Donnaya Thanakitpipattana1,2, Suchada Mongkolsamrit2, Artit Khonsanit2, Winanda Himaman3, Janet Jennifer Luangsa-Ard2, Natapol Pornputtapong1. 1. Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Center of Excellence for DNA Barcoding of Thai Medicinal Plants, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand. 2. Plant Microbe Interaction Research Team, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), 113 Thailand Science Park, Phahonyothin Road, Khlong Nueng, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand. 3. Forest Entomology and Microbiology Research Group, Forest and Plant Conservation Research Office, 61 Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, Phahonyothin Road, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Abstract
During surveys of insect pathogenic fungi (IPF) in Thailand, fungi associated with scale insects and plants were found to represent five new species of the genus Ascopolyporus in Cordycipitaceae. Their macroscopic features resembled both Hyperdermium and Ascopolyporus. Morphological comparisons with the type and known Ascopolyporus and Hyperdermium species and phylogenetic evidence from a multigene dataset support the appointment of a new species of Ascopolyporus. Moreover, the data also revealed that the type species of Hyperdermium, H. caulium, is nested within Ascopolyporus, suggesting that Hyperdermium is congeneric with Ascopolyporus. The specimens investigated here differ from other Ascopolyporus species by phenotypic characters including size and color of stromata. Phylogenetic analyses of combined LSU, TEF1, RPB1 and RPB2 sequences strongly support the notion that these strains are distinct from known species of Ascopolyporus, and are proposed as Ascopolyporus albus, A. galloides, A. griseoperitheciatus, A. khaoyaiensis and A. purpuratus. Neohyperdermium gen. nov. is introduced for other species originally assigned to Hyperdermium and Cordyceps occurring on scale insects and host plants as epiphytes, accommodating two new combinations of Hyperdermium pulvinatum and Cordyceps piperis.
During surveys of insect pathogenic fungi (IPF) in Thailand, fungi associated with scale insects and plants were found to represent five new species of the genus Ascopolyporus in Cordycipitaceae. Their macroscopic features resembled both Hyperdermium and Ascopolyporus. Morphological comparisons with the type and known Ascopolyporus and Hyperdermium species and phylogenetic evidence from a multigene dataset support the appointment of a new species of Ascopolyporus. Moreover, the data also revealed that the type species of Hyperdermium, H. caulium, is nested within Ascopolyporus, suggesting that Hyperdermium is congeneric with Ascopolyporus. The specimens investigated here differ from other Ascopolyporus species by phenotypic characters including size and color of stromata. Phylogenetic analyses of combined LSU, TEF1, RPB1 and RPB2 sequences strongly support the notion that these strains are distinct from known species of Ascopolyporus, and are proposed as Ascopolyporus albus, A. galloides, A. griseoperitheciatus, A. khaoyaiensis and A. purpuratus. Neohyperdermium gen. nov. is introduced for other species originally assigned to Hyperdermium and Cordyceps occurring on scale insects and host plants as epiphytes, accommodating two new combinations of Hyperdermium pulvinatum and Cordyceps piperis.
Scale insects are a diverse group of sap-sucking insects in the superfamily Coccoidea of the order Hemiptera, associated with aphids (Aphidoidea) and whiteflies (Aleyrodoidea) [1,2]. These insects cause damage by sucking fluids from leaves, stems and other parts of host plants and excrete honeydew that favors sooty mold growth, which consequently decreases photosynthetic rates. They belong to seven families: Antennulariellaceae, Capnodiaceae, Chaetothyriaceae, Coccodiniaceae, Euantennariaceae, Metacapnodiaceae and Trichomeriaceae [3,4,5]. In addition, many groups of fungi are known to grow on various scale insects by covering the whole surface of the insect body and can be found in the phyla (a) Basidiomycota: Septobasidiales (Septobasidium and Uredinella), (b) Chytridiomycota: Blastocladiales (Myiophagus) and (c) Ascomycota: Myriangiales (Myriangium), Pleosporales (Podonectria), and especially in a large group of entomopathogens in the Hypocreales [6,7,8,9].Hypocrealean fungi associated with armored (Diaspididae) and soft-scale insects (Coccidae) can be found in various genera within five families: (1) Bionectriaceae viz. Clonostachys Corda; (2) Nectriaceae viz. Microcera Desm. and Fusarium Link; (3) Cordycipitaceae viz. Ascopolyporus Möller, Cordyceps Fr. and Hyperdermium J.F. White, R.F. Sullivan, Bills and Hywel-Jones; (4) Ophiocordycipitaceae viz. Ophiocordyceps Petch; and (5) Clavicipitaceae viz. Aschersonia Mont., Conoideocrella D. Johnson, G.H. Sung, Hywel-Jones and Spatafora, Dussiella Pat., Helicocollum Luangsa-ard, Mongkols., Noisrip. and Thanakitp., Hypocrella Sacc., Regiocrella P. Chaverri and K.T. Hodge, Orbiocrella D. Johnson, G.H. Sung, Hywel-Jones and Spatafora and Samuelsia P. Chaverri and K.T. Hodge [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Among them, the most abundant and widespread members are found in Clavicipitaceae and Cordycipitaceae. The macromorphological characters of these genera in nature can be easily distinguished in each family. Scale insect pathogenic genera in Clavicipitaceae, such as Conoideocrella, Hypocrella, Moelleriella and Orbiocrella, possess diverse morphological characters, such as the formation of hard stromata, pulvinate, subglobose or hemispherical and ring-like stromata, as well as the presence of only superficial, cone-shaped perithecia, while in Cordycipitaceae, most have pulvinate, subglobose, hemispherical, soft stromata with crowded perithecia. Two different colors are found the upper and lower surface of stromata in some species of Ascopolyporus and Hyperdermium [11,12,14,16].Ascopolyporus is an epiphytic fungal genus in Cordycipitaceae that produces stromata on the stems of living plants as biotrophs and infects scale insects as necrotrophs comprising only seven species [22]. Ascopolyporus species are commonly found in tropical forests where bamboo is present [23]. The type species of Ascopolyporus, A. polychrous, is a pathogen of bamboo scale insects that produces up to 4 cm large subglobose to polypore-like, bright rusty-red or white to yellow perithecial stromata, which are usually fertile only on the underside of the stroma [12,13,24]. In 2005, a new species of Ascopolyporus, A. philodendrus, was described by Bischoff et al. [14] on bamboo scale insects, and a new description for A. villosus was made. They considered that the morphology of perithecial stromata and the conidial states of Ascopolyporus resemble the scale insect pathogenic genus Hyperdermium, especially its type species, H. caulium [11,14]. Both of these species in the two genera share similar morphological characters, having large stromata, immersed perithecia, filiform ascospores and phialidic conidiogenous cells. The anamorph state is referred to as cylindrocarpon-like phialides, characterized by producing multiseptate conidia, a unique character in the Cordycipitaceae. Moreover, a species of Cordyceps, C. piperis, is also capable of parasitizing scale insects but differ by producing verticillium-like anamorph with aseptate conidia [11,12].During our continuous survey of insect pathogenic fungi (IPF) in national parks and community forests in Thailand, we encountered hyperdermium-like specimens with differences in phenotypic characters including colors and sizes of stromata. These morphologically diverse specimens were preliminarily identified as members of the genus Hyperdermium and Ascopolyporus. The aims of this study are thus (1) to determine the phylogenetic relationship of these two genera and (2) to identify and describe new species of hyperdermium-like fungi on scale insects from Thailand by combining morphological characteristics and reconstructing their phylogeny based on sequence data of LSU, TEF1, RPB1 and RPB2 loci.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Collection and Isolation
The 63 epiphytic isolates in this study were collected from various localities in Thailand since June 1992, representing the first recorded collection from Khao Yai National Park, Nakhon Ratchasima Province. Thereafter, these specimens have been found throughout every region in Thailand, albeit not frequently, including the Ban Hua Thung community forest in Chiang Mai Province; Chiang Dao, Khao Soi Dao and Khlong Nakha wildlife sanctuaries; Kaeng Krachan and Khlong Lan national parks; and the Khao Chong wildlife development and conservation promotion station. Specimens were examined for fungal colonization from the stems and leaves of monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants. The specimens were collected and stored in plastic boxes before returning to the laboratory for isolation. Pure cultures were made from the isolation of the sexual morph following Luangsa-ard et al. [25]. The cultures and the voucher specimens were deposited in Thailand Bioresource Research Center (TBRC) and BIOTEC Bangkok Herbarium (BBH), Thailand, respectively.
