| Literature DB >> 35628433 |
Ah-Young Kwon1,2, Ju-Yeon Jeong3, Hyun Park4, Sohyun Hwang1,2, Gwangil Kim1,2, Haeyoun Kang1,2, Jin-Hyung Heo1,2, Hye Jin Lee1, Tae-Heon Kim1,2, Hee Jung An1,2.
Abstract
Alteration in expression of miRNAs can cause various malignant changes and the metastatic process. Our aim was to identify the miRNAs involved in cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) and metastasis, and to test their utility as indicators of metastasis and survival. Using microarray technology, we performed miRNA expression profiling on primary cervical SqCC tissue (n = 6) compared with normal control (NC) tissue and compared SqCC that had (SqC-M; n = 3) and had not (SqC-NM; n = 3) metastasized. Four miRNAs were selected for validation by qRT-PCR on 29 SqC-NM and 27 SqC-M samples, and nine metastatic lesions (ML-SqC), from a total of 56 patients. Correlation of miRNA expression and clinicopathological parameters was analyzed to evaluate the clinical impact of candidate miRNAs. We found 40 miRNAs differentially altered in cervical SqCC tissue: 21 miRNAs were upregulated and 19 were downregulated (≥2-fold, p < 0.05). Eight were differentially altered in SqC-M compared with SqC-NM samples: four were upregulated (miR-494, miR-92a-3p, miR-205-5p, and miR-221-3p), and four were downregulated (miR-574-3p, miR-4769-3p, miR-1281, and miR-1825) (≥1.5-fold, p < 0.05). MiR-22-3p might be a metastamiR, which was gradually further downregulated in SqC-NM > SqC-M > ML-SqC. Downregulation of miR-30e-5p significantly correlated with high stage, lymph node metastasis, and low survival rate, suggesting an independent poor prognostic factor.Entities:
Keywords: metastasis; miR-22-3p; miR-30e-5p; miRNA; squamous cell carcinoma; uterine cervix
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35628433 PMCID: PMC9144648 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23105623
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
MiRNAs significantly upregulated (A) or downregulated (B) by more than 2-fold in cervical squamous cell carcinoma compared with normal epithelium.
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| hsa-miR-134 | 2.019 | 0.023 | hsa-miR-210 | −7.229 | <0.001 |
| hsa-miR-1185-2-3p | 2.066 | 0.017 | hsa-miR-142-3p | −5.740 | 0.002 |
| hsa-miR-4532 | 2.093 | 0.027 | hsa-miR-1260a | −5.345 | 0.004 |
| hsa-miR-652-5p | 2.142 | 0.024 | hsa-miR-429 | −5.062 | 0.025 |
| hsa-miR-155-5p | 2.311 | 0.002 | hsa-miR-15a-5p | −4.607 | 0.004 |
| hsa-miR-6717-5p | 2.478 | 0.011 | hsa-miR-19a-3p | −4.577 | 0.005 |
| hsa-miR-6131 | 2.583 | 0.006 | hsa-miR-141-3p | −3.743 | 0.011 |
| hsa-miR-1185-1-3p | 2.804 | 0.003 | hsa-miR-30e-5p | −3.593 | 0.015 |
| hsa-miR-6126 | 2.833 | 0.003 | hsa-miR-16-5p | −3.470 | 0.043 |
| hsa-miR-4734 | 2.997 | <0.001 | hsa-miR-200b-3p | −3.142 | 0.002 |
| hsa-miR-3198 | 3.085 | 0.005 | hsa-miR-103a-3p | −3.044 | 0.004 |
| hsa-miR-4713-3p | 3.125 | 0.011 | hsa-miR-107 | −2.998 | 0.005 |
