| Literature DB >> 35628395 |
Małgorzata Smoliło-Utrata1,2, Karolina A Tarach2, Katarzyna Samson1, Mariusz Gackowski1, Ewa Madej1, