| Literature DB >> 35630853 |
Jari S Algethami1, M Shamshi Hassan2, Ali Q Alorabi2, Nabil A Alhemiary1,3, Ahmed M Fallatah4, Yaser Alnaam5, Saleh Almusabi5, Touseef Amna6.
Abstract
Environmental pollution, especially water pollution caused by dyes, heavy metal ions and biological pathogens, is a root cause of various lethal diseases in human-beings and animals. Water purification materials and treatment methods are overpriced. Consequently, there is an imperative outlook observance for cheap materials for the purification of wastewaters. In order to fill up the projected demand for clean water, the present study aimed to make use of cost-effective and environmentally friendly methods to convert bone-waste from animals such as cows into novel composites for the decontamination of water. The bone-waste of slaughtered cows from the Najran region of Saudi Arabia was collected and used for the synthesis of hydroxyapatite based on the thermal method. The synthesized hydroxyapatite (Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2) was utilized to prepare a manganese ferrite/hydroxyapatite composite. The nanocomposite was categorized by diverse sophisticated procedures, for instance XRD, FE-SEM, EDX, TEM, UV, PL and FT-IR. This composite possesses outstanding photocatalytic activity against methylene blue dye, which is a common pollutant from industrial wastes. Moreover, the synthesised composite revealed exceptional bacteriostatic commotion towards E. coli and S. aureus bacteria, which are accountable for acute waterborne infections. The outcome of this study demonstrated that the integration of manganese ferrite into hydroxyapatite significantly intensified both antimicrobial and photocatalytic actions when compared to the virgin hydroxyapatite.Entities:
Keywords: bacteriostatic; manganese ferrite/hydroxyapatite composite; pathogens; photocatalysis; water pollution
Year: 2022 PMID: 35630853 PMCID: PMC9143517 DOI: 10.3390/nano12101631
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Figure 1XRD pattern of (a) HAP and (b) HAP-MnFe2O4 nanocomposite.
Figure 2FE-SEM images of (a,b) HAP and (c,d) HAP-MnFe2O4 at low and high magnifications. The yellow arrows indicate HAP nanoparticles, whereas the cyan arrows MnFe2O4 in the HAP-MnFe2O4 nanocomposite.
Figure 3EDX spectra of (a) HAP and (b) HAP-MnFe2O4 nanocomposite.
Figure 4(a) TEM and (b) HR-TEM spectra of HAP-MnFe2O4 nanocomposite; inset shows SAED pattern.
Figure 5FT−IR spectra of (a) HAP and (b) HAP−MnFe2O4.
Figure 6(A) UV–Vis diffuse reflection spectra and (B) plot of the transformed Kubelka–Munk function versus the gap energy of sample (a) HAP and (b) HAP−MnFe2O4 nanocomposite.
Figure 7PL spectra of (a) HAP and (b) HAP−MnFe2O4 nanocomposite.
Figure 8(A) Photocatalytic degradation of MB in the presence of sample (a) HAPs and (b) HAP-MnFe2O4. (B) Photodegradation efficiency of MB over HAP−MnFe2O4 in different recycles. (C) Trapping experiments of active species in the photocatalytic reaction.
Figure 9Bar graphics of (a) E. coli culture augmented with different quantities of HAP and HAP-MnFe2O4 nanocomposite (optimal expansion signifies E. coli and S. aureus in culture broth without HAP and HAP-MnFe2O4). Substantial difference (* p ≤ 0.05) was perceived in bacterial growth inhibition among control group and treatments at all concentrations. Significant difference in bacteriostatic impact with HAP and HAP-MnFe2O4 at higher amount was visualized. * p ≤ 0.05, *** p ≤ 0.001 significantly dissimilar from untreated control.
Scheme 1Plausible antibacterial mechanism of HAP-MnFe2O4 nanocomposites.