| Literature DB >> 35630885 |
Xiuhong Li1, Yujie Peng1, Yichen Deng1, Fangping Ye1, Chupeng Zhang1, Xinyu Hu1, Yong Liu2, Daode Zhang1.
Abstract
The accumulation of plastic waste resulting from the increasing demand for non-degradable plastics has led to a global environmental crisis. The severe environmental and economic drawbacks of inefficient, expensive, and impractical traditional waste disposal methods, such as landfills, incineration, plastic recycling, and energy production, limit the expansion of their applications to solving the plastic waste problem. Finding novel ways to manage the large amount of disposed plastic waste is urgent. Until now, one of the most valuable strategies for the handling of plastic waste has been to reutilize the waste as raw material for the preparation of functional and high-value products. Electrospun micro/nanofibers have drawn much attention in recent years due to their advantages of small diameter, large specific area, and excellent physicochemical features. Thus, electrospinning recycled plastic waste into micro/nanofibers creates diverse opportunities to deal with the environmental issue caused by the growing accumulation of plastic waste. This paper presents a review of recycling and reutilizing polymer waste via electrospinning. Firstly, the advantages of the electrospinning approach to recycling plastic waste are summarized. Then, the studies of electrospun recycled plastic waste are concluded. Finally, the challenges and future perspectives of electrospun recycled plastic waste are provided. In conclusion, this paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of electrospun recycled plastic waste for researchers to develop further studies.Entities:
Keywords: electrospinning; plastic waste; recycling; reutilizing
Year: 2022 PMID: 35630885 PMCID: PMC9146546 DOI: 10.3390/nano12101663
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Various management methods of plastic waste and their influence.
| Management | Advantages | Disadvantages | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Landfill | Convenience | Occupies large space/ | [ |
| Incineration | Recovery of thermal | Harmful to the | [ |
| Mechanical pulverization | Reused as materials | Remanufactured | [ |
| Microbial decomposition | Reduces secondary | Needs special conditions | [ |
| Thermal decomposition | Low pollution/ | Relatively complicated | [ |
| Physical and chemical | Recycled products with | Needs high-level | [ |
| Mechanical recycling | Economical/ | Difficult to recycle complex and contaminated polymer waste/Intense | [ |
Figure 1The mechanism of electrospinning. Reprinted from ref. [27].
Figure 2(a) Materials for electrospinning (b–f). Various technologies for electrospinning: (b) centrifugal electrospinning [29], (c) multi-jet electrospinning [30], (d) needleless electrospinning [31], (e) multi-hole electrospinning [32], and (f) gas-assisted electrospinning [33] (g–l) Special structures of electrospun fibers: (g) necklace-like fibers [34], (h) core-shell fibers [35], (i) hollow fibers [36], (j) porous fibers [37], (k) Janus fibers [38]. and (l) helical fibers [39]. (b,j) Reprinted with permission from ref. [29,37]. Copyright American Chemical Society. (c–i) Reprinted with permission from ref. [30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. Copyright Elsevier. (k) Reprinted with permission from ref. [38]. Copyright 2019 Springer. (l) Reprinted with permission from ref. [39]. Copyright 2020 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Summary of polymeric products (membranes or fibers) prepared from plastic waste sources of PET, PS, PA, etc., via electrospinning.
| Products | Origin | Performance Discussion (Indicator) | Application | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PET, PS, PC | Water bottles, styrofoam, | Elastic moduli: 15 to 60 MPa/ | Ultra/micro | [ |
| Tough mesomorphic fiber membranes | Coca Cola | Fiber diameters: 0.4 to 4.3 μm/ | Smoke | [ |
| PET | Beverage | Fiber diameters: 95 ± 37 nm/ | Filtration | [ |
| PET | PET bottles | Fiber diameters: 1.29 μm/ | Air filters | [ |
| PET fibers | Clear soda packaging | Mean fiber diameter: 3.25 to 0.65 μm/ Mechanical strength: 3.2 to 4.5 MPa/ High filtration efficiency (up to 99%) | Air/gas | [ |
| PET | Plastic water | Fiber diameters: 100 nm/ | Water | [ |
| Electrochemical active microporous carbon structure | Used PET bottles | The medium combines | Energy | [ |
| PET films on paper and textile materials | Used mineral water bottles | The impregnated with PET | Waterproof materials | [ |
| PET nanofibers | Used grade PET bottles, PET granule | Minimum fiber diameters: 61 to 93 nm (Produced by melt-electrospinning) | - | [ |
| PET nanofibers | Clear PET | Fiber diameters: 45 to 65 μm | - | [ |
| Colored PET | Recycled | Good colorfastness/ | Advanced | [ |
| PET | Recycled | Good colorfastness/ | Advanced | [ |
| PET/lignin | Waste water | Average fiber diameter: 191 ± 60 nm | Separators/ | [ |
| Sooth uniform | Waste PET | Minimum average fiber diameter: 105.03 ± 36.79 nm | - | [ |
| Lignin/recycled | Waste water | Average fiber diameter: 80 to 781 nm | - | [ |
| Carbon | Used PET | Average fiber diameter: 191 ± 60 nm/ The C content of the nanofibers: 94.3% | Advanced | [ |
| Adsorptive membranes | PET bottle waste | Cr(VI) removal capacity (5.54 mg/50 mg)/ | Removal of | [ |
| PDMS | Recycled PET pellets | Superoleophilic properties (oil contact angle of 0°)/ Anti-water-fouling properties/ High flux (~20,000 L m−2 h−1)/ High separation efficiency (>98%) | Oil/water | [ |
| Conductive PET nanofibers | Water bottles | Average fiber diameter of copper-coated r-PET nanofibers (700 nm)/ | Wearable | [ |
Figure 3(a–c) Micrographs of electrospun fibers with different concentrations of PET: (a) 10 wt%, (b) 15 wt%, (c) 20 wt%. (d) Schematic illustration of smoke filtration testing (e–f). Photographs of fiber mats: (e) before and (f) after smoke filtration testing. (g) IR-spectroscopy of clean fiber mats and smoke-exposed fiber mats with average fiber diameters of 0.4, 1.0 and 4.3 mm. Reprinted with permission from ref. [72]. Copyright 2015 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 4Process of recycled PET electrospinning and post-treatment. Reprinted with permission from ref. [97]. Copyright 2021 American Chemical Society.
Figure 5(a) Process of fabricating the PET core fibers from the recycled PETE1 recyclable beverage bottles. (b) The production process of PAni@PET core-shell fibers. (c) Morphology of the pure PET fibrous core. (d) PAni@PET core-shell structure. (e) SEM photograph of the exposed core. Reprinted with permission from ref. [99]. Copyright 2016 IOP Publishing.
Figure 6(a) Process of fabricating the 3D PPP aerogel from PET bottles. (b) Mechanisms for Michael addition reaction occurred during the surface modification process. (c–e) FESEM images of fibers: (c) pristine PET fibers, (d) pDA coated fibers (PET-pDA), and (e) PET-pDA-PEI (PPP) fibers. Reprinted with permission from ref. [104]. Copyright 2021 Elsevier.