2.2. Morphological Study
For obtaining morphological descriptions, all isolates were cultured on oatmeal agar (OA: oatmeal 60 g, agar 12.5 g, in 1 L distilled water, Difco) and potato dextrose agar (PDA: potato 200 g, dextrose 20 g, agar 15 g, in 1 L distilled water) for 14–20 days. Colony morphology was examined for color, size, shape and appearance. Fungal structures of teleomorph and anamorph states were mounted in lactophenol cotton blue solution, and their characters were investigated by light microscopy, as described by Mongkolsamrit et al. [26] and Khonsanit et al. [27]. Sections of the stroma on stems were prepared by using a freezing microtome (Slee Cryostat MEV, Mainz, Germany), and mounted in distilled water and in lactophenol cotton blue solution [28]. The Sixth Royal Horticultural Society (RHS) color chart was used to characterize the colors of fresh specimens and cultures [29]. Twenty to fifty individual length and width measurements were taken, and the amount of variability is provided as average ± standard deviation with absolute minima and maxima in parentheses.
2.3. DNA Extraction, PCR and Sequencing
The mycelial mass of fungi was obtained from cultures grown on PDA for 7 days at 25 °C. A modified CTAB protocol used for DNA extraction using polyvinylpyrrolidone instead of β-mercaptoethanol in CTAB buffer and increasing temperature in the incubation process from 60 °C to 65 °C was previously described by Thanakitpipattana et al. [30]. PCR was used to amplify the nuclear ribosomal large subunits (LSU), the region of the elongation factor 1-α (TEF1), and the largest and second-largest subunits of RNA polymerase II (RPB1 and RPB2). The reaction mix was prepared in 25 μL volumes containing 1× Dream Taq Buffer (with included 20 mM MgCl2), 0.4 M betaine, 200 μM dNTP mix, 0.5 μM of each primer, 1 Unit Dream Taq DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 50 ng of DNA template and Milli-Q water. PCR amplifications of four loci were carried out with the following primers: LROR and LR5 for LSU [31,32], 983F and 2218R for TEF1 [33], CRPB1 and RPB1-Cr for RPB1 [34], and RPB2-5F2 and RPB2-7Cr for RPB2 [35,36]. The PCR conditions were performed as follows: 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at a suitable temperature for 1 min, extension at 72 °C for 1 min and a final extension of 72 °C for 10 min. The annealing temperature of each gene was 50 °C for RPB1 and RPB2, and 55 °C for TEF1 and LSU. PCR products were purified and subsequently sequenced with PCR amplification primers.
2.4. Sequence Alignment and Phylogenetic Analyses
The newly generated sequences from the twelve strains in this study were assembled using BioEdit v. 7.2.5 [37] and then deposited in the GenBank database under the accession numbers of TEF1 (OL322029-OL322040), LSU (OL322041-OL322052), RPB1 (OL322053-OL322059) and RPB2 (OL322060-OL322070) (Table 1). Sequences of each locus were aligned using MUSCLE 3.6 [38] together with other sequences of related taxa from previous studies for phylogenetic analyses (see Table 1), and manually refined to minimize gaps. The concatenated (LSU + TEF1 + RPB1 + RPB2) sequences were analyzed by maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI), both on the CIPRES Science Gateway portal [39]. Maximum likelihood analysis was performed with RAxML-HPC2 on XSEDE v.8.2.12 with default parameters [40] using the GTRCAT substitution model with 1000 rapid bootstrap replicates. The program MrModeltest v.2.2 [41] was used to determine the model of evolution under the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) implemented in PAUP v.4.0a169 [42], which selected SYM + G as the best nucleotide substitution model. The BI analysis was performed using MrBayes on XSEDE v.3.2.7a with default parameters [43]. The Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) searches were run for 5,000,000 generations with sampling every 1000 generations and a burn-in value of 10%. Nodes were considered as strongly supported with bootstrap and posterior probability values greater than 70% and 0.7, respectively.
Table 1
List of species and GenBank accession numbers of sequences used in this study. Bold accession numbers were generated for this study. The symbol “–” denotes no available data.
Species
Strain
GenBank Accession No.
References
LSU
TEF1
RPB1
RPB2
Akanthomyces aculeatus
HUA 186145
MF416520
MF416465
–
–
[44]
Akanthomyces attenuatus
CBS 402.78
AF339565
EF468782
EF468888
EF468935
[45]
Akanthomyces lecanii
CBS 101247
AF339555
DQ522359
DQ522407
DQ522466
[45]
Akanthomyces neoaraneogenus
GZU1032Lea
KX845704
KX845698
KX845700
KX845702
[46]
Akanthomyces sabanense
ANDES-F 1024
KC875225
KC633266
–
KC633249
[47]
Akanthomyces tuberculatus
OSC 111002
DQ518767
DQ522338
DQ522384
DQ522435
[45]
Ascopolyporus albus
BCC48975
OL322048
OL322035
OL322056
OL322065
This study
Ascopolyporus albus
BCC48976
OL322049
OL322036
OL322057
OL322066
This study
Ascopolyporus galloides
BCC25446
OL322042
OL322029
OL322053
OL322060
This study
Ascopolyporus galloides
BCC47981
OL322043
OL322030
OL322054
OL322061
This study
Ascopolyporus galloides
BCC48704
OL322044
OL322031
OL322055
OL322062
This study
Ascopolyporus griseoperitheciatus
BCC22358
OL322050
OL322037
–
OL322067
This study
Ascopolyporus griseoperitheciatus
BCC25788
OL322051
OL322038
OL322058
OL322068
This study
Ascopolyporus khaoyaiensis
BCC43314
OL322052
OL322039
–
OL322069
This study
Ascopolyporus khaoyaiensis
BCC43741
OL322041
OL322040
–
OL322070
This study
Ascopolyporus polychrous
P.C. 546
DQ118737
DQ118745
DQ127236
–
[15]
Ascopolyporus purpuratus
BCC88388
OL322046
OL322033
–
OL322064
This study
Ascopolyporus purpuratus
BCC88389
OL322047
OL322034
–
–
This study
Ascopolyporus purpuratus
BCC88430
OL322045
OL322032
OL322059
OL322063
This study
Ascopolyporus villosus
ARSEF 6355
AY886544
DQ118750
DQ127241
–
[14,15]
Beauveria bassiana
ARSEF 300
–
AY531924
HQ880831
HQ880903
[33,48]
Beauveria kipukae
ARSEF 7032
–
HQ881005
HQ880875
HQ880947
[48]
Beauveria staphylinidicola
ARSEF 5718
EF468836
EF468776
EF468881
–
[45]
Beauveria varroae
ARSEF 2694
–
HQ881004
HQ880874
HQ880946
[48]
Blackwellomyces cardinalis
OSC 93609
AY184962
DQ522325
DQ522370
DQ522422
[49,50]
Blackwellomyces cardinalis
OSC 93610
AY184963
EF469059
EF469088
EF469106
[45,50]
Blackwellomyces pseudomilitaris
BCC 1919
MF416534
MF416478
–
MF416440
[44]
Blackwellomyces pseudomilitaris
BCC 2091
MF416535
MF416479
–
MF416441
[44]
Cordyceps bifusispora
EFCC 5690
EF468806
EF468746
EF468854
EF468909
[45]
Cordyceps lepidopterorum
TBRC 7263
MF140699
MF140819
MF140768
MF140792
[51]
Cordyceps piperis
CBS 116719
AY466442
DQ118749
DQ127240
EU369083
[15,17]
Cordyceps takaomontana
BCC28612
FJ765252
FJ765268
–
–
[52]
Cordyceps tenuipes
ARSEF 5135
JF415980
JF416020
JN049896
JF416000
[53]
Engyodontium aranearum
CBS 309.85
AF339526
DQ522341
DQ522387
DQ522439
[49]
Gibellula leiopus
BCC 16025
MF416548
MF416492
MF416649
–
[44]
Gibellula pulchra
NHJ 10808
EU369035
EU369018
EU369056
EU369076
[17]
Gibellula sp.
NHJ 10788
EU369036
EU369019
EU369058
EU369078
[17]
Gibellula sp.
NHJ 13158
EU369037
EU369020
EU369057
EU369077
[17]
Hevansia arachnophila
NHJ 10469
EU369031
EU369008
EU369047
–
[17]
Hevansia cinerea
NHJ 3510
–
EU369009
EU369048
EU369070
[17]
Hevansia nelumboides
BCC 2093
MF416530
MF416473
–
MF416437
[44]
Hevansia novoguineensis
NHJ 4314
–
EU369012
EU369051
EU369071
[17]
Hyperdermium caulium
AF242354
AF242354
–
–
–
[11]
Hyperdermium pulvinatum
P.C. 602
DQ118738
DQ118746
DQ127237
–
[15]
Lecanicillium antillanum
CBS 350.85
AF339536
DQ522350
DQ522396
DQ522450
[45]
Lecanicillium psalliotae
CBS 363.86
AF339559
EF468784
EF468890
–
[45]
Lecanicillium psalliotae
CBS 532.81
AF339560
EF469067
EF469096
EF469112
[45]
Neotorrubiella chinghridicola
BCC 39684
MK632096
MK632148
MK632071
MK632181
[30]
Neotorrubiella chinghridicola
BCC 80733
MK632097
MK632149
MK632072
MK632176
[30]
Samsoniella aurantia
TBRC 7271
MF140728
MF140846
MF140791
–
[51]
Samsoniella aurantia
TBRC 7273
MF140726
MF140844
–
MF140816
[51]
Samsoniella inthanonensis
TBRC 7915
MF140725
MF140849
MF140790
MF140815
[51]
Samsoniella inthanonensis
TBRC 7916
MF140724
MF140848
MF140789
MF140814
[51]
Outgroup
Flavocillium bifurcatum
YFCC 6101
MN576781
MN576951
MN576841
MN576897
[54]
Lecanicillium sp.
CBS 639.85
KM283801
KM283824
KM283843
KM283865
[54]
3. Results
3.1. Molecular Phylogeny
The combined four-gene dataset of 54 taxa consisted of 3404 bp (LSU 861 bp, TEF1 954 bp, RPB1 730 bp, RPB2 859 bp). Flavocillium bifurcatum and Flavocillium sp. in Cordycipitaceae were used as an outgroups. Phylogenetic tree topology obtained from ML was similar to the BI analysis. Therefore, only the ML tree is shown (Figure 1). Multigene phylogenetic analyses revealed that the sequenced strains comprise five novel species and are nested with the type and other species of Ascopolyporus, A. polychrous and A. villosus, as well as type species of Hyperdermium, H. caulium, within the Ascopolyporus clade, with strong support (81% ML bootstrap (MLBS) and 0.99 BI posterior probability (BIPP)), as shown in Figure 1. The type species H. caulium is clustered within this clade, suggesting that Hyperdermium is congeneric with Ascopolyporus, although with low internal bootstrap support because only LSU sequence data are available (<50 MLBS and <0.5 BIPP, data not shown).
Figure 1
Phylogenetic reconstruction of Ascopolyporus and related genera in the Cordycipitaceae obtained from the combined LSU, TEF1, RPB1 and RPB2 sequence dataset based on maximum likelihood (RAxML) and Bayesian inference. Numbers on the nodes are ML bootstrap and Bayesian posterior probability values above 70% (MLBS) or 0.7 (BIPP). Thickened lines mean support for the two analyses was 100% (MLBS) or 1.0 (BIPP). represents species with pulvinate stromata while represents species with flattened stromata.
Three of our new species are found in the pulvinate subclade showing irregularly subglobose to globose stromata, namely, Ascopolyporus albus, A. galloides and A. griseoperitheciatus, with 93% MLBS and 0.97 BIPP. Another subclade comprises both flattened and pulvinate stromata of two new and known species, including Ascopolyporus khaoyaiensis, A. purpuratus, A. polychrous, A. villosus and H. caulium (Figure 1). The Ascopolyporus clade is sister to the Blackwellomyces clade, which produces similar types of phialides and conidial arrangement as well as acremonium-like or lecanicillium-like anamorphs.The position of Hyperdermium pulvinatum and Cordyceps piperis, on the other hand, is clearly distant from the Ascopolyporus clade, and these two species always clustered together separate from the type species of Hyperdermium, H. caulium. These two species form a basal clade to Akanthomyces, Samsoniella, Beauveria and Cordyceps. Based on their multigene phylogenetic position presented in this study, we propose to transfer these two species to the genus Neohyperdermium.
3.2. Taxonomy
Möller emend. Thanakitpipattana and Luangsa-ard.Stromatal mass exceeding scale insect host. Stroma bulbous (lumpy or tuberous) or ungulate, flattened or pulvinate, fleshy or gall-like, polypore-like, white, yellowish white, purple to orange; sterile surface and fertile underneath the stroma. Perithecia semi-immersed to immersed, ovate to obclavate or cone-shaped. Asci hyaline, filiform. Ascospores hyaline, whole with septation or aseptate. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, solitary, slightly curved. Conidia hyaline, fusiform to subcylindrical, acerose, aseptate or 1–5 septate when mature, in chains or in sticky heads.Typification: Ascopolyporus polychrous.Habit and type host: On dead culms of bamboo, stems or leaf midrib of monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants.Distribution: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Peru, Thailand [23].Mongkolsamrit, Thanakitpipattana and Luangsa-ard sp. nov. Figure 2.
Figure 2
Ascopolyporus albus. (a) Stromata on living stem of bamboo (Bambusae); (b) cross-section through stroma showing perithecia (BBH30734); (c) perithecia; (d,e) asci. (f) ascospores; (g) colony obverse on OA; (h) colony reverse on OA; (i,j) phialide apex with conidial head on OA; (k) conidia on OA; (l) colony obverse on PDA; (m) colony reverse on PDA; (n,o) phialide and conidia on PDA; (p) conidia on PDA. Scale bars: (g,h,l,m) = 10 mm; (a) = 5 mm; (b) = 200 μm; (c) = 100 μm; (d,f,j,n,o) = 20 μm; (e,k,p) = 10 μm.
