| Literature DB >> 35629838 |
Mira Abou-Diab1,2,3,4, Jacinthe Thibodeau1,2,3, Ismail Fliss1,3, Pascal Dhulster4, Laurent Bazinet1,2,3, Naima Nedjar4.
Abstract
Numerous studies have shown that bovine hemoglobin, a protein from slaughterhouse waste, has important biological potential after conventional enzymatic hydrolysis. However, the active peptides could not be considered pure since they contained mineral salts. Therefore, an optimized multi-step process of electrodialysis with bipolar membranes (EDBM) was carried out to produce discolored and demineralized peptides without the addition of chemical agents. The aim of this study was to test the antibacterial, antifungal and antioxidant activities of discolored and demineralized bovine hemoglobin hydrolysates recovered by EDBM and to compare them with raw and discolored hydrolysates derived from conventional hydrolysis. The results demonstrate that discolored-demineralized hydrolysates recovered from EDBM had significant antimicrobial activity against many bacterial (gram-positive and gram-negative) and fungal (molds and yeast) strains. Concerning antibacterial activity, lower MIC values for hydrolysates were registered against Staphylococcus aureus, Kocuria rhizophila and Listeria monocytogenes. For antifungal activity, lower MIC values for hydrolysates were registered against Paecilomyces spp., Rhodotorula mucilaginosa and Mucor racemosus. Hemoglobin hydrolysates showed fungicidal mechanisms towards these fungal strains since the MFC/MIC ratio was ≤4. The hydrolysates also showed a potent antioxidant effect in four different antioxidant tests. Consequently, they can be considered promising natural, low-salt food preservatives. To the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have identified the biological properties of discolored and demineralized bovine hemoglobin hydrolysates.Entities:
Keywords: antibacterial activity; antifungal activity; antioxidant activity; bovine hemoglobin; demineralized hydrolysates; discolored-demineralized hydrolysates; electrodialysis with bipolar membrane
Year: 2022 PMID: 35629838 PMCID: PMC9143934 DOI: 10.3390/membranes12050512
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Membranes (Basel) ISSN: 2077-0375
Figure 1Schematic representation of three-compartment bipolar membrane electrodialysis cell configuration for production of demineralized and discolored–demineralized hemoglobin hydrolysates running simultaneously used by Abou-Diab et al. [13]. BM, bipolar membrane; MCP, monovalent cation perm-selective membrane; AEM, anion exchange membrane.
Figure 2Diagram summarizing the hydrolysates recovered in each condition.
Antibacterial activity of bovine hemoglobin hydrolysates.
| Bacteria Strains | Bovine Hemoglobin Hydrolysates | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH-RH | CH-DH | EDBM-RH | EDBM-DH | |
|
| +++ | +++ | ++ | +++ |
|
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
|
| + | + | + | + |
|
| +++ | +++ | ++ | +++ |
|
| + | + | + | + |
|
| + | + | + | + |
Inhibition zones: +++: >1.5 cm; ++: 0.5–1.5 cm; +: <0.5 cm.
Figure 3Inhibition zones induced by 2 different concentrations (10 and 20 mg/mL) of raw and discolored bovine hemoglobin hydrolysates produced by two different hydrolysis processes on Muller-Hinton Agar overlaid with a suspension (106 strain per plate) of Staphylococcus aureus (A) and Kocuria rhizophila (B) and compared to a positive control (C+: ampicillin).
MIC values of the bovine hemoglobin hydrolysates.
| Bacteria Strains | Bovine Hemoglobin Hydrolysates | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIC | ||||
| CH-RH | CH-DH | EDBM-RH | EDBM-DH | |
| mg/mL | mg/mL | mg/mL | mg/mL | |
|
| 0.31 ± 0.0 b | 0.31 ± 0.0 b | 1.25 ± 0.0 a | 0.31 ± 0.0 b |
|
| 1.25 ± 0.0 b | 2.5 ± 0.0 a | 2.5 ± 0.0 a | 2.5 ± 0.0 a |
|
| 5 ± 0.0 b | 5 ± 0.0 b | 10 ± 0.0 a | 10 ± 0.0 a |
|
| 0.31 ± 0.0 b | 0.31 ± 0.0 b | 0.62 ± 0.0 a | 0.31 ± 0.0 b |
|
| 10 ± 0.0 a | 10 ± 0.0 a | 10 ± 0.0 a | 10 ± 0.0 a |
|
| 5 ± 0.0 b | 10 ± 0.0 a | 10 ± 0.0 a | 10 ± 0.0 a |
The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the peptide hydrolysates was determined in a microtiter plate assay system after 24 h of incubation at 37 °C. a,b: Population means for each bacteria strain within each row with different letters are significantly different, similar letter means no significant difference p < 0.05 (Tukey test).
Figure 4Inhibition zones induced by 2 different concentrations (10 and 20 mg/mL) of raw and discolored bovine hemoglobin hydrolysates produced by two different hydrolysis processes on potato dextrose agar (PDA) overlaid with a suspension (104 spores per plate) of Paecilomyces spp. (A) and Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (B) and compared to a positive (C+: natamycin) and negative control (C−: distilled water).
