide a fire hazard. After the conclusion of the life cycle, there is a difficulty with disposal. The quantity of active volume available for thermal storage is limited by segregation. |
| Cooling of PV/Heat Pipes |
Heat fluxes that are extremely high. Heat exchange that is passive. Transfer of heat across large distances. It is simple to combine. Longer life span. |
High price. Difficult to produce. Non-condensable gas production. Working agent leakage. |
| PV/Microchannel heat sink cooling |
Removes a lot of heat from a tiny space. Low inventory of fluids is necessary. Low electricity consumption; thermal resistance is low. |
Limitations on pressure decrease. Corrosion is an issue. Manufacturing at a high cost. |
| PV/Nano-fluids cooling |
There are nanofluids on the market. Thermal efficiency that is higher. |
Technology in its infancy. Influences are unknown (interaction with base fluids and characteristics). Nanoparticles are expensive. |
| PV/Spectrum filter |
The operating temperature has been reduced. Hybridization with concentrating or other systems is possible. |
Technology that is not completely developed. High-priced (glass filters) |
Cooling technique methods.
| Cooling Technique | Method/Paradigm | Finding/Results |
|---|---|---|
| Forced water [ | Comparison of the overall efficiency between covered and uncovered PVT. | The overall annual efficiency of covered PVT is 42.3% and 52.6% for uncovered one. |
| PV/T Nanofluids [ | Numerical and experimental in the current work, a comprehensive assessment of nanoparticle applications in photovoltaic (PV) cooling was conducted. | Photovoltaic systems can benefit from nanofluids to improve their thermal, electrical and overall efficiency. |
| CPV/T cooling mediums [ | A thorough literature analysis is offered, outlining the benefits, drawbacks and promise of current CPVT research. There are graphical and tabular summaries of several distinct CPVT design offers in this section. | Multijunction, non-silicon-based solar cells are chosen for high concentration ratios due to their good performance at high operating temperatures. Silicon-based monocrystalline solar cells, on the other hand, are favored at lower concentration ratios due to their cost-effectiveness and off-the-shelf availability. |
| CPV/T cooling mediums [ | Previous studies show the temperature of the cooling medium for photovoltaic cells (low, medium, high) and the applications in which this heat can be used. In addition, it shows the type and efficiency of the photovoltaic cells used and the type of working fluid. | PVT analysis using inexpensive and readily accessible spectrum filters liquids (UV–VIS–NIR). |
| PV/T spectrum filter [ | A UV–VIS–NIR spectrophotometer is used to analyze the absorption and transmission of 200–2500 nm wavelength solar spectrums of various liquids | The output power, conversion efficiency and total energy efficiency of the proposed combination system are higher than those of a standard solar concentration PV system under the same conditions, as per the outcomes |
| Forced air [ | Using a varied flow rate of air to cool PV cells and comparing its efficiency to conventional PV | Thermal efficiency improved from 30.3 percent to 46 percent, while electrical efficiency increased from 9.5 percent to 10.2 percent, according to the findings. In comparison to the traditional cell, the flow increased from 0.021 kg/s to 0.042 kg/s |
| Forced water [ | Experimental examination of the performance of a photovoltaic panel under the influence of different solar rays with stabilization of the amount of coolant flow and the inlet temperature of the coolant. | High sun radiation and the volume flow rate of the cooling fluid have significant influence on PVT performance, according to the research. |
| PV/T Nanofluids [ | investigate the achievement of a nanofluid-based PV/T collector using various nanofluids, particle volume concentrations and mass flow rates. | 1: The PV/T collector with Al2O3/water as a coolant has a greater electrical and thermal power than one with TiO2/water. 2: Nanoparticle concentration improves the nanofluid heat transfer coefficient, PV power and PV efficiency. |
| Forced air [ | Experimental performance of the PVT (air) and mathematical models were compared with commercial PV. | The results showed an improvement in the performance of air-cooled photovoltaic cells, with great agreement between the theoretical and experimental results |
| PV/heatsink [ | The thermal efficiency sinks for various designs with varying fin thicknesses and fin heights, as well as their effect on PV, were evaluated using a simulation model. | For CPV cells, a multi-channel heat sink is used. |
| PV/heat pipe [ | The thermal performance of two systems (wickless heat pipe PV/T and wire-meshed heat pipe PV/T) operating at varying inclination degrees was investigated experimentally using a solar simulator. | At no reduction in the temperature, wickless and wire-meshed heat pipe PV/T systems’ thermal efficiencies were 52.8 percent and 51.5 percent, respectively. |
| PV/heatsink [ | Different degrees of the heatsink’s fin width and their influence on hydraulic performance, as well as the temperature level and uniformity of the PV module, are investigated using numerical simulations using CFD software. | The suggested heatsink design has superior hydraulic properties, resulting in increased heat transmission while utilizing the same amount of material as a traditional design. |
| PV/heat pipe [ | During the day and at night, the heat loss coefficients of Formal PV/T and PV with heat pipe systems are inversely proportional. Based on data from a typical climatic year in Shanghai, the impacts of each on the annually successful supply days, yearly heat gain and yearly electric gain are compared and analyzed in this study. | The PV/heat pipe system’s decreased night-time heat loss greatly enhances photo thermal performance while somewhat lowering photovoltaic performance when compared to a normal PV/T system. |
| PV/spraying water [ | When compared to a steady-spray water cooling system and an uncooled PV module, a pulsed-spray water cooling system is developed for solar panels to enhance efficiency and reduce water usage throughout the cooling process. | The results demonstrate that the solar panel’s highest electrical energy generation improves by roughly 33.3 percent, 27.7% and 25.9%, respectively, as compared to non-cooled panels while using spray water cooling (steady and pulsed) and non-cooled panels. |
| PV/spraying water [ | To better understand the heat transfer characteristics between the solar panel and water, the impact of the water spray’s mass percent on heat transfer coefficients was investigated by calculating the best quantity of total spray water to use for cleaning and cooling PV. | At an optimal flow of 170 L/h, the electrical efficiency of the system was 15.73 percent, with a panel energy capacity of 40.25 W, and the system produced a peak power of 39.48 W, while the pump needed 0.77 W of power |
| PV/immersion [ | For linear concentrating photovoltaic systems, cooling by the immersion of solar cells in dimethyl silicon oil is suggested as a heat diffusion solution. | The electrical behavior of the silicon-oil-immersed cells is steady, and after 270 days, no significant efficiency deterioration was found. |
| PV/immersion [ | A dish concentrator (250X) with tracking was used to test a unique CPV system that used de-ionized water for cooling by immersing. | The temperature distribution of the module is very uniform; however, after a wide time of immersion in de-ionized water, the cell module’s electrical efficiency drops. |
| PV/PCM [ | To lower the working temperature, solar panels using phase-change materials (PCM) are employed. | PV–PCM integrated systems have been shown to increase electricity efficiency by up to 5%. According to the findings, inorganic PCMs offer a high potential for PV cooling. |
| PV/PCM [ | Under hot climatic circumstances, this study illustrates how to use paraffin wax (PCM) to reduce the running temperature of a c-Si PV module. | The use of a PCM improves the performance of a c-Si PV panel by controlling its thermal properties, which is critical for its reliable operation in hot regions. |
Nanocellulose in thermal applications.
| Application | Challenge/Question | Materials Used | Finding/Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Improve the solar collector’s efficiency [ | Low energy efficiency and low output temperature in solar collectors. | Addition of nanoparticles (Al2O3 and CNC) to a basic fluid. | The flat plate solar collector’s energy gain and thermal efficiency were both increased. For 0.5 percent Al2O3, the greatest efficiency was 2.48 percent, while for 0.5 percent CNC nanofluids, it was 8.46 percent. Using CNC/water-EG nanofluid in a flat plate solar collector, an increase in efficiency of around 5.8% may be attained. |
| Strengthening the thermo-physical characteristics of the solar collector’s fluid [ | Base fluids are suffering from low thermal physical properties. | Using nano cellulose at different concentrations and different temperatures. | Because the nanofluid displays greater thermal conductivity and viscosity at elevated temperatures, it may be deduced that it is suitable for use in a higher-temperature environment. |
| Improve machining performances [ | Flank wear, chipping and abrasion are the most common causes of MWF machining failure. | Adding cellulose nanocrystal at different concentrations and different temperatures to cooling fluid. | As the CNC volume concentration and temperature grow, the thermal conductivity of the base fluid increases, enhancing its influence on the cutting machine. |
