| Literature DB >> 35629257 |
Kuan-Cheng Chang1,2, Ke-Wei Chen1, Chieh-Liang Huang3, Wen-Ling Liao4,5, Mei-Yao Wu6,7, Yu-Kai Lin1,2, Yi-Tzone Shiao8, Wei-Hsin Chung1,2, Yen-Nien Lin1,2, Hsien-Yuan Lane2,9.
Abstract
Background: The effects of methadone-induced severe prolongation of the corrected QT interval (QTc) and sudden cardiac death appear unpredictable and sex-dependent. Genetic polymorphisms in the nitric oxide synthase 1 adaptor protein (NOS1AP) have been implicated in QTc prolongation in general populations. We investigated whether common NOS1AP variants interact with methadone in relation to QTc prolongation in patients with heroin dependence.Entities:
Keywords: NOS1AP; QTc interval; heroin-dependence; methadone
Year: 2022 PMID: 35629257 PMCID: PMC9143734 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12050835
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pers Med ISSN: 2075-4426
Demographics and clinical data of study patients.
| Variables | Cohort 1 ( | Cohort 2 ( | Total ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 37.65 ± 8.05 | 36.9 ± 7.86 | 37.1 ± 7.91 | 0.373 |
|
| ||||
| Male | 103 (84.43%) | 262 (82.13%) | 365 (82.77%) | 0.568 |
| Female | 19 (15.57%) | 57 (17.87%) | 76 (17.23%) | |
|
| 42.54 ± 22.17 | 26.08 ± 15.84 | 30.64 ± 19.26 |
|
|
| 426.85 ± 22.73 | 422.7 ± 22.2 | 423.85 ± 22.4 | 0.082 |
|
| 380.42 ± 52.2 | 377.18 ± 28.03 | 378.08 ± 36.32 | 0.517 |
|
| 75.14 ± 13.31 | 76.98 ± 13.1 | 76.48 ± 13.17 | 0.192 |
|
| 11 (8–13) | 10 (8–13) | 10 (8–13) | 0.206 |
|
| 0.85 (0.74–0.95) | 0.83 (0.73–0.93) | 0.83 (0.73–0.93) | 0.204 |
|
| 138 (136–140) | 138 (136–140) | 138 (136–140) | 0.545 |
|
| 3.6 (3.4–4.2) | 3.8 (3.5–4.1) | 3.8 (3.5–4.1) | 0.185 |
|
| 8.7 (8.5–9) | 8.95 (8.6–9.15) | 8.8 (8.6–9.1) | 0.311 |
|
| 30 (24–40) | 31 (24–48) | 31 (24–44) | 0.637 |
|
| 33 (24–55) | 34 (22–59) | 33.5 (23–57) | 0.596 |
|
| 22 (16–36) | 27 (17–47) | 25 (17–44) |
|
|
| ||||
| Normal | 89 (77.39%) | 208 (67.97%) | 297 (70.55%) | 0.059 |
| Abnormal | 26 (22.61%) | 98 (32.03%) | 124 (29.45%) | |
|
| ||||
| Normal | 62 (53.91%) | 156 (50.81%) | 218 (51.66%) | 0.571 |
| Abnormal | 53 (46.09%) | 151 (49.19%) | 204 (48.34%) | |
|
| ||||
| Normal | 93 (82.3%) | 236 (78.41%) | 329 (79.47%) | 0.382 |
| Abnormal | 20 (17.7%) | 65 (21.59%) | 85 (20.53%) | |
|
| ||||
| No | 92 (80.7%) | 254 (86.69%) | 346 (85.01%) | 0.129 |
| Yes | 22 (19.3%) | 39 (13.31%) | 61 (14.99%) | |
|
| ||||
| No | 22 (19.3%) | 56 (19.11%) | 78 (19.16%) | 0.966 |
| Yes | 92 (80.7%) | 237 (80.89%) | 329 (80.84%) | |
|
| ||||
| Negative | 88 (76.52%) | 233 (75.16%) | 321 (75.53%) | 0.772 |
| Positive | 27 (23.48%) | 77 (24.84%) | 104 (24.47%) | |
|
| ||||
| No | 120 (100%) | 318 (100%) | 438 (100%) | 1.000 |
| Yes | 0 (0%) | 0(0%) | 0 (0%) | |
|
| ||||
| No | 120 (100%) | 318 (100%) | 438 (100%) | 1.000 |
| Yes | 0 (0%) | 0(0%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Self-reported ketamine use | ||||
| No | 120 (100%) | 318 (100%) | 438 (100%) | 1.000 |
| Yes | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
|
| ||||
| Estazolam | 1 (0.82%) | 2 (0.63%) | 3 (0.68%) | |
| Flunitrazepam | 17 (13.92%) | 29 (9.12%) | 46 (10.43%) | |
| Flunitrazepam/Estazolam | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.31%) | 1 (0.23%) | |
| Flunitrazepam/Lorazepam | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.31%) | 1 (0.23%) | |
| Flunitrazepam/Zolpidem | 1 (0.82%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.23%) | |
| Tramadol | 0 (0%) | 2 (0.63%) | 2 (0.45%) | |
| Zolpidem | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.31%) | 1 (0.23%) | |
| Clonazepam | 1 (0.82%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.23%) | |
|
| 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1.000 |
|
| 0 (0%) | 2 (0.63%) | 2 (0.45%) | |
|
| 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1.000 |
All values are expressed as the mean ± SD, median (Q1–Q3), or n (%) as appropriate. a: According to the classification of the Arizona Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics. Abbreviations: BUN, blood urea nitrogen; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; γGT, γ-glutamyltransferase; HBs Ag, Hepatitis B surface antigen; HCV Ab, hepatitis C antibody; MDMA, 3,4-methylenedioxy-N-methylamphetamine; TdP, torsades de pointes ventricular tachycardia.
Figure 1Effects of methadone maintenance treatment, methadone dose, and age on QTc intervals. (A) In Cohort 1, the QTc intervals significantly prolonged compared to the baseline values after methadone treatment in total (427 ± 22.7 vs. 421 ± 23.2 ms, p = 0.005) and in male patients (426 ± 22.6 vs. 420 ± 22.3 ms, p = 0.003), but not in female patients (429 ± 23.7 vs. 428 ± 27.2 ms, p = 0.842). (B) A significant positive correlation between age and QTc interval was observed before the administration of methadone in Cohort 1 patients. (C) During maintenance methadone treatment, we found a significant positive correlation between methadone dose and the age-adjusted QTc interval was observed in total and in male patients, but a negative correlation in females.
Association between NOS1AP variants and QTc intervals during maintenance methadone treatment after adjusting for age, gender, and methadone dose.
| Frequency_n (%) | HW_ | Adjusted QTc (ms) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs1415257 | ||||
| GG | 204 (46.7%) | 0.663 | 425.5 ± 1.6 | Ref |
| GA | 192 (43.9%) | 422.9 ± 1.6 | 0.247 | |
| AA | 41 (9.4%) | 419.5 ± 3.5 | 0.114 | |
| rs10494366 | ||||
| GG | 205 (46.7%) | 1 | 425.3 ± 1.5 | Ref |
| GT | 190 (43.3%) | 422.9 ± 1.6 | 0.279 | |
| TT | 44 (10%) | 420.1 ± 3.3 | 0.158 | |
| rs1572495 | ||||
| CC | 290 (67%) | 0.655 | 423.9 ± 1.3 | Ref |
| CT | 127 (29.3%) | 423.9 ± 2 | 0.991 | |
| TT | 16 (3.7%) | 421 ± 5.6 | 0.623 | |
| rs945713 | ||||
| CC | 246 (57.1%) | 0.338 | 423.8 ± 1.4 | Ref |
| CT | 164 (38.1%) | 423.6 ± 1.7 | 0.949 | |
| TT | 21 (4.9%) | 427.3 ± 4.9 | 0.491 | |
| rs1415263 | ||||
| TT | 134 (30.9%) | 424.3 ± 1.9 | Ref | |
| TC | 215 (49.7%) | 0.888 | 424.4 ± 1.5 | 0.948 |
| CC | 84 (19.4%) | 420.9 ± 2.4 | 0.270 | |
| rs6683968 | ||||
| TT | 133 (30.6%) | 424.8 ± 1.9 | Ref | |
| TG | 219 (50.3%) | 0.671 | 424.6 ± 1.5 | 0.938 |
| GG | 83 (19.1%) | 420.3 ± 2.4 | 0.158 | |
| rs2661818 | ||||
| GG | 291 (66%) | 424.2 ± 1.5 | Ref | |
| GC | 129 (29.3%) | 0.177 | 423.5 ± 1.9 | 0.771 |
| CC | 21 (4.8%) | 419.7 ± 2.4 | 0.371 | |
| rs3751284 | ||||
| AA | 133 (30.6%) | 422 ± 2.3 | Ref | |
| AG | 219 (50.3%) | 0.264 | 424.5 ± 1.6 | 0.367 |
| GG | 83 (19.1%) | 424.4 ± 1.9 | 0.414 | |
| rs1963645 | ||||
| TT | 288 (65.9%) | 423.6 ± 1.3 | Ref | |
| TC | 138 (31.6%) | 0.244 | 425.7 ± 1.9 | 0.351 |
| CC | 11 (2.5%) | 411 ± 6.7 | 0.065 | |
| rs1964052 | ||||
| CC | 317 (72.2%) | 423.8 ± 1.2 | Ref | |
| CT | 112 (25.5%) | 1 | 424.4 ± 2.1 | 0.792 |
| TT | 10 (2.3%) | 414 ± 7 | 0.171 | |
| rs164146 | ||||
| GG | 312 (71.4%) | 423.8 ± 1.3 | ||
| GC | 113 (25.9%) | 0.647 | 425.2 ± 2.1 | 0.543 |
| CC | 12 (2.7%) | 412.1 ± 6.4 | 0.076 | |
| rs164147 | ||||
| CC | 315 (72.2%) | 423.8 ± 1.2 | Ref | |
