| Literature DB >> 35629468 |
Mariafrancesca Cascione1, Valeria De Matteis1, Francesca Persano1,2, Stefano Leporatti2.
Abstract
Natural halloysite clay nanotubes (HNTs) are versatile inorganic reinforcing materials for creating hybrid composites. Upon doping HNTs with polymers, coating, or loading them with bioactive molecules, the production of novel nanocomposites is possible, having specific features for several applications. To investigate HNTs composites nanostructures, AFM is a very powerful tool since it allows for performing nano-topographic and morpho-mechanical measurements in any environment (air or liquid) without treatment of samples, like electron microscopes require. In this review, we aimed to provide an overview of recent AFM investigations of HNTs and HNT nanocomposites for unveiling hidden characteristics inside them envisaging future perspectives for AFM as a smart device in nanomaterials characterization.Entities:
Keywords: atomic force microscopy; halloysite clay nanotubes; nanocomposites; surface properties
Year: 2022 PMID: 35629468 PMCID: PMC9146693 DOI: 10.3390/ma15103441
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Figure 1(A) AFM working principle: the probe, which includes a tip fixed to the free end of a flexible cantilever, scans the sample, and punctually interacts with its surface; this induces a change in cantilever deflection that is recorded by means of different techniques, mainly using the optical lever system. The processing signals generated by these interactions allows for analyzing local properties of the object. The principal AFM operating mode was schematically represented: (B) Contact and (C) Tapping Modes. These modes are essentially used to visualize at high resolution the topography of samples and to obtain information about superficial features. (D,E) represent force spectroscopy operation mode. Both allow for simultaneously collecting in a single scan topography and mechanical properties on the surface of organic or inorganic materials [9]. Quantitative Nanoscale Mechanical (QNM) can be carried out in non-resonance (i.e., contact) mode or in resonance mode (i.e., tapping). In detail: (D) Force Volume (FV) combines topographic acquisition in contact mode with repetitive indentation techniques in which Force−vs.−Distance curves were acquired; otherwise, (E) QNM combines topographic acquisition in tapping mode and Amplitude-vs.-Distance curves or Frequency-vs.-Distance curves recording. In (E) 1–5: Sequence of typical AFM cantilever cycling in QNM acquisition.
Figure 2Schematic representation crystalline structure (a), cavity (b), water solution (c), and SEM acquisition of HNTs (d), adapted from [23].
AFM analysis of HNTs-nanocomposites with related AFM mode employed, AFM type used, and relative AFMs’ specific advantages and disadvantages.
| HNT-Based | AFM Modes | AFM Type | Limitations | Advantages | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chitosan/HNTs | Contact mode | Multimode Nanoscope IIIA (Bruker®, Billerica, MA, USA) | Bio nano composites Deformation upon Scanning | Analysis of Composites Roughness and Mechanical Properties | Liu et al., 2012 [ |
| Alginate/(HNTs) composite scaffolds | Contact mode | Multimode Nanoscope IIIA (Bruker®) | Composites Deformation upon Scanning | Analysis of Topography, Surface Roughness, and Interaction Properties | Liu et al., 2015 [ |
| Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA)/Starch (ST)/Glycerol (GL)/HNTs Bionanocomposite Films | Tapping mode | Dimension Fast Scan (Bruker®); | Composites Aggregation | Inspection of HNTs Aspect Ratio correlated to Composites Permeability Model | Abdullah et al., 2019 [ |
| PVA/PVP/HNTs | Tapping mode | FLEX-AXIOM AFM (Nano surf® Easy Scan 2, Lisstaal, Switzerland); | Bio composites dispersion aggregation | Investigation of Mechanical, Roughness and Thermal Properties | Kouser et al., 2022 [ |
| NTs/PDA/PF Nanocomposites | Tapping Mode | Multimode Compact Frame (Bruker®); | Nanocomposite aggregation | Analysis of Nano Topography and Roughness | Hatami et al., 2020 [ |
| Polysulfone/HNTs | Tapping QNM | Dimension Icon (Bruker®); | Sample Porosity | Inspection of Adhesion, Roughness, and HNTs Distribution in the Matrix | Kamal et al., 2020 [ |
| Keratin/HNTs | Tapping QNM | Dimension Icon (Bruker®); | HNT Stability/Adhesion during Scanning | Investigation of Mechanical, and Adhesive Properties | Cavallaro et al., 2020 [ |
| Mg, and Mg-DNA HNTs | Tapping QNM | Dimension Icon (Bruker®); | HNTs-DNA binding in the Lumen vs. Exterior Surface Undetectable | Analysis of Surface Adhesive and Mechanical Properties | Batasheva et al., 2020 [ |
| PMMA/HNTs | Semi Contact Mode | AFM INTEGRA (NT-MDT® Spectrum Instr., Moscow, Russia) | HNTs -PMMA Adhesion/Coating | Analysis of Surface Topography, and quantification of Roughness and Young Modulus | Cascione et al., 2021 [ |
| Epoxy/HNTs | Force vs. Distance Curves | Multimode Nanoscope IIIA (Bruker®); | Corrosion Resistance and Adhesion | Investigation of Mechanical Properties | Shi et al., 2009 [ |
Figure 3AFM analysis performed on PMMA/HNTs and PMMA/TiO2NPs nanocomposites. (a) topographical acquisitions in the height (left) and deflection (right) channel; (b) root main square roughness analysis (p-value < 0.005 ***); (c) representative nanoindentation curves (only approach data portion) acquired on different samples; and (d) Young’s modulus values analysis (p-value< 0.005 ***); (e) three−dimensional AFM topographical acquisitions, performed on different PMMA−based substrates after 24 and 48 h of C. Albicans colonization (adapted with permission from Ref. [64]).
Figure 4AFM topographic images of pristine (A), Mg (B), and Mg-DNA (C) modified halloysite nanotubes (adapted with permission from Ref. [63]).