| In a heat exchanger, nanocellulose is used as a heat transfer liquid [ | Investigate the performance of car radiator coolant using a cooling material consisting of cellulose nanoparticles combined with Ethylene Glycol. | As a coolant, cellulose nanoparticles combined with Ethylene Glycol were used. | It may be observed that employing cellulose nanoparticles in a car radiator as a cooler in combination with ethylene glycol is practical and improves the heat transfer rate. |
| Impregnate nano-cellulose with EG for car radiator applications [ | Nanoparticles improve the convective heat transfer performance of the base fluid. | As a coolant, cellulose nanoparticles combined with Ethylene Glycol were used. | When compared to distilled water, the use of nanocellulose with Ethylene Glycol for automobile radiator applications demonstrates a higher heat absorption effectiveness. |
| Using cellulose nanocrystals in different thermal applications [ | Increase the use of crystal nanocellulose in a variety of applications. | Adding crystal nanocellulose to certain materials. | CNCs have attracted the attention of business and academia due to their unique qualities, which include cheap cost, renewable resource extraction, minimal toxicity and good mechanical strength. |
| Thermal applications [ | In most technical applications, the low heat transfer capability of conventional thermal transport fluids is an unresolved problem. | Addition of crystal nanocellulose materials to the base liquid. | Thermal conductivity and relative viscosity increase with the volume concentration of nanoparticals and the temperature. |
| Coolant of automotive engine radiator [ | Enhance radiator performance. | Enhance the thermo-physical properties of base fluid by adding nanomateials to it with different volume concentrations and different temperatures. | The thermal conductivity Al2O3/CNC composite nanofluids’ enhancement increases with the temperature and volume concentration. |
| Car radiator application [ | The rapid rise in energy demand needs additional improvements in the heat transfer process as well as a decrease in energy loss owing to inefficient system operation. | Changing percentages of hybrid metal oxides just like Al2O3 and TiO2 both with and without CNC taken from the plant base. | The mono Al2O3 nanofluids outperformed the CNC and TiO2 nanofluids in terms of thermal conductivity enhancement. The Al2O3/CNC nanofluids, on the other hand, had better thermal conductivity than Al2O3/TiO2 nanofluids (mono and hybrid) |
| General thermal application [ | Because of its exceptional mechanical characteristics, renewability and biodegradability, nanocellulose has gotten a lot of interest in research and industry in recent years as a nanoscale material for reinforcing polymer matrix composites. | Incorporating nanocellulose with other compounds to form nanocomposites. | Nanocellulose has enhanced the thermal and thermomechanical properties of nanocomposites in general. |
| Radiator for automobiles [ | In numerous engineering processes, standard working fluids (such as water, motor lubricant and ethylene glycol) have a limited ability to transmit heat. | Graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) and cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) spread in a base fluid. | The colloidal stability of GNPs/CNC nanofluids at a 0.1 percent volume concentration was exceptional in the base fluid of EG: W at a 60:40 ratio. Traditional heat transfer fluids may be replaced with the present hybrid nanofluid, resulting in more efficient and compact thermal structures. |
| Thermal applications [ | Invent nanofluid with the highest thermal conductivity and specific heat capacity. | CNC (nanomaterial) distributed in a combination of ethylene glycol and distilled water. | The density has a proportionate relationship to volume concentration and an inverse relationship with temperature, according to the results of the experiments. The specific heat capacity, on the other hand, has a proportionate relationship with temperature and an inverse connection with volume concentration. |
| Machining process cooling [ | To increase product quality and the cutting equipment’s life, it is critical to reduce heat generated during machining. | CNC is dispersed in a combination of ethylene glycol distilled water. | When CNC-based nanofluids are utilized, the total heat generated at the cutting tool and the temperature created at the chip when milling both improve dramatically. |
| Machining process cooling [ | Coolant handling and disposal costs are considerable, and with the potential of harmful materials, the disposal of spent coolant is a major issue, since it may have a negative impact on the environment. | Nanofluid made of ethylene glycol and nanocellulose. | The greatest temperature measurement achieved with MWF is 225 °C, but the greatest temperature reading produced with nano-fluid is 154 °C, reflecting a decreased temperature distribution for the chip developed during milling. |
Figure 1Effect of temperature on the I–V characteristic.
Using nanomaterials in thermal applications.