MycoBank: MB 841855.Etymology: From the Latin “albus”, referring to the white color of the fresh stromata.Typification: Thailand, Chiang Mai Province, Chiang Dao Wildlife Sanctuary, Doi Chiang Dao Wildlife Research Station; 19°23′10.70″ N, 98°50′28.50″ E, on scale insects (Coccidae; Hemiptera), on living stem of bamboo (Bambusae), 17 August 2011, K. Tasanathai (K.T.), P. Srikitikulchai (P.S.), S. Mongkolsamrit (S.M.), A. Khonsanit (A.K.) (holotype BBH30734, ex-holotype culture BCC48975). GenBank: ITS = OL331502, LSU = OL322048, TEF1 = OL322035, RPB1 = OL322056, RPB2 = OL322065.Description: Stromata epibiotic, pulvinate, subglobose, globose, white (NN155C) to pinkish white (N155B), becoming dark brown when old, 3–6 mm wide, 2–3 mm thick. Perithecia semi-immersed, with slightly protruding orifices, obpyriform, 250–320 × 100–120 µm. Asci cylindrical up to 250 µm long and 3–4 µm wide, Asci caps 2–3 × 3–4 μm. Ascospores hyaline, whole, filiform, multiseptate, 95–135 × 1 µm.Culture characteristics: Colonies on OA attaining a diameter of 3.5–4 cm in 14 days, slightly convex to the agar surface, white, reverse moderate orange yellow (164C). Phialides arising from aerial hyphae, solitary, cylindrical, slightly curved, up to 80 µm long, 1–2 µm wide. Conidia hyaline, enteroblastic, fusiform to acerose, early in development aseptate, becoming 1–4 septa, aggregated at the apex of the phialides, (8–)10–23(–28) × (2–)2.5–3 µm. Colonies on PDA attaining a diameter of 3.5–4 cm in 14 days, slightly convex to the agar surface, white, reverse light yellow (162C). Phialides arising from aerial hyphae, solitary, cylindrical, slightly curved, up to 120 µm long, 1–2 µm wide. Conidia hyaline, enteroblastic, fusiform to acerose, early in development aseptate, developing 1–4 septa, aggregated at the apex of the phialides, (8–)10.5–21(–30) × (2–)2.5–3(–3.5) µm.Habitat: On scale insects (Coccidae; Hemiptera), found on living stems of bamboo (Bambusae).Additional specimen examined: Thailand, Chiang Mai Province, Chiang Dao Wildlife Sanctuary, Doi Chiang Dao Wildlife Research Station; 19°23′10.70″ N, 98°50′28.50″ E, on scale insects (Coccidae; Hemiptera), on the living stems, 17 August 2011, K.T., P.S., S.M., A.K. (BBH30734, BCC48976). GenBank: ITS = OL331503, LSU = OL322049, TEF1 = OL322036, RPB1 = OL322057, RPB2 = OL322066.Notes: Ascopolyporus albus significantly differs from other species in Ascopolyporus herein. The difference is in the color of stromata. Ascopolyporus albus produces white to pinkish white stromata (Figure 2), whereas other species produce very pale violet (91D) to yellowish white (158) with strong orange (25A) stromata. Based on Ascopolyporus species from Thailand, the perithecia of A. albus are semi-immersed, similar to those in A. galloides, A. griseoperitheciatus and A. purpuratus. The perithecial shape of A. albus differs from A. galloides, A. griseoperitheciatus and A. purpuratus by having an obpyriform shape, whereas perithecia in A. galloides, A. griseoperitheciatus and A. purpuratus are obclavate, obovoid and ovoid, respectively.(Berk. and M.A. Curtis) Thanakitp. and Luangsa-ard, comb. nov.MycoBank: MB 842779.≡ Corticium caulium Berk. and M.A. Curtis, J. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad. 2: 279. 1854.≡ Hypocrella caulium (Berk. and M.A. Curtis) Pat., Bull. Soc. Mycol. France 30: 346. 1915.≡ Hyperdermium caulium (Berk. and M.A. Curtis) P. Chaverri and K.T. Hodge, 2008.= Hypocrella camerunensis Henn., Engler’s Bot. Jahrb. 23: 540. 1897.= Hypocrella brasiliana (Henn.) Mains, Mycopath. Myc. Appl. 11: 311. 1959.≡ Stigmatea brasiliana Henn., Hedwigia 36: 230. 1897.≡ Hypocrella camerunensis var. brasiliana Henn., Hedwigia 43: 85. 1904.= Hyperdermium bertonii J.F. White, R.F. Sullivan, Bills and Hywel-Jones, Mycologia 92: 910. 2000.≡ Epichloë bertonii Speg., An. Mus. Nac. Hist. Nat. Buenos Aires 31: 416. 1922.Khonsanit, Thanakitpipattana and Luangsa-ard sp. nov.
Figure 3.
Figure 3
Ascopolyporus galloides. (a,b) Stromata on living stem of dicotyledonous plant (BBH48704); (c) cross-section through stroma showing perithecia; (d) perithecia; (e) asci; (f) asci-caps; (g) ascospores; (h) colony obverse on OA; (i) colony reverse on OA; (j–l) phialide apex with conidial head on OA; (m) conidia on OA; (n) colony obverse on PDA; (o) colony reverse on PDA; (p–r) phialide apex with conidial head on PDA; (s) conidia on PDA. Scale bars: (h,i,n,o) = 10 mm; (a) = 5 mm; (b) = 1 mm; (c) = 200 μm; (d,g) = 100 μm; (j,k,l,q,r) = 20 μm; (e,f,m,p,s) = 10 μm.
MycoBank: MB 841853.Etymology: Refers to the character of the stromata, which look similar to plant galls.Typification: Thailand, Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Khao Yai National Park, Mo Singto Nature Trail; 14°26′21.46″ N, 101°22′20.20 ″E, on scale insects (Coccidae; Hemiptera), on the living stems of dicotyledonous plant, 5 July 2011, A.K., K.T., K. Sansatchanon (K.S.), P.S., S.M., W. Noisripoom (W.N.) (holotype BBH30629, ex-holotype culture BCC48704). GenBank: ITS = OL331509, LSU = OL322044, TEF1 = OL322031, RPB1 = OL322055, RPB2 = OL322062.Description: Stromata epibiotic, pulvinate, subglobose, hemispherical, upper surface white (NN155B) to yellowish white (158); lower surface strong orange (N25C), 1–7 mm wide. Perithecia semi-immersed, crowded, obclavate, 170–340 × 60–110 μm. Asci cylindrical, (129–)133–153.5(–175) × (3–)3.5–5(–6) μm. Asci caps 1–2 × 2.5–4 μm. Ascospores hyaline, whole, filiform, aseptate, (131–) 154.5–211.5(–216) × 0.5 μm.Culture characteristics: Colony on OA attaining a diameter of 3.5–4 cm in 20 days, flat, slightly convex to the agar surface, white (158), reverse pale greenish yellow (2D). Phialides arising from aerial hyphae, solitary, cylindrical, slightly curved, 35–161 × 1–2 μm. Conidia hyaline, enteroblastic, fusiform to acerose, early in development aseptate, becoming 1–3 septa, aggregated at the apex of the phialides, (4–)6–22(–34) × (1.5–)2–2.5(–3) µm.Colony on PDA attaining a diameter of 4 cm in 20 days, fluffy in the middle, flat to umbonate, white in the middle, pale orange yellow (23D), light yellow (11B), brilliant yellow (11A), reverse moderate orange (173C) in the middle, strong orange yellow (N163D), light yellow (14D). Phialides arising from aerial hyphae, solitary, cylindrical, slightly curved, 30–294 × 1–2 μm. Conidia hyaline, enteroblastic, fusiform to acerose, cylindrical, early in development aseptate, becoming 1–4 septa, aggregated at the apex of the phialides, (5–)8–16(–27) × (2–)2.5–3.5(–4) µm.Habitat: On scale insects (Coccidae, Hemiptera), found on living stems of dicotyledonous plant.Additional specimens examined: Thailand, Ranong Province, Khlong Nakha Wildlife Sanctuary, Khlong Nakha Nature Trail; 9°27′33″ N, 98°30′16″ E, on scale insects (Coccidae; Hemiptera), on living stems of dicotyledonous plant, 5 October 2004, B. Thongnuch (B.T.), D. Johnson (D.J.), K.T., S.M., W. Chaygate (W.C.) (BBH10163, BCC16408; BBH10176, BCC16419; BBH10177, BCC16420; BBH10178, BCC16421; BBH10179, BCC16422; BBH10180, BCC16423); Nakhon Nayok Province, Khao Yai National Park, Tat Ta Phu Waterfall Nature Trail; 14°26′21.46” N, 101°22′20.20” E, on scale insects (Coccidae; Hemiptera), on living stems of dicotyledonous plant, 24 August 2005, K.T. (BBH14835, BCC18980); Phetchaburi