| hsa-miR-5581-5p | 3.189 | 0.013 | hsa-miR-15b-5p | −2.899 | 0.015 |
| hsa-miR-874 | 3.220 | 0.004 | hsa-miR-22-3p | −2.618 | 0.003 |
| hsa-miR-6132 | 3.267 | 0.027 | hsa-miR-106b-5p | −2.426 | 0.008 |
| hsa-miR-1233-1-5p | 4.516 | <0.001 | hsa-miR-34a-5p | −2.290 | 0.003 |
| hsa-miR-4485 | 4.679 | 0.032 | hsa-miR-342-3p | −2.226 | <0.001 |
| hsa-miR-4695-5p | 5.950 | 0.017 | hsa-miR-93-5p | −2.123 | 0.020 |
| hsa-miR-4497 | 6.501 | 0.009 | hsa-miR-25-3p | −2.088 | 0.017 |
| hsa-miR-4430 | 6.522 | 0.042 | |||
| hsa-miR-4653-3p | 16.451 | 0.022 | |||
Figure 1(A) Hierarchical clustering of the 40 miRNAs differentially regulated between normal epithelium (n = 2) and cervical squamous cell carcinoma (n = 6). (B) KEGG pathway annotation analysis of target genes of the significantly dysregulated 40 miRNAs in 6 cases of cervical SqCC compared with NC, and (C) KEGG pathway annotation analysis of target genes of the significantly dysregulated 8 miRNAs in 3 cases of SqC-M compared with SqC-NM (p < 0.05). The enrichment score of each pathway is expressed as ─log (p-value). (D) Hierarchical clustering of the four selected miRNAs. NC, normal squamous epithelium; SqC-NM, squamous cell carcinoma without metastasis; SqC-M, squamous cell carcinoma with metastasis. The color indicates the signal value, from red (upregulation) to green (downregulation).
The relative expression level of the four miRNAs in cervical squamous cell carcinoma compared with normal squamous epithelium, and in each group of cervical squamous cell carcinoma without metastasis, with metastasis, and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma, by qRT-PCR.
| miRNA | Cervical SqC | Cervical SqC without Metastasis | Cervical SqC with Metastasis | Metastatic SqC from Cervix | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| miR-22-3p | 1.079 ± 1.191 | 0.228 | 1.609 ± 1.415 | 0.819 ± 0.881 | 0.266 ± 0.181 |
|
| miR-30e-5p | 0.857 ± 0.842 |
| 0.891 ± 0.672 | 0.651 ± 0.600 | 1.370 ± 1.577 | 0.054 |
| miR-429 | 0.696 ± 0.839 |
| 0.634 ± 0.752 | 0.693 ± 0.780 | 0.900 ± 1.270 | 0.744 |
| miR-134 | 1.264 ± 1.319 | 0.429 | 1.359 ± 1.651 | 1.277 ± 0.902 | 0.930 ± 0.782 | 0.407 |
SqC, squamous cell carcinoma (*, p < 0.05).
Figure 2Box and whisker plots of miR-22-3p, miR-30e-5p, miR-429, and miR-134 expression levels in primary cervical SqCC without metastasis (SqC-NM; n = 29), primary cervical SqCC with metastasis (SqC-M; n = 27), and metastatic lesions from cervical SqCC (SqC-ML; n = 9) relative to the level of expression in normal squamous epithelium, by qRT-PCR. MiR-22-3p shows a tendency for downregulation in SqC-NM to SqC-M to SqC-ML (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). MiR-30e-5p shows significant downregulation from SqC-NM to SqC-M (p = 0.020). MiRNA-134 and miRNA-429 showed no significant differences in expression levels between the different types of tissue.
Correlation between clinicopathologic factors and miRNA expression.