| Materials Used | Problem/Challenge | Concentration | Finding |
|---|---|---|---|
| Add nano-carbon to KAl(SO4)2·12H2O/Na2SO4·10H2O | Energy shortage | 1 wt% nano-carbon | The proposed combination is low-priced, easy-to-prepare and accessible, lowering the cost of an energy storage device [ |
| Dissolve KAl(SO4)2·12H2O in distilled water | Improving the optical specifications of the water. | 0.05%, 0.075%, 0.1%, 0.125 and 0.15 gm./mL | The optical characteristics of these solutions are shown to vary continuously with an increasing concentration in this investigation. |
| Coupled KAl(SO4)2·12H2O with GN | Improving the thermal conductivity of the KAl(SO4)2·12H2O. | 0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, 2%, 2.5% | The conductivity of KAl(SO4)2·12H2O/GN compounds increases considerably as the GN concentration increased [ |
| Use nano-(Al2O3, CuO and SiC) with water | When the temperature of solar cells rises, their efficiency falls. | 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4% | The results revealed that when nanoparticles were introduced to water, thermal conductivity rose, and SiC nanofluid had a higher stability than the other nanofluids investigated [ |
| Al2O3-water nanofluid | Enhancing the PV/T overall efficiency of the system. | 0.05, 0.075, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 | The average amount of electrical energy of nanofluid-based PVTS rises by 16.3, 24.6 and 17.1 percent for 0.05, 0.1 and 0.3 percent, respectively [ |
| Al2O3, TiO2 and ZnO distributed in water | Enhancement of energy, exergy and entropy generation compared to the PV unit. | 0.2 wt.% | PVT/ZnO and PVT/TiO2 systems have greater total energy and exergy efficiency than other systems [ |
| Cellulose nanoparticles Ethylene glycol | Low energy efficiency and low output temperature plague solar collectors. | 0–1.3% | Because the nanofluid displays greater thermal conductivity and viscosity at elevated temperatures, it may be deduced that it is suitable for use in a higher temperature environment [ |
| Zn-water | During the summer season, heat is retained inside the PV cells. | 0 to 0.5% wt. | When compared to water-based PVTS, the electrical energy of Zn–water nanofluid-based PVTS increased by 20% [ |
| MWCNT/water | PVT’s thermal performance should be improved. | 0 to 1% wt. | PVTS using MWCNT and water had about 0.14 and 3.67 percent greater TE and EE than pure water. If you compare it to fresh water, the findings of the experimental and numerical tests indicated that using MWCNT/water increases the overall power efficiency by 4.11 and 3.81 percent, respectively [ |
| GNP/water | PV electric generation decreases when the temperature of photovoltaic (PV) panels continues to rise. | 0 to 0.15% volume fraction | The NF volume proportion and the HTF flow rate were varied between 0 and 0.15 percent and 20–40 LPM, respectively. According to their findings, the PVTS’s overall efficiency improved by 14.1, 12.6 and 10.9 percent at flow rates of 40, 30 and 20 LPM, respectively [ |
| Boehmite water | For the PV cell, evaluate the cooling performance using water-based Boehmite nanofluids. | 0.01, 0.1 and 0.5 wt.% | When nanoparticles are present, the average temperature of the PV cell is significantly lower than that of the base fluid [ |
Nanocellulose in combination with other substances.
| Added Nanomaterial Type | Properties | Finding |
|---|---|---|
| Graphene nanoplatelets and CNC [ | GNPs with characteristics of an 800 m2/g specific surface area, 99.9% purity, 3 mm size and 1.5 µm diameter were employed. | For 30 days, the examined nanofluids remained stable, with no significant sedimentation. The findings of GNPs/CNC nanofluids at a 0.1 percent volume concentration showed outstanding colloidal stability in the base fluid of EG:W at a 60:40 ratio. |
| Al2O3, TiO2 and CNC [ | The sizes of the smaller and larger particles are 50–90 nm and 1–5 µm, respectively. | The mono Al2O3 nanofluids outperformed the CNC and TiO2 nanofluids in terms of thermal conductivity enhancement. The Al2O3/CNC hybrid nanofluids, on the other hand, had better thermal conductivity than the other mono and hybrid nanofluids (Al2O3/TiO2). |
| Al2O3/CNC composite nanofluids are made in a 60:40 ratio [ | Volume concentrations are 0.1%, 0.5% and 0.9%. | With an increasing temp. and volume fraction, the thermal conductivity of Al2O3/CNC composite nanofluids improves. |
| Al2O3/CNC distributed in a base mixture water to ethylene glycol (40:60) [ | Nanoparticles’ average size is 13 nm with a spherical shape. | The rate of heat transfer rises as the flow rate of the coolant or working fluid in the radiator cooling system increases. |
| Al2O3 and CNC [ | Using 0.5% Al2O3 and 0.5% CNC, | The thermal conductivity of nanofluids rose, but viscosity decreased as the temperature climbed. Nanofluids have the potential to improve the efficiency of flat-plate solar collectors. |
| Nano cellulose, ethylene glycol and water [ | It was carried out at temperatures of 30–70 °C and volume concentrations of up to 1.3 percent. | It can be concluded that the nanofluid is applicable in a higher temperature environment since the nanofluid exhibits enhanced thermal conductivity and viscosity at the elevated temperature. |
Figure 2Renewable energy shares of global electricity production.