In vitro MIC and MFC ranges of CH-RH, CH-DH, EDBM-RH and EDBM-DH against filamentous molds and yeast as determined by broth microdilution followed by visual examination.
| Bovine Hemoglobin Hydrolysates (mg/mL) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH-RH | CH-DH | EDBM-RH | EDBM-DH | |||||||||
| Fungal Strain | MIC | MFC | MFC/MIC | MIC | MFC | MFC/MIC | MIC | MFC | MFC/MIC | MIC | MFC | MFC/MIC |
| 0.44 ± 0.0 b | 0.44 ± 0.0 C | 1 | 0.44 ± 0.0 b | 0.44 ± 0.0 C | 1 | 0.89 ± 0.0 a | 0.89 ± 0.0 B | 1 | 0.44 ± 0.0 b | 1.78 ± 0.0 A | 4 | |
|
| 7.15 ± 0.0 a | 0.0 ± 0.0 A | ND | 7.15 ± 0.0 a | 0.0 ± 0.0 A | ND | 7.15 ± 0.0 a | 0.0 ± 0.0 A | ND | 7.15 ± 0.0 a | 0.0 ± 0.0 A | ND |
|
| 0.89 ± 0.0 c | 1.78 ± 0.0 C | 2 | 1.78 ± 0.0 b | 7.15 ± 0.0 B | 4 | 3.57 ± 0.0 a | 14.3 ± 0.0 A | 4 | 1.78 ± 0.0 b | 7.15 ± 0.0 B | 4 |
|
| 3.57 ± 0.0 b | 7.15 ± 0.0 A | 2 | 3.57 ± 0.0 b | 3.57 ± 0.0 B | 1 | 7.15 ± 0.0 a | 7.15 ± 0.0 A | 1 | 3.57 ± 0.0 b | 7.15 ± 0.0 A | 2 |
|
| 7.15 ± 0.0 a | 0.0 ± 0.0 A | ND | 7.15 ± 0.0 a | 0.0 ± 0.0 A | ND | 7.15 ± 0.0 a | 0.0 ± 0.0 A | ND | 7.15 ± 0.0 a | 0.0 ± 0.0 A | ND |
ND, not determined. For each strain, different lowercase letters indicate significant difference between conditions for MIC; different capital letters indicate significant difference between conditions for MFC; similar letters mean no significant difference, p < 0.05 (Tukey test).
Figure 5β-carotene bleaching inhibition activity of bovine hemoglobin hydrolysates at different concentrations in CH-RH, CH-DH, EDBM-RH and EDBM-DH. Values with (*) symbol are significantly different from BHT; values with (†) symbol are significantly different from neokyotorphin; values with different lowercase letters (a–c) within the same concentration are significantly different; values with different capital letters (A–D) within the same condition are significantly different (p < 0.05, Tukey test).
IC50 and Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) coefficients of bovine hemoglobin hydrolysates for the DPPH method.
| DPPH | CH-RH | CH-DH | EDBM-RH | EDBM-DH | NKT | Trolox |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IC50 (mg/mL) | 2.52 ± 0.01 b | 2.77 ± 0.03 a | 2.39 ± 0.09 c | 2.29 ± 0.04 d | 0.58 ± 0.02 e | 0.36 ± 0.01 f |
| TEAC | 0.14 ± 0.002 d | 0.13 ± 0.005 e | 0.15 ± 0.001 c | 0.15 ± 0.003 c | 0.64 ± 0.01 b | 1 a |
a–f: Mean values within each row with different letters are significantly different; similar letters mean no significant difference at a probability level of 0.05 (Tukey test).
Figure 6ABTS scavenging activities of bovine hemoglobin hydrolysates in CH-RH, CH-DH, EDBM-RH and EDBM-DH at different concentrations. Values with different lowercase letters (a,b) within the same concentration are significantly different; values with different capital letters (A–D) within the same condition are significantly different (p < 0.05, Tukey test).
IC50 and TEAC coefficients of bovine hemoglobin hydrolysates for ABTS method.
| ABTS | CH-RH | CH-DH | EDBM-RH | EDBM-DH | NKT | Trolox |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IC50 (mg/mL) | 3.91 ± 0.02 b | 4.00 ± 0.02 a | 3.54 ± 0.01 c | 3.43 ± 0.02 d | 0.56 ± 0.02 e | 0.50 ± 0.02 f |
| TEAC | 0.12 ± 0.004 d | 0.12 ± 0.005 d | 0.14 ± 0.005 c | 0.14 ± 0.005 c | 0.89 ± 0.03 b | 1 a |
a–f: Mean values within each row with different letters are significantly different, similar letters mean no significant difference p < 0.05 (ANOVA, Tukey test).
Figure 7Total antioxidant capacity of bovine hemoglobin hydrolysates in CH-RH, CH-DH, EDBM-RH and EDBM-DH at different concentrations. Values with different lowercase letters (a,b) within the same concentration are significantly different; values with different capital letters (A–D) within the same condition are significantly different (p < 0.05, Tukey test).