Province, Kaeng Krachan National Park, Ban Krang Camp Nature Trail; 12°54′05″ N, 99°37′48″ E, on scale insects (Coccidae; Hemiptera), on living stems of dicotyledonous plant, 14 November 2005, B.T., K.T., R. Ridkaew (R.R.), W.C. (BBH15034, BCC19720); Ranong Province, Khlong Nakha Wildlife Sanctuary, Khlong Nakha Nature Trail; 9°27′33″ N, 98°30′16″ E, on scale insects (Coccidae; Hemiptera), on living stems of dicotyledonous plant, 10 January 2006, B.T., K.T., L.N. Yen (L.N.Y.), L.T. Huyen (L.T.H.), PS, SM, WC (BBH16500, BCC20115); 12 January 2006, B.T., K.T., L.N.Y., L.T.H., P.S., S.M., W.C. (BBH16554, BCC20123); Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Khao Yai National Park, Bueng Phai Nature Trail; 14°26′21.46″ N, 101°22′20.20″ E, on scale insects (Coccidae; Hemiptera), on living stems of dicotyledonous plant, 5 July 2006, B.T., J. Luangsa-ard (J.J.L.), K.T., P.S., S.M., W.C. (BBH18631, BCC22237; BBH18632, BCC22238); Chanthaburi Province, Khao Soi Dao Wildlife Sanctuary, Withiphrai Nature Trail; 13°06′13″ N, 102°11′39″ E, on scale insects (Coccidae; Hemiptera), on living stems of dicotyledonous plant, 1 May 2007, B.T., K.T., R.R., S.M., W.C. (BBH19873, BCC25446; BCC25447, BCC25448); Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Khao Yai National Park, km. 33 Nature Trail; 14°26′21.46″ N, 101°22′20.20″ E, on scale insects (Coccidae; Hemiptera), on living stems of dicotyledonous plant, 8 August 2007, B.T., P. Puyngain (P.P.), W.C. (BBH22627, BCC26680), Trang Province, Khao Chong Wildlife Development and Conservation Promotion Station, 1.8 km. Nature Trail; 7°32′57″ N, 99°47′11″ E, on scale insects (Coccidae; Hemiptera), on living stems of dicotyledonous plant, 18 September 2007, B.T., K.T. (BBH23089, BCC27812); Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Khao Yai National Park, Mo Singto Nature Trail; 14°26′21.46″ N, 101°22′20.20″ E, on scale insects (Coccidae; Hemiptera), on living stems of dicotyledonous plant, 18 June 2009, K.T., P.S., R.R., S.M., T. Chohmee (T.C.) (BBH30139, BCC36656); 20 July 2009, K.T., P.S., R.R., S.M., T.C. (BBH27634, BCC37668); 23 July 2009, K.T., P.S., R.R., S.M. (BCC37879); Khao Yai National Park, km. 29 Nature Trail; 14°26′21.46″ N, 101°22′20.20″ E, on scale insects (Coccidae; Hemiptera), on living stems of dicotyledonous plant, 2 June 2011, A.K., K.T., K.S., P.S., S.M., W.N. (BBH30577, BCC47981); GenBank: ITS = OL331511, LSU = OL322043, TEF1 = OL322030, RPB1 = OL322054, RPB2 = OL322061; Khao Yai National Park, Mo Singto Nature Trail; 14°26′21.46″ N, 101°22′20.20″ E, on scale insects (Coccidae; Hemiptera), on living stems of dicotyledonous plant, 3 August 2011, A.K., K.T., K.S., P.S., S.M., W.N. (BBH30683, BCC48951).Notes: Based on the macromorphologies of the natural samples, the lower surface of stromata of A. galloides and A. griseoperitheciatus are orange and their perithecial layers are white and pale violet to light purplish gray, respectively. The perithecia in these two species are semi-immersed, but perithecia in A. galloides are obclavate, whereas those of A. griseoperitheciatus are obovoid. The colony color of A. galloides on PDA is pale orange yellow, light yellow and brilliant yellow, whereas A. griseoperitheciatus is white and produces a pale purplish pink pigment diffusing in the medium.Khonsanit, Thanakitpipattana and Luangsa-ard sp. nov. Figure 4.
Figure 4
Ascopolyporus griseoperitheciatus. (a,b) Stromata on living stem of dicotyledonous plants (a BBH18679, b BBH30155); (c,d) perithecia; (e) asci; (f) asci-caps; (g) colony obverse on OA; (h) colony reverse on OA; (i) microsclerotium-like structure on OA; (j) phialide apex with conidial head; (k) conidium germination; (l) phialide and conidia on OA; (m) conidia on OA; (n) colony obverse on PDA; (o) colony reverse on PDA; (p) conidia germination; (q–s) phialide and conidia on PDA; (t) conidia on PDA. Scale bars: (a,g,h,n,o) = 10 mm; (b) = 5 mm; (c) = 100 μm; (d,e,l) = 50 μm; (p,q,r,s) = 20 μm; (i,j,k,m,t) = 10 μm; (f) = 5 μm.
MycoBank: MB 841854.Etymology: From the Latin “griseo”, referring to the gray color of the fresh stromata.Typification: Thailand, Kamphaeng Phet Province, Khlong Lan National Park, Khlong Lan Waterfall; 16°07′50.20″ N, 99°16′36.30″ E, on scale insects (Coccidae; Hemiptera), on the living stems of dicotyledonous plant, 19 June 2006, B.T., J.J.L., K.T., P.S., R.R., S.M., W.C. (holotype BBH18679, ex-holotype culture BCC22358). GenBank: ITS = OL331507, LSU = OL322050, TEF1 = OL322037, RPB1 = RPB2 = OL322067.Description: Stromata epibiotic, irregularly pulvinate or subglobose, upper surface very pale violet (91D) to light purplish gray (N187D); lower surface vivid yellow (14C) to strong orange (25A), 3–7 mm wide. Perithecia semi-immersed, crowded, obovoid, 150–320 × 80–140 μm. Asci cylindrical, (150–)154–179(–193) × 4–5 μm. Asci caps 1.5–2 × 3–3.5 μm. Ascospores hyaline, whole, filiform, aseptate, extending the length of ascus.Culture characteristics: Colony on OA attaining a diameter of 4 cm in 20 days, flat, slightly convex to the agar surface, white with light yellow green (150D), reverse pale orange yellow (23D). Phialides arising from aerial hyphae, solitary, cylindrical or acremonium-like, slightly curved, 50–250 × 1–2 μm. Conidia hyaline, enteroblastic, fusiform to acerose, early in development aseptate, becoming 1–2 septa, aggregated at the apex of the phialides, (6–)7–14(–19) × (1.5–)2–3 µm.Colony on PDA attaining a diameter of 3.5–4 cm in 20 days, compact mycelium, slightly convex to the agar surface, white (158), pale purplish pink (56A) pigment diffusing in medium, reverse strong yellowish pink (31C). Phialides arising from aerial hyphae, solitary, cylindrical or acremonium-like, slightly curved, 43–265 × 1–2 μm. Conidia hyaline, enteroblastic, fusiform to acerose, early in development aseptate, becoming 1–2 septa, aggregated at the apex of the phialides, (4–)6–11(–17) × 2–3.5(–4) µm.Habitat: On scale insects (Coccidae; Hemiptera), found on living stems of dicotyledonous plants.Additional specimens examined: Thailand, Chanthaburi Province, Khao Soi Dao Wildlife Sanctuary, Withiphrai Nature Trail; 13°06′13″ N, 102°11′39″ E, on scale insects (Coccidae; Hemiptera), on living stems of dicotyledonous plant, 1 May 2007, B.T., K.T., R.R., S.M., W.C. (BBH19872, BCC25788); Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Khao Yai National Park, Mo Singto Nature Trail; 14°26′21.46″ N, 101°22′20.20″ E, on scale insects (Coccidae; Hemiptera), on living stems of dicotyledonous plant, 30 June 2010, A.K., K.T., K.S., P.S., R. Somnuk (R.S.), S.M. (BBH30155, BCC43315).Notes: Our molecular phylogenetic study has shown that A. griseoperitheciatus is closely related to A. albus. However, A. griseoperitheciatus significantly differs from A. albus in having a perithecial layer on the upper surface of stromata that is very pale violet to light purplish gray, the lower surface of stromata is vivid yellow to strong orange, while in A. albus, the stromata are only white. Additionally, A. griseoperitheciatus produces a pale purplish pink pigment diffusing in PDA plates, whereas A. albus does not produce any pigment.Henn., Hedwigia 41: 8. 1902.Mongkolsamrit, Thanakitpipattana and Luangsa-ard sp. nov. Figure 5.
