| Literature DB >> 35629760 |
Fengbin Zhou1, Changwang Su1, Daifeng Wu2, Jianmin Hua1, Lepeng Huang1, Qiming Luo1, Maoyi Liu2, Mi Nie2, Chunyao Tang1.
Abstract
The risk of cracking in the early stage is a critical indicator of the performance of concrete structures. Concrete cracked when the tensile stresses caused by deformation under restraint conditions exceeded its tensile strength. This research aims at an accurate prediction of shrinkage cracking of concrete under constraints. Based on the theory of capillary tension under the concrete shrinkage mechanism, the method to test and compute the elastic modulus of a micro-matrix around the capillary, Et, was derived. Shrinkage and porosity determination tests were conducted to obtain the shrinkage values and confining stresses of concrete at different strength grades, different ages and under different restraint conditions, accordingly. Meanwhile, the proposed method of this research was used to obtain Et. The restraint stress given by Et was compared with the experimental result under the corresponding time. The results suggested a positive correlation between the elastic modulus of a micro-matrix around the capillary, Et, precomputed by the theory, and the static elastic modulus, Ec, and that the ratio between the two gradually decreased with the passage of time, which ranged from 2.8 to 3.1.Entities:
Keywords: concrete elasticity modulus; early cracking; free shrinkage; restraint stress; theory of capillary tension
Year: 2022 PMID: 35629760 PMCID: PMC9148096 DOI: 10.3390/ma15103734
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the elastic modulus of a micro-matrix around the capillary ().
Figure 2Schematic diagram of constrained shrinkage in concrete.
Figure 3Schematic diagram of the field test situation.
Chemical components and physical characteristics of cementing materials.
| Composition% (Mass) | Portland Cement | Fly Ash |
|---|---|---|
| SiO2 | 24.36 | 46.53 |
| CaO | 67.35 | 4.45 |
| Al2O3 | 5.48 | 22.07 |
| Fe2O3 | 4.36 | 15.01 |
| MgO | 1.42 | 1.22 |
| SO3 | 0.54 | 1.36 |
| Specific surface (cm2/g) | 3360 | 4723 |
| Density (g/cm3) | 3.13 | 2.35 |
| SiO2 | 24.36 | 46.53 |
Concrete mixing ratios (kg/m3).
| Mix | Water–Binder Ratio | Water | Cement | Fly Ash | Sand | CA | Polycarboxylate Superplasticizer (PS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C30 | 0.56 | 195 | 346 | 70 | 804 | 1091 | 9.0 |
| C40 | 0.48 | 170 | 353 | 67 | 762 | 1083 | 90.2 |
| C50 | 0.40 | 160 | 401 | 58 | 721 | 1071 | 11.3 |
| C60 | 0.32 | 154 | 482 | 48 | 680 | 1064 | 12.7 |
List of test specimens.
| No. | Strength Level | Thickness of Steel Plates (mm) | Number of Specimens |
|---|---|---|---|
| C30 | C30 | 0 | 3 |
| C30-20 | 20 | ||
| C30-40 | 40 | ||
| C30-60 | 60 | ||
| C40 | C40 | 0 | |
| C40-20 | 20 | ||
| C40-40 | 40 | ||
| C40-60 | 60 | ||
| C50 | C50 | 0 | |
| C50-20 | 20 | ||
| C50-40 | 40 | ||
| C50-60 | 60 | ||
| C60 | C60 | 0 | |
| C60-20 | 20 | ||
| C60-40 | 40 | ||
| C60-60 | 60 |
Notes: C30-40 refers to the 40 mm-thick steel plate specimens placed in C30 concrete. Other signs can be interpreted by analogy.
Figure 4Concrete shrinkage, internal temperature and humidity measuring devices (dimensions in mm).
Figure 5Core sampling method.
Characteristics of steel plates.
| Material | EM (104 MPa) | Yield Strength (MPa) | Ultimate Strength (MPa) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steel plate | Q235B | 20.6 | 260.0 | 460 |
Characteristics of steel plates.