| miR-420 § | miR-22-3p § | miR-30e-5p § | miR-134 § | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Down-Regulation | Down-Regulation | Down-Regulation | Up-Regulation | |||||
|
| ||||||||
| <60 | 9/49 (18.4%) | 0.583 | 13/49 (26.5%) | 0.666 | 13/49 (26.5%) | 0.182 | 36/49 (73.5%) | 0.182 |
| ≥60 | 0/7 (0.0%) | 1/7 (14.3%) | 0/7 (0.0%) | 3/7 (42.9%) | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| I | 4/27 (14.8%) | 1.000 | 5/27 (18.5%) | 0.280 | 3/27 (11.1%) |
| 20/27 (74.1%) | 0.487 |
| II, III and IV | 5/29 (17.2%) | 9/29 (31.0%) | 10/29 (34.5%) | 19/29 (65.5%) | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| absent | 4/31 (12.9%) | 0.493 | 4/31 (12.9%) |
| 4/31 (12.9%) |
| 24/31 (77.4%) | 0.159 |
| present | 5/25 (20.0%) | 10/25 (40.0%) | 9/25 (36.0%) | 15/25 (60.0%) | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| absent | 1/14 (7.1%) | 0.424 | 1/14 (7.1%) | 0.151 | 0/14 (0%) |
| 1/14 (7.1%) |
|
| present | 8/42 (19.0%) | 13/42 (31.0%) | 13/42 (31.0%) | 16/42 (38.1%) | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| absent | 9/50 (18.0%) | 0.575 | 13/50 (26.0%) | 1.000 | 12/50 (24.0%) | 1.000 | 36/50 (72.0%) | 0.354 |
| present | 0/6 (0.0%) | 1/6 (16.7%) | 1/6 (16.7%) | 3/6 (50.0%) | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| absent | 6/42 (14.3%) | 0.676 | 9/42 (21.4%) | 0.304 | 8/42 (19.0%) | 0.274 | 9/42 (21.4%) |
|
| present | 3/14 (21.4%) | 5/14 (35.7%) | 5/14 (35.7%) | 8/14 (57.1%) | ||||
§ The cut-off values are as follows: miR-429, 0.2-fold; miR-22-3p, 0.5-fold; miR-30e-5p, 0.4-fold; miR-134, 1.5-fold. (*, p < 0.05).
The correlation between HPV16- and HPV16- or 18-infection and miR-22-3p expression.
|
|
| |
| miR-22-3p up-regulation § | 11/12 (91.7%) |
|
| no up-regulation | 24/44 (54.5%) | |
|
|
| |
| miR-22-3p up-regulation § | 12/12 (100.0%) |
|
| no up-regulation | 25/44 (56.8%) |
§ The cut-off value of up-regulation of miR-22-3p is 1.8-fold. (*, p < 0.05).
Figure 3Kaplan–Meier survival curves according to miR-30e-5p (A) and miR-429 (B) expression in 56 cases of cervical SqCC. Downregulation of miR-30e-5p (<0.4-fold relative to the normal epithelium (NC) level) and miR-429 (<0.2-fold relative to the NC level) each correlates with shorter overall survival with statistical significance (log rank = 0.047 and 0.008, respectively).
Multivariate Cox analysis of miR-30e-5p in cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
| Case (n = 56) | Death | Overall Survival | Hazard Ratio | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| <60 | 49 | 8 | 39.2 ± 26.1 |
|
|
| ≥60 | 7 | 2 | 35.7 ± 18.0 | |||
|
| I | 27 | 3 | 46.6 ± 30.7 | 0.16 | 0.235 |
| II/III/IV | 29 | 7 | 1.6 ± 15.9 | |||
|
| absent | 31 | 1 | 39.7 ± 25.9 | 0.05 | 0.219 |
| present | 25 | 9 | 37.5 ± 24.7 | |||
|
| absent | 14 | 0 | 38.9 ± 27.3 | 7.11 × 104 | 0.94 |
| present | 42 | 10 | 38.7 ± 24.8 | |||
|
| absent | 50 | 6 | 39.8 ± 26.0 |
|
|
| present | 6 | 4 | 30.4 ± 15.1 | |||
|
| absent | 42 | 0 | 42.7 ± 27.1 | 1.73 × 107 | 0.865 |
| present | 14 | 10 | 26.8 ± 12.3 | |||
|
| up-regulation | 43 | 6 | 42.0 ± 26.7 |
|
|
| down-regulation | 13 | 4 | 28.1 ± 15.7 | |||
§ The cut-off value of down-regulation of miR-30e-5p is 0.4-fold (*, p < 0.05).