Figure 5
Ascopolyporus khaoyaiensis. (a,b) Stromata on living stem of dicotyledonous plants (a BBH30157, b BBH30154); (c) perithecia; (d) asci; (e) asci-caps; (f) ascospores; (g) colony obverse on OA; (h) colony reverse on OA; (i,j) phialide apex with conidial head on OA; (k) conidia on OA; (l) colony obverse on PDA; (m) colony reverse on PDA; (n–p) phialide apex with conidial head on PDA; (q) conidia on PDA. Scale bars: (b,g,h,l,m) = 10 mm; (a) = 5 mm; (c) = 100 μm; (i) = 50 μm; (d,f) = 20 μm; (g,j,k,n,o,p,q) = 10 μm; (e) = 5 μm.
MycoBank: MB 841856.Etymology: Named after Khao Yai National Park, where the type specimen was found.Typification: Thailand, Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Khao Yai National Park, Mo Singto Nature Trail; 14°26′21.46″ N, 101°22′20.20″ E, on scale insects (Coccidae; Hemiptera), on the living stems of dicotyledonous plant, 5 A0ugust 2010, K.T., P.S., S.M., A.K., R.S., K.S. (holotype BBH30157, ex-holotype culture BCC43741). GenBank: ITS = OL331513, LSU = OL322041, TEF1 = OL322040, RPB2 = OL322070.Description: Stromata epibiotic, flattened to convex, cylindrical to irregularly shaped, upper surface very pale violet (91D) to dark purple (59A); lower surface white to pale orange (20A), 3–25 mm wide, 1–3 mm thick. Perithecia semi-immersed, slightly protruding apices, narrow flask shaped, slightly protruding, obclavate, 300–360 × 100–120 µm. Asci cylindrical, up to 215 µm long, 3–4 µm wide, Asci caps 2–4 × 3–4 μm. Ascospores hyaline, whole, filiform, aseptate, 175–200 × 1 µm.Culture characteristics: Colonies on OA attaining a diameter of 3.5 cm in 14 days, cottony, white, reverse moderate brown (165A). Phialides arising from aerial hyphae, solitary, cylindrical or acremonium-like, slightly curved, up to 60 µm long, 1–2 µm wide. Conidia hyaline, enteroblastic, fusiform to acerose, early in development aseptate, mostly becoming 1 septum, occasionally 2–3 septa, aggregated at the apex of the phialides, (5–)8–16(–20) × (1.5–)2–3 µm.Colonies on PDA attaining a diameter of 3–4 cm in 14 days, cottony, white, pale orang in the middle of colony, reverse dark red (59A) in the middle, bright strong purplish red (60D) pigment diffusing in medium. Phialides arising from aerial hyphae, solitary, cylindrical or acremonium-like, up to 50 µm long, 1–2 µm wide. Conidia hyaline, enteroblastic, fusiform to acerose, early in development aseptate, mostly becoming 1 septum, occasionally 2–3 septa, aggregated at the apex of the phialides, (7–)9–16.5(–22) × (1.5–)2–3 µm.Habitat: On scale insects (Coccidae; Hemiptera), found on living stems of dicotyledonous plant.Additional specimen examined: Thailand, Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Khao Yai National Park, Mo Singto Nature Trail; 14°26′21.46″ N, 101°22′20.20″ E, on scale insects (Coccidae; Hemiptera), on living stems of dicotyledonous plant, 30 June 2010, K.T., P.S., S.M., A.K., R.S., K.S. (BBH30154, BCC43314). GenBank: ITS = OL331512, LSU = OL322052, TEF1 = OL322039, RPB2 = OL322069.Notes: The stromatal color of the natural samples of A. khaoyaiensis is similar to the purple stromata of A. purpuratus. However, perithecia in A. khaoyaiensis are immersed and obclavate, whereas perithecia in A. purpuratus are semi-immersed and ovoid. Asci of A. khaoyaiensis are shorter than those of A. purpuratus (up to 215 × 3–4 vs. 200–240 × 4–5 µm). Additionally, A. khaoyaiensis and A. purpuratus produce bright strong purplish red pigment diffusing in PDA plates.(Henn.) Möller, Phycomyc. Ascomyc. Bras.: 301. 1901.J.F. Bisch. (as “philodendrus”), Mycologia 97(3): 711. 2005.Möller, Bot. Mitt. Trop. 9: 300. 1901.Möller, Bot. Mitt. Trop. 9: 301. 1901.Mongkolsamrit, Thanakitpipattana, Himaman and Luangsa-ard sp.
nov. Figure 6.
Figure 6
Ascopolyporus purpuratus. (a,b) Stromata on living midrib of leaves of dicotyledonous plant (BBH44511); (c) cross-section through stroma showing perithecia; (d) ovoid perithecia; (e) asci; (f) asci-caps; (g) ascospores; (h) colony obverse on OA; (i) colony reverse on OA; (j,k) phialide apex with conidial head on OA; (l) conidia on OA; (m) colony obverse on PDA; (n) colony reverse on PDA; (o,p) phialide apex with conidial head on PDA; (q) conidia on PDA. Scale bars: (h,i,m,n) = 10 mm; (a,b,c) = 1 mm; (d,e) = 100 μm; (g,j,o) = 20 μm; (f,k,l,p,q) = 10 μm.
MycoBank: MB 841857.Etymology: Referring to the purple color of the fresh stroma.Typification: Thailand, Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Khao Yai National Park, Pong Chang Chomrom Phoen (Nong Phakchi); 14°27’04.0″ N, 101°22’03.60″ E, on scale insects (Coccidae; Hemiptera), on the living stems and midrib of dicotyledonous leaves, 19 September 2018, J.J.L., K.T., D. Thanakitpipattana (D.T.), B. Sakolrak (B.S.), R.S., S.M., W.N., W. Himaman (W.H.), P.S. (holotype BBH44511, ex-holotype culture BCC88430). GenBank: ITS = OL331506, LSU = OL322045, TEF1 = OL322032, RPB1 = OL322059.Description: Stromata epibiotic, flattened to convex, consisting of dense white mycelial mat, upper surface yellow (18D) to very pale purple-violet (75D), 5–12 mm long, 3–8 mm wide. Perithecia semi-immersed, crowded, ovoid, (300–)335–414(–420) × (100–)110–142(–150) µm. Asci cylindrical, up to 240 × 2–4 µm. Asci caps 2–4 × 3–4 μm. Ascospores hyaline, whole, filiform, aseptate, (100–)131–190(–220) × 1–1.5 µm.Culture characteristics: Colonies on OA attaining a diameter of 3–4 cm in 14 days, flat, white, reverse white. Phialides arising from aerial hyphae, solitary, cylindrical or acremonium-like, slightly curved, up to 40 µm long, 1–2 µm wide. Conidia hyaline, enteroblastic, fusiform to acerose, aseptate, aggregated at the apex of the phialides, (5–)6.5–18(–25) × (1.5–)2–2.5(–3) µm.Colonies on PDA attaining a diameter of 2.5–3.5 cm in 14 days, slightly convex to the agar surface, vivid orange (28B) with white in the middle of colony, reverse strong reddish orange (34C), bright moderate reddish orange (N34D) pigment diffusing in medium. Phialides arising from aerial hyphae, solitary, cylindrical or acremonium-like, slightly curved, up to 55 µm long, 1–2 µm wide. Conidia hyaline, enteroblastic, fusiform to acerose, aseptate, aggregated at the apex of the phialides, (5–)7–13.5(–18) × 1.5–2.5(–3) µm.Habitat: On scale insects (Coccidae; Hemiptera), found on living stem and midrib of leaves of dicotyledonous plants.Additional specimen examined: Thailand, Phetchaburi Province, Kaeng Krachan National Park, Ban Krang Camp Nature Trail; 12°54′05″ N, 99°37′48″ E, on scale insects (Coccidae; Hemiptera), on the midrib of leaves, 14 November 2005, K.T., W.C., R.R., B.T. (BBH 15035, BCC 19721); Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Khao Yai National Park, Mo Singto Nature Trail; 14°26′21.46″ N, 101°22′20.20″ E, on scale insects (Coccidae; Hemiptera), on the twigs of tree, 23 July 2009, K.T., P.S., R.R., S.M. (BBH26373, BCC37880); Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Khao Yai National Park, Bueng Phai Nature Trail; 14°26′21.46″ N, 101°22′20.20″ E, on scale insects (Coccidae; Hemiptera), on the midrib of leaves and twigs of tree, 18 September 2018, J.J.L., K.T., D.T., B.S., R.S., S.M., W.N., W.H., P.S. (BBH44547, BCC88388); GenBank: ITS = OL331505, LSU = OL322046, TEF1 = OL322033, RPB2 = OL322064, (BBH44551, BCC88389); GenBank: ITS = OL331504, LSU = OL322047, TEF1 = OL322034.Notes: Ascopolyporus purpuratus can be found on the midrib of leaves and living stems of dicotyledonous plants. In natural samples, the perithecia are pale yellow and/or very pale purple-violet. Additionally, A. purpuratus produces red pigment diffusing in PDA plates the same as A. griseoperitheciatus and A. khaoyaiensis. However, the mycelia of A. purpuratus are white in the middle of the colony with orange edges, whereas A. griseoperitheciatus produces only white mycelia and A. khaoyaiensis produces white mycelia that turn pale orange in the center of colony.Möller, Bot. Mitt. Trop. 9: 301. 1901.Thanakitpipattana and Luangsa-ard, gen. nov.MycoBank: MB 842780.Etymology: Referring to the phenotypic similarity of the stromatal formation to Hyperdermium.Typification: Neohyperdermium piperis (J.F. Bisch. and J.F. White) Thanakitpipattana and Luangsa-ard.Description: Stroma epibiotic, flattened to pulvinate, white to yellow. Hosts are scale insects (Coccoidea, Hemiptera). Perithecia immersed, obpyriform, cymbiform to cone-shaped. Asci cylindrical, linear with enlarged refractive tip. Asexual morph verticillium-like.Notes: This genus is a phylogenetically separate lineage from other scale insect pathogens in Cordycipitaceae, as shown in Figure 1. Two species are recognized in this genus that produce white to yellow stromata, immersed perithecia and a verticillium-like anamorph.(J.F. Bisch. and J.F. White) Thanakitpipattana and Luangsa-ard, comb. nov.MycoBank MB 842782.≡ Torrubiella piperis J.F. Bisch. and J.F. White, Studies in Mycology 50: 89–94. 2004.≡ Cordyceps piperis (J.F. Bisch. and J.F. White) D. Johnson, G.H. Sung, J.F. Bisch. and Spatafora, Mycol. Res. 113(3): 284. 2009.Description and illustration: See J.F. Bisch. and J.F. White (2004).Typification: Panama, Barro Colorado Island, Lutz Creek, scale insect (Coccoidea, Hemiptera) on Piper carrilloanum (Piperaceae) August 2003, J.F. Bischoff and J.F. White, Jr., New York Botanical Garden (NY), culture ex-type CBS 116719.Habitat: Scale insects.Known distribution: Panama.Note: Neohyperdermium piperis is closely related to N. pulvinatum and can be distinguished from N. pulvinatum in producing part-ascospores, whereas in N. piperis, the ascospores are whole with multiple septations and the conidia are aseptate.(J.F. White et al.) Thanakitpipattana and Luangsa-ard, comb. nov.MycoBank: MB 842783.≡ Hyperdermium pulvinatum J.F. White et al., Mycologia 92(5): 908–918. 2000.Description and illustration: See J.F. White et al. (2000).Typification: Costa Rica, Guanacaste, Parque Nacional Guanacaste, Sector El Hacha, Puesto Los Almendros, on Asteraceae, 6 October 1998, J.F. White, G. Bills and S. Salas, RUTPP, culture ex-type ATCC MYA-69.Habitat: Scale insects.Known distribution: Costa Rica.Note: Neohyperdermium pulvinatum is closely related to N. piperis, which can be distinguished by the type of ascospores and the presence of multiseptate conidia.
4. Discussion
The results of our multigene phylogenetic analyses show that our specimens were closely related to Ascopolyporus polychorus, A. villosus and Hyperdermium caulium (Figure 1). Importantly, the specimens in this study are clearly distinct species in Ascopolyporus because of the differences in the sizes, color, perithecial position and features of the stromata, which also overlap with morphological characters of some species previously treated as belonging to the genera Hyperdermium (H. caulium, H. bertonii, H. pulvinatum) and Cordyceps (C. piperis) in Cordycipitaceae, by producing flattened to pulvinate stromata and producing unique cylindrocarpon-like anamorph with multiseptate conidia [11,12,14,16]. The two genera, Ascopolyporus and Hyperdermium, differ only in the sizes and characters of ascomata [11,13,14]; Hyperdermium stromata are either flattened or pulvinate, whereas in Ascopolyporus sensu Möller, the stromata are subglobose to polypore-like. Based on these results, since the type species of Hyperdermium, H. caulium, is nested within Ascopolyporus, Hyperdermium is synonymized with Ascopolyporus and a new combination is proposed for H. caulium. The generic description of Ascopolyporus is therefore emended to include flattened to pulvinate stromata.Our new species in Ascopolyporus are characterized by possessing flattened and pulvinate stromata, two groups that are supported as separate clades in phylogenetic analyses (Figure 1). The three pulvinate species (Ascopolyporus albus, A. galloides and A. griseoperitheciatus) have smaller stromata than previously described by Möller [24] and Bischoff et al. [14]. The two new species of Ascopolyporus khaoyaiensis and A. purpuratus have flattened stromata, and their sizes are in the same range as A. caulium (Table 2). All new Ascopolyporus species in this study possess semi-immersed perithecia with ostioles slightly protruding on the surface of the fertile cushion, whereas A. polychrous and A. philodendrus have completely immersed perithecia; A. vilosus does not produce perithecia on stromata [14].
Table 2
Morphological comparisons of Ascopolyporus and related species. NA, not applicable.
