| Literature DB >> 35630562 |
Martina Vizza1, Patrick Marcantelli1, Claudia Giovani1, Walter Giurlani1,2, Paolo Giusti3, Claudio Fontanesi4, Massimo Innocenti1,2,5,6.
Abstract
Recently, the new updates in legislation about drinking water control and human health have increased the demand for novel electrochemical low-cost sensors, such as potentiometric ones. Nowadays, the determination of chloride ion in aqueous solutions has attracted great attention in several fields, from industrial processes to drinking water control. Indeed, chloride plays a crucial role in corrosion, also influencing the final taste of beverages, especially coffee. The main goal is to obtain devices suitable for continuous and real-time analysis. For these reasons, we investigated the possibility to develop an easy, low-cost potentiometric chloride sensor, able to perform analysis in aqueous mediums for long immersion time and reducing the need of periodic calibration. We realized a chloride ion selective electrode made of Ag/AgCl sintered pellet and we tested its response in model solutions compatible with drinking water. The sensor was able to produce a stable, reproducible, and accurate quantification of chloride in 900 s, without the need for a preliminary calibration test. This opens the route to potential applications of this sensor in continuous, in situ, and real time measurement of chloride ions in industrial processes, with a reduced need for periodic maintenance.Entities:
Keywords: ISE sensor; OCP; chloride determination; continuous monitoring; in situ measurements; industrial process control; low-cost sensor; potentiometry
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35630562 PMCID: PMC9144062 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27103087
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1OCP signal recorded for 900 s in 10 °fH solutions, with different chloride content (a: 5 mg/L; b: 10 mg/L; c: 20 mg/L; d: 30 mg/L; e: 40 mg/L; f: 50 mg/L; g: 75 mg/L; h: 100 mg/L).
Figure 2Chloride sensor’s OCP signal recorded in 900 s, in (a) 20 °fH, (b) 30 °fH and (c) 40 °fH solutions with different chloride content (a: 5 mg/L; b: 10 mg/L; c: 20 mg/L; d: 30 mg/L; e: 40 mg/L; f: 50 mg/L; g: 75 mg/L; h: 100 mg/L).
Figure 3Chloride sensor’s linearity response in (a) 10 °fH, (b) 20 °fH, (c) 30 °fH, (d) 40 °fH solutions with different chloride content (5–100 mg/L).
Slope, intercept and coefficient determination values of the sensor’s calibration curves in solutions with different hardness and chloride content (see Figure 3).
| Water Hardness (°fH) | Slope | Intercept | Coefficient of Determination (R2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 58.5 | 297.8 | 0.9998 |
| 20 | 56.1 | 291.3 | 0.9992 |
| 30 | 55.1 | 290.3 | 0.9993 |
| 40 | 54.2 | 290.1 | 0.9995 |
Arithmetical average and standard deviation of the sensor’s OCP response in 10–40 °fH solutions with different chloride content (5–100 mg/L).
| Water Hardness (°fH) | Chloride Content | OCP Arithmetical Average (mV) | Standard Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 5 | 250.2 | 6.4 |
| 10 | 236.5 | 2.0 | |
| 20 | 220.7 | 1.6 | |
| 30 | 210.1 | 1.4 | |
| 40 | 203.1 | 1.1 | |
| 50 | 197.9 | 0.9 | |
| 75 | 188.1 | 1.3 | |
| 100 | 181.1 | 1.0 | |
| 20 | 5 | 247.2 | 2.6 |
| 10 | 234.6 | 1.8 | |
| 20 | 218.2 | 1.4 | |
| 30 | 208.9 | 1.4 | |
| 40 | 201.9 | 1.2 | |
| 50 | 196.2 | 1.6 | |
| 75 | 186.2 | 1.6 | |
| 100 | 178.8 | 1.6 | |
| 30 | 5 | 244.9 | 3.7 |
| 10 | 234.0 | 1.8 | |
| 20 | 217.7 | 1.9 | |
| 30 | 207.3 | 2.7 | |
| 40 | 200.6 | 2.2 | |
| 50 | 195.3 | 2.6 | |
| 75 | 184.3 | 2.3 | |
| 100 | 177.7 | 1.9 | |
| 40 | 5 | 247.9 | 2.2 |
| 10 | 234.0 | 1.3 | |
| 20 | 216.7 | 1.7 | |
| 30 | 207.1 | 1.2 | |
| 40 | 199.2 | 1.5 | |
| 50 | 194.5 | 1.3 | |
| 75 | 184.1 | 1.1 | |
| 100 | 176.5 | 1.1 |
Arithmetical average and standard deviation values of the OCP response recorded for a certain chloride concentration (5–100 mg/L) in solutions with different hardness levels (10° fH–40 °fH) (see Table 2).
| Chloride Content | Arithmetical Average of OCP Recorded in 10 °fH–40 °fH Solutions | Standard Deviation |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 247.5 | 3.9 |
| 10 | 234.8 | 1.9 |
| 20 | 218.3 | 2.1 |
| 30 | 208.3 | 2.2 |
| 40 | 201.2 | 1.9 |
| 50 | 196.0 | 2.1 |
| 75 | 185.7 | 2.3 |
| 100 | 178.5 | 2.0 |
Figure 43D plot obtained using the multivariate analysis.