| Mix Ratio | Age (Days) | Physical Properties | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cubic Compressive Strength (MPa) | Splitting Strength (MPa) | EM (104 MPa) | ||
| C30 | 2 | - | - | 15.6 |
| 3 | 21.2 | 1.32 | 22.7 | |
| 4 | - | 1.51 | 26.1 | |
| 5 | - | 1.69 | 27.2 | |
| 7 | 23.1 | 1.96 | 28.3 | |
| 14 | 26.9 | 2.21 | 29.1 | |
| 28 | 29.6 | 2.36 | 30.3 | |
| C40 | 2 | - | - | 16.7 |
| 3 | 25.8 | 1.62 | 23.4 | |
| 4 | - | 1.81 | 27.6 | |
| 5 | - | 1.93 | 28.5 | |
| 7 | 28.1 | 2.15 | 29.6 | |
| 14 | 34.3 | 2.39 | 31.0 | |
| 28 | 40.6 | 2.53 | 32.5 | |
| C50 | 2 | - | - | 17.1 |
| 3 | 33.6 | 1.75 | 25.5 | |
| 4 | - | 2.01 | 28.3 | |
| 5 | - | 2.21 | 29.1 | |
| 7 | 43.9 | 2.35 | 30.9 | |
| 14 | 47.3 | 2.64 | 33.7 | |
| 28 | 51.6 | 2.81 | 34.5 | |
| C60 | 2 | - | - | 17.4 |
| 3 | 52.3 | 2.03 | 26.1 | |
| 4 | - | 2.30 | 28.7 | |
| 5 | - | 2.54 | 29.3 | |
| 7 | 59.6 | 2.75 | 31.7 | |
| 14 | 60.1 | 3.09 | 34.4 | |
| 28 | 63.1 | 3.30 | 35.2 | |
Figure 6Concrete shrinkage curve changing with time.
Pore characteristic parameters of specimens constrained by steel plates.
| Age (Days) | Critical Capillary Diameter (nm) | Porosity (%) | Average Pore Diameter (nm) | Median Pore Diameter (nm) | Pore Distribution (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <10 nm | 10–50 nm | 50–100 nm | >100 nm | ||||||
| C30 | 2 | 102.54 | 23.15 | 26.81 | 67.51 | 5.78 | 26.15 | 33.16 | 34.91 |
| 3 | 91.00 | 21.11 | 23.54 | 63.4 | 13.21 | 24.44 | 36.07 | 26.28 | |
| 4 | 55.36 | 20.63 | 22.81 | 50.13 | 21.59 | 30.16 | 24.64 | 23.61 | |
| 5 | 47.27 | 18.61 | 21.18 | 44.94 | 25.09 | 41.31 | 15.69 | 17.91 | |
| 7 | 35.86 | 16.68 | 19.13 | 44.73 | 10.24 | 65.84 | 11.62 | 12.29 | |
| 14 | 24.23 | 15.81 | 17.63 | 40.31 | 13.21 | 66.24 | 9.81 | 10.74 | |
| 28 | 22.71 | 12.62 | 14.94 | 27.91 | 14.92 | 70.83 | 3.72 | 10.53 | |
| C40 | 2 | 96.42 | 94.55 | 22.91 | 24.61 | 64.31 | 11.44 | 27.12 | 29.32 |
| 3 | 84.65 | 65.59 | 21.16 | 21.55 | 48.55 | 14.87 | 25.64 | 35.18 | |
| 3 | 51.09 | 56.65 | 19.17 | 21.61 | 45.54 | 21.79 | 25.19 | 33.81 | |
| 5 | 36.49 | 45.36 | 18.73 | 18.31 | 42.16 | 16.63 | 43.85 | 25.61 | |
| 7 | 27.95 | 41.01 | 18.63 | 16.74 | 31.86 | 12.49 | 66.01 | 10.32 | |
| 14 | 23.04 | 27.37 | 17.33 | 16.15 | 29.31 | 12.94 | 66.99 | 9.11 | |
| 28 | 18.64 | 21.38 | 15.35 | 13.57 | 20.89 | 12.97 | 72.31 | 4.81 | |
| C50 | 2 | 93.33 | 93.33 | 21.81 | 23.61 | 61.87 | 11.45 | 26.98 | 30.48 |
| 3 | 79.56 | 65.29 | 21.02 | 22.72 | 56.04 | 16.39 | 26.31 | 34.31 | |
| 4 | 50.38 | 55.36 | 18.84 | 21.61 | 53.16 | 14.32 | 35.19 | 32.18 | |
| 5 | 36.22 | 42.7 | 18.66 | 19.61 | 46.15 | 7.52 | 53.81 | 22.16 | |
| 7 | 26.05 | 32.28 | 17.52 | 18.08 | 38.23 | 9.73 | 67.81 | 11.55 | |
| 14 | 22.03 | 26.38 | 15.64 | 16.31 | 35.31 | 10.99 | 70.31 | 8.09 | |
| 28 | 17.29 | 19.62 | 13.96 | 13.13 | 19.39 | 10.77 | 74.56 | 5.51 | |
| C60 | 2 | 86.67 | 86.67 | 21.36 | 21.81 | 52.31 | 12.74 | 24.16 | 33.94 |
| 3 | 71.37 | 55.15 | 19.24 | 20.84 | 41.43 | 10.08 | 69.4 | 6.37 | |
| 4 | 41.84 | 41.87 | 18.61 | 18.61 | 33.98 | 26.86 | 49.41 | 11.12 | |
| 5 | 27.42 | 33.78 | 17.78 | 18.03 | 29.61 | 24.49 | 50.16 | 13.61 | |
| 7 | 21.54 | 27.84 | 17.4 | 15.53 | 25.15 | 17.8 | 68.67 | 3.07 | |
| 14 | 18.93 | 23.45 | 16.87 | 14.54 | 24.38 | 20.33 | 65.21 | 4.59 | |
| 28 | 15.15 | 17.54 | 13.45 | 12.67 | 17.62 | 28.67 | 61.74 | 0.83 | |
Capillary tension on concrete at four ages (MPa).
