| Literature DB >> 35630867 |
Kwang Hyun Park1, Jun Yong Yang1, Sunggyeong Jung1, Byoung Min Ko1, Gian Song1, Soon-Jik Hong1, Nam Chul Kim1, Dongju Lee2, Sung Ho Song1.
Abstract
Transition metal dichalcogenide-based quantum dots are promising materials for applications in diverse fields, such as sensors, electronics, catalysis, and biomedicine, because of their outstanding physicochemical properties. In this study, we propose bio-imaging characteristics through utilizing water-soluble MoS2 quantum dots (MoS2-QDs) with two different sizes (i.e., ~5 and ~10 nm). The structural and optical properties of the fabricated metallic phase MoS2-QDs (m-MoS2-QDs) were characterized by transmission electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, UV-vis absorption spectroscopy, and photoluminescence. The synthesized m-MoS2-QDs showed clear photophysical characteristic peaks derived from the quantum confinement effect and defect sites, such as oxygen functional groups. When the diameter of the synthesized m-MoS2-QD was decreased, the emission peak was blue-shifted from 436 to 486 nm under excitation by a He-Cd laser (325 nm). Density functional theory calculations confirmed that the size decrease of m-MoS2-QDs led to an increase in the bandgap because of quantum confinement effects. In addition, when incorporated into the bio-imaging of HeLa cells, m-MoS2-QDs were quite biocompatible with bright luminescence and exhibited low toxicity. Our results are commercially applicable for achieving high-performance bio-imaging probes.Entities:
Keywords: bio-imaging; density functional theory; quantum confinement; quantum dots; transition metal dichalcogenide
Year: 2022 PMID: 35630867 PMCID: PMC9144094 DOI: 10.3390/nano12101645
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Figure 1Schematic illustration and characterization of m-MoS2-QD I and m-MoS2-QD II (a) Fabrication steps of m-MoS2-QD I and m-MoS2-QD II. (b,c) AFM images. (d,e) HR-TEM images of m-MoS2-QD I and m-MoS2-QD II.
Figure 2(a) Raman spectra of 2H-MoS2, m-MoS2-QD I, and m-MoS2-QD II. XPS spectra of molybdenum and sulfur elements Mo 3d of 2H-MoS2, m-MoS2-QD I, and m-MoS2-QD II (b). S 2p of 2H-MoS2, m-MoS2-QD I, and m-MoS2-QD II (c). (d) FT-IR spectra of 2H-MoS2, m-MoS2-QD I, and m-MoS2-QD II.
Figure 3(a) Digital images of m-MoS2-QD I and m-MoS2-QD II. before (top) and after (down) UV illumination in water. (b) Bandgap of m-MoS2-QDs calculated by DFT. (c) Density of states of m-MoS2-QDs with different sizes. PLE spectra of m-MoS2-QD I (d) and m-MoS2-QD II (e) with varying excitation wavelength from 380 to 560 nm. 2D PLE spectra of PLE spectra of m-MoS2-QD I at 260 nm excitation (λEx) (f) and m-MoS2-QD II (g) at 360 nm excitation (λEx).
Figure 4(a) Cytotoxicity for mouse primary hepatocytes. (b) Multiphoton images depending on m-MoS2-QD concentration. (c) Mouse primary hepatocyte images with m-MoS2-QD after 24 h. Phase contrast image (top left), nucleus stained with DAPI (top right), green fluorescence of m-MoS2-QD (bottom left), and overlay image of DAPI and green m-MoS2-QD (bottom right). (d) Imaging after 0 weeks (left) and after 2 weeks (right).