| Literature DB >> 35630348 |
Priscilla da Costa Martins1, Hugo Amorim Dos Santos de Souza1, Carolina Moreira Blanco1, Luana Santos-de-Oliveira1, Lilian Rose Pratt-Riccio1, Cláudio Tadeu Daniel-Ribeiro1, Paulo Renato Rivas Totino1.
Abstract
Signal regulatory protein α (SIRPα) is an immunoreceptor expressed in myeloid innate immune cells that signals for inhibition of both phagocytosis and inflammatory response. Malaria parasites have evolutionarily selected multiple mechanisms that allow them to evade host immune defenses, including the modulation of cells belonging to innate immunity. Notwithstanding, little attention has been given to SIRPα in the context of immunosuppressive states induced by malaria. The present study attempted to investigate if malaria parasites are endowed with the capacity of modulating the expression of SIRPα on cells of innate immune system. Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from healthy individuals were incubated in the presence of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or crude extracts of P. falciparum or P. vivax and then, the expression of SIRPα was evaluated by flow cytometry. As expected, LPS showed an inhibitory effect on the expression of SIRPα in the population of monocytes, characterized by cell morphology in flow cytometry analysis, while Plasmodium extracts induced a significant positive modulation. Additional phenotyping of cells revealed that the modulatory potential of Plasmodium antigens on SIRPα expression was restricted to the population of monocytes (CD14+CD11c+), as no effect on myeloid dendritic cells (CD14-CD11c+) was observed. We hypothesize that malaria parasites explore inhibitory signaling of SIRPα to suppress antiparasitic immune responses contributing to the establishment of infection. Nevertheless, further studies are still required to better understand the role of SIRPα modulation in malaria immunity and pathogenesis.Entities:
Keywords: LPS; P. falciparum; P. vivax; SIRPα; innate immune response
Year: 2022 PMID: 35630348 PMCID: PMC9144821 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10050903
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Figure 1Modulation of SIRPα expression by P. falciparum crude extract. PBMCs from healthy individuals were stimulated for 24 and 48 h with P. falciparum extract (10 µg/mL) or LPS (5 µg/mL) and SIRPα expression on cell surface of monocyte-like cells was evaluated by flow cytometry using APC-conjugated anti-SIRPα monoclonal antibody. (A,B) Representative cytometric analysis of SIRPα expression (B) in gated monocyte-like cells (A; P1) after stimulation with P. falciparum antigens (Pf) or LPS. (C) Levels of SIRPα expression on monocyte-like cells population (P1), as measured by mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). Non-stimulated PBMCs were used as control (Control). Data are shown as mean ± standard error (SEM) and represent one of two independent experiments performed with PBMC samples from five individuals. **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001.
Figure 2Dose-dependent effect of P. falciparum extract on SIRPα expression. PBMCs from healthy individuals were stimulated for 24 h with crescent concentrations of P. falciparum extract (Pf; 0.1, 1.0 and 10 µg/mL) or 5 µg/mL LPS and, the levels of SIRPα expression (MFI) on cell surface of monocyte-like cells was evaluated by flow cytometry, as in Figure 1. Data are shown as mean ± standard error (SEM) and represent one of two independent experiments performed with PBMC samples from five individuals. **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001, as compared with non-stimulated cells (Control).
Figure 3Modulation of SIRPα expression by P. vivax crude extract. PBMCs from healthy individuals were stimulated for 24 h with P. vivax extract (10 µg/mL) or LPS (5 µg/mL) and SIRPα expression on cell surface of monocyte-like cells was evaluated by flow cytometry using APC-conjugated anti-SIRPα monoclonal antibody. (A) Representative histogram analysis of SIRPα expression in gated monocyte-like cells after stimulation with P. vivax antigens or LPS. (B) Levels of SIRPα expression on monocyte-like cells population, as measured by mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). Non-stimulated PBMCs were used as control (Control). Data are shown as mean ± standard error (SEM) and represent one of two independent experiments performed with PBMC samples from five individuals. *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01.
Figure 4Cell type-specific modulation of SIRPα expression by P. falciparum crude extract. PBMCs from healthy individuals were stimulated for 24 h with P. falciparum extract (10 µg/mL) or LPS (5 µg/mL) and SIRPα expression on cell surface of monocytes and dencritic cells was evaluated by flow cytometry. (A) Representative phenotyping analysis of classical monocytes (P2; CD14+CD11+) and myeloid dendritic cells (P3; CD14−CD11+) populations. (B,C) Levels of SIRPα expression in gated monocytes (B) and dendritic cells (C), as measured by mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). Non-stimulated PBMCs were used as control (Control). Data are shown as mean ± standard error (SEM) and represent one of two independent experiments performed with PBMC samples from five individuals. *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001.