| 2 Days | 3 Days | 4 Days | 5 Days | 7 Days | 14 Days | 28 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C30 | 1.42 | 1.60 | 2.63 | 3.08 | 4.06 | 6.01 | 6.41 |
| C40 | 1.51 | 1.72 | 2.85 | 3.99 | 5.21 | 6.32 | 7.81 |
| C50 | 1.56 | 1.83 | 2.89 | 4.02 | 5.59 | 6.61 | 8.42 |
| C60 | 1.68 | 2.04 | 3.48 | 5.31 | 6.76 | 7.69 | 9.61 |
Figure 7Fitting curve of elastic modulus of a micro-matrix around the capillary () and static elastic modulus ().
Figure 8The development trend of the elastic modulus of a micro-matrix around the capillary ().
Elastic modulus comparative analysis.
| EM (104 MPa) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (h) | C30 | C40 | C50 | C60 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 48~72 | 19.15 | 0.28 | 68.39 | 20.3 | 0.31 | 65.48 | 21.3 | 0.32 | 66.56 | 21.75 | 0.37 | 58.78 |
| 72~96 | 24.4 | 4.29 | 5.69 | 25.3 | 5.38 | 4.70 | 26.9 | 5.58 | 4.82 | 27.4 | 5.76 | 4.76 |
| 96~120 | 26.65 | 5.63 | 4.73 | 27.61 | 5.7 | 4.84 | 28.7 | 5.95 | 4.82 | 29 | 6.1 | 4.75 |
| 120~168 | 27.75 | 7.54 | 3.68 | 29.05 | 7.63 | 3.81 | 30 | 7.85 | 3.82 | 30.5 | 8.06 | 3.78 |
| 168~336 | 28.7 | 9.75 | 2.94 | 30.3 | 10.09 | 3.00 | 32.3 | 10.2 | 3.17 | 33.05 | 10.33 | 3.20 |
| 336~672 | 29.7 | 10 | 2.97 | 31.75 | 10.64 | 2.98 | 34.1 | 11.31 | 3.02 | 34.8 | 12.0 | 2.9 |
Figure 9Cracking schematic diagram: (a) Steel plate thickness is 60 mm; (b) steel plate thickness is 40 mm; (c) steel plate thickness is 20 m.
Cracking observation.
| Initial Cracking Time | Average Number of Cracks | Maximum Crack Width | Maximum Crack Length | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (h) | (mm) | (mm) | ||
| C30-60 | 84 | 3 | 0.12 | 33 |
| C30-40 | 90 | 5 | 0.08 | 31 |
| C30-20 | 113 | 5 | 0.10 | 35 |
| C40-60 | 84 | 10 | 0.18 | 41 |
| C40-40 | 90 | 8 | 0.15 | 33 |
| C40-20 | 97 | 9 | 0.16 | 35 |
| C50-60 | 88 | 16 | 0.21 | 43 |
| C50-40 | 91 | 9 | 0.15 | 36 |
| C50-20 | 95 | 12 | 0.13 | 45 |
| C60-60 | 75 | 5 | 0.28 | 63 |
| C60-40 | 83 | 14 | 0.18 | 45 |
| C60-20 | 86 | 15 | 0.2 | 35 |
Figure 10Concrete cracking time schematic diagram: (a) C30; (b) C40; (c) C50; (d) C60.
Cracking prediction.
| Predicted Cracking Time (h) | True Cracking Time (h) | |
|---|---|---|
| C30-60 | 72~96 | 84 |
| C30-40 | 72~96 | 90 |
| C30-20 | 120~144 | 113 |
| C40-60 | 72~96 | 84 |
| C40-40 | 72~96 | 90 |
| C40-20 | 96~120 | 97 |
| C50-60 | 72~96 | 88 |
| C50-40 | 72~96 | 91 |
| C50-20 | 72~96 | 95 |
| C60-60 | 72~96 | 75 |
| C60-40 | 72~96 | 83 |
| C60-20 | 72~96 | 86 |