Name
Host
Stromata (mm)
Perithecia (µm)
Asci (µm)
Ascospores (µm)
Conidiogenous Cell (µm)
Conidia (µm)
References
Ascopolyporus albus
Scale insect,
pulvinate,
semi-immersed,
hyaline, cylindrical,
hyaline, filiform,
solitary,
enteroblastic,
This study
Epiphyte
subglobose to globose
obpyriform,
up to 250 × 3–4
whole, multiseptate,
slightly curved,
fusiform to acerose,
white to pinkish white
250–320 × 100–120
95–135 × 1
cylindrical,
1–4 septate,
3–6
up to 120 × 1–2
8–30 × 2–3.5
A. caulium
Scale insect,
crustose, subcircular
cylindrical,
cylindrical to
filiform,
phialidic,
enteroblastic,
Sullivan et al., 2000
Epiphyte
yellow to orange,
200–250 × 65–80
slightly fusiform,
multiseptate,
sparse layer
cylindrical to fusiform,
5–100
100–160 × 8–9
extending
slightly truncate at end,
to the length
aseptate: 5–7 × 1–1.5
of ascus × 1 wide
1–5 septate: 15–30 × 1.5–3
A. galloides
Scale insect,
pulvinate, hemispherical,
semi-immersed,
hyaline, cylindrical,
hyaline, filiform,
solitary,
enteroblastic,
This study
Epiphyte
upper: white-yellowish white
obclavate,
129–175 × 3–6
whole, aseptate,
slightly curved,
fusiform to acerose,
lower: strong orange
170–340 × 60–110
131–216 × 0.5
cylindrical,
aseptate to 1–4 septate,
1–7
30–294 × 1–2
5–27 × 2–4
A. griseoperitheciatus
Scale insect
pulvinate, irregular pulvinate
semi-immersed,
hyaline, cylindrical,
hyaline, filiform,
solitary,
enteroblastic,
This study
Epiphyte
to subglobose, 3–7
obovoid,
150–193 × 4–5
whole, aseptate,
slightly curved,
fusiform to acerose,
upper: very pale violet to
150–320 × 80–140
extending to the
cylindrical,
aseptate to 1–2 septate,
light purplish gray
length of ascus
acremonium-like,
4–17 × 2–4
lower: vivid yellow to orange
43–265 × 1–2
A. khaoyaiensis
Scale insect,
flattened to convex,
semi-immersed,
hyaline, cylindrical,
hyaline, filiform,
solitary,
enteroblastic,
This study
Epiphyte
cylindrical to irregular shaped,
obclavate,
up to 215 × 3–4
whole, aseptate,
slightly curved,
fusiform to acerose,
very pale violet to dark purple
300–360 × 100–120
175–200 × 1
cylindrical,
aseptate to 1–3 septate,
3–25
acremonium-like,
7–22 × 1.5–3
up to 50 × 1–2
A. philodendrus
Scale insect,
subglobose,
immersed,
cylindrical,
filiform,
simple,
enteroblastic,
White et al.,2003
Epiphyte
upper: sterile, red-purple
obclavate,
90–140 × 3–5
length of ascus
phialidic,
subcylindrical,
lower: fertile, white to tan
200–300 × 40–80
30–60 × 1–3
aseptate to 1–4 septate,
12–25
7–25 × 3–4
A. polychrous
Scale insect,
polypore-like,
underside of stroma,
hyaline,
hyaline, filiform
NA
enteroblastic, oval,
Möller, 1901;
Epiphyte
bright-rusty red or
immersed,
cylindrical,
to spiroid, 300 × 1,
1-multiseptate,
White et al.,2003
white to yellow
narrow obclavate,
500 × 4
disarticulate into
7–12 × 4–6
40
up to 750
part-spores, 6 × 1
A. purpuratus
Scale insect,
flattened to convex,
semi-immersed, ovoid,
hyaline,
hyaline, filiform,
solitary,
enteroblastic,
This study
Epiphyte
yellow to very pale,
300–420 × 100–150
cylindrical,
whole, aseptate,
slightly curved,
fusiform to acerose,
purple-violet,
up to 240 ×
100–220 × 1–
cylindrical,
aseptate,
5–12 × 3–8
2–4
1.5
acremonium-like,
5–18 × 1.5–3
up to 55 × 1–2
A. villosus
Scale insect,
white to pale yellow,
not produced
NA
NA
phialidic
enteroblastic,
White et al.,2003;Bischoff et al.,2005
Epiphyte
12–25
subcylindrical, guttulate,
aseptate to 1–4 septate,
10–22 × 2–5
Neohyperdermium piperis
Scale insect,
pulvinate, subglobose
immersed, obpyriform
cylindrical,
filiform,
upright,
hyaline, subcylindrical,
Bischoff andWhite, 2004
Epiphyte
to cylindrical,
to cymbiform,
120–170 × 3–5
disarticulating into
verticillate,
rarely subglobose,
white to yellow, 3–10 × 3–6
175–290 × 40–80
part-spores, 4–9 × 1–2
150–400
aseptate, 3–5 × 1–2
N. pulvinatum
Scale insect,
pulvinate, white to tan,
cone-shaped,
linear,
filiform,
phialidic, hyaline,
enteroblastic, subcylindrical,
Sullivan et al.,2000
Epiphyte
3–6
150–250 × 100–130
150–240 × 5–7
multiseptate,
1 to several septa,
slightly arcuate,
130–225 × 1
40–100 × 1–3
aseptate: 14–16 × 2.5–3
1–5 septate: 22–30 × 2.5–4
Another species in Hyperdermium found in Cordycipitaceae, H. pulvinatum, did not cluster with type species H. caulium, which was congruent with Sung et al. [45], Kepler et al. [44] and Wang et al. [54], and is grouped together with Cordyceps piperis possessing pulvinate stromata that are white to yellow, producing aseptate, subcylindrical conidia on cultures (Table 2). These two species are proposed as new combinations in a new genus Neohyperdermium, as Neohyperdermium pulvinatum and N. piperis, which were described as epiphytes on scale insect pathogens in Cordycipitaceae.The evolution and ecology of insect pathogenic fungi using insects and plants as the main source of nutrients remain not fully understood. Humber [55] suggested that the interaction between higher fungi and plants range from virulent pathogens to decomposer to mutualistic symbiosis. In Hypocreales, the genera Aschersonia, Ascopolyporus, Conoideocrella, Dussiella, Hyperdermium, Hypocrella, Moelleriella, Regiocrella and Samuelsia also utilize nutrients from the phloem of host plants through scale insects and white flies (Coccidae and Aleyrodidae) to continue their growth on plants [11,13,14,15]. Our new Ascopolyporus species are also found in this position, in which the scale insect attached to host plants was parasitized until it was consumed, but the fungus continues to utilize the nutrients that are being released through the stylet apparatus. The interactions occurred on the underside of fungal stroma, which is where the bridge for the exchange of nutrients between the fungus and plant exists (Figure 7).
Figure 7
Photographs showing the interaction between fungus, plant and scale insect. (a) Fungal stroma on the stem of a dicotyledonous plant. (b) Underside of fungal stroma removed from the stem. (c,d) Underside of fungal stromata with ventage (arrow) from which the scale insect stylet entered the plant host. Scale bars = (a,b,c) = 1 mm; (d) = 0.05 mm.
Hypocrealean fungi are excellent producers of secondary metabolites which can be used to reduce the damage from insect fungi herbivores and phytopathogenic fungi [13,56]. However, no report has been made on the secondary metabolites produced from any of the reported species in Ascopolyporus, which should be a focus of future studies.Residual Species of .The remaining taxon could not be accommodated in the genus Ascopolyporus because its morphological description resembles other genera in Clavicipitaceae by producing paraphyses, which are not found in Ascopolyporus (Cordycipitaceae; Hypocreales), and molecular phylogenetic data are not available.Henn., Hedwigia 48: 6. 1908.Key to1a. Conidia aseptate……………………………………………………………………………………………21b. Conidia aseptate to multiseptate…………………………………………………………………………32a. Conidia oval………………………………………………………………………………………………..A. möllerianus2b. Conidia fusiform to acerose………………………………………………………………………………A. purpuratus3a. Conidia 1–5 septate, cylindrical to fusiform, 5–30 × 1–3 µm………………………………………….A. caulium3b. Conidia 1–4 septate………………………………………………………………………………………..44a. Conidia subcylindrical…………………………………………………………………………………….54b. Conidia fusiform to acerose………………………………………………………………………………65a. Conidia subcylindrical, 7–25 × 3–4 µm………………………………………………………………….A. philodendrous5b. Conidia subcylindrical, guttulate, 10–22 × 2–5 µm……………………………………………………A. villosus6a. Ascospores hyaline, disarticulate into part-spores…………………………………………………….76b. Ascospores hyaline, whole……………………………………………………………………………….87a. Ascospores filiform to spiroid, 6 × 1 µm……………………………………………………………….A. polychrous7b. Ascospores filiform, 8–15 µm……………………………………………………………………………A. polyporoïdes8a. Ascospores multiseptate, 95–135 × 1 µm……………………………………………………………….A. albus8b. Ascospores aseptate……………………………………………………………………………………….99a. Perithecia semi-immersed, obovoid…………………………………………………………………….A. griseoperithciatus9b. Perithecia semi-immersed, obclavate…………………………………………………………………..1010a. Stromata pulvinate, hemispherical, 1–7 mm…………………………………………………………A. galloides10b. Stromata flattened to convex, cylindrical to irregular shaped, 3–25 mm…………………………A. khaoyaiensisKey to1a. Ascospores filiform, multiseptate, whole………………………………………………………………N. pulvinatum1b. Ascospores filiform, disarticulating into part-spores…………………………………………………N. piperis
Authors: Desiree Johnson; Gi-Ho Sung; Nigel L Hywel-Jones; J Jennifer Luangsa-Ard; Joseph F Bischoff; Ryan M Kepler; Joseph W Spatafora Journal: Mycol Res Date: 2008-10-04
Authors: Fredrik Ronquist; Maxim Teslenko; Paul van der Mark; Daniel L Ayres; Aaron Darling; Sebastian Höhna; Bret Larget; Liang Liu; Marc A Suchard; John P Huelsenbeck Journal: Syst Biol Date: 2012-02-22 Impact factor: 15.683