| CA | 111 (25.5%) | 1 | 425 ± 2.1 | 0.623 |
| AA | 10 (2.3%) | 415.7 ± 7 | 0.257 | |
| rs164148 | ||||
| GG | 316 (71.7%) | 423.8 ± 1.2 | Ref | |
| GA | 114 (25.9%) | 0.842 | 425.5 ± 2.1 | 0.494 |
| AA | 11 (2.5%) | 408.2 ± 6.7 |
| |
| rs1876986 | ||||
| AA | 111 (25.5%) | 425.2 ± 2.1 | Ref | |
| AG | 231 (53.1%) | 0.182 | 424.2 ± 1.5 | 0.704 |
| GG | 93 (21.4%) | 421.2 ± 2.3 | 0.201 | |
| rs164149 | ||||
| AA | 195 (44.6%) | 424.8 ± 1.6 | Ref | |
| AG | 203 (46.5%) | 0.176 | 423.7 ± 1.5 | 0.608 |
| GG | 39 (8.9%) | 421 ± 3.5 | 0.326 | |
| rs737641 | ||||
| CC | 92 (21.1%) | 421.8 ± 2.3 | Ref | |
| CT | 234 (53.7%) | 0.116 | 424.2 ± 1.5 | 0.383 |
| TT | 110 (25.2%) | 425.1 ± 2.1 | 0.290 | |
| rs164151 | ||||
| TT | 310 (71.8%) | 423.5 ± 1.3 | Ref | |
| TC | 111 (25.7%) | 0.777 | 425.4 ± 2.1 | 0.449 |
| CC | 11 (2.5%) | 412.2 ± 6.7 | 0.096 |
Abbreviations: HW, Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium; Ref, reference.
Associations between NOS1AP rs164148 genotypes and QTc intervals by univariate analysis and multivariate analysis in total, in male, and in female patients.
| SNP | Genotype | Frequency_n (%) | Univariate Analysis | Multivariate Analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs164148 | Mean ± SE | Mean ± SE | ||||
| Total (N = 441) | GG | 316 (71.7%) | 423.8 ± 1.3 | 423.8 ± 1.2 | ||
| GA | 114 (25.9%) | 425.5 ± 2.1 | 0.492 | 425.5 ± 2.1 | 0.494 | |
| AA | 11 (2.5%) | 406.8 ± 6.7 |
| 408.2 ± 6.7 |
| |
| Male ( | GG | 262 (71.8%) | 423 ± 1.4 | 423 ± 1.4 | ||
| GA | 93 (25.5%) | 425 ± 2.3 | 0.457 | 424.8 ± 2.3 | 0.491 | |
| AA | 10 (2.7%) | 404.1 ± 7 |
| 405.9 ± 6.9 |
| |
| Female ( | GG | 54 (71.1%) | 427.9 ± 3 | 427.9 ± 3 | ||
| GA | 21 (27.6%) | 427.8 ± 4.8 | 0.984 | 428.1 ± 4.9 | 0.967 | |
| AA | 1 (1.3%) | 434 ± 22.2 | 0.787 | 431.1 ± 23.5 | 0.891 | |
Figure 2Association of NOS1AP rs164148 AA genotype with QTc intervals and analysis of NOS1AP-methadone interaction in men on methadone. (A) A cut-off adjusted QTc interval of ≤410 ms identified 100% of rs164148 AA carriers compared to none of the rs164148 GG carriers when receiving methadone at 30.6 ± 19.3 mg/day in male patients. (B) The PROC GLM model was used to explore the interaction between the rs164148 NOS1AP variant and methadone dose in relation to the adjusted QTc intervals during maintenance methadone treatment in male participants, the corresponding QTc interval from each genotype carriers taking a projected methadone dose of 40 mg/day, 60 mg/day, and 80 mg/day. There was no significant gene-drug interaction in contributing to the adjusted QTc intervals (P gene*methadone = 0.216) in carriers of the rs164148 AA genotype when compared to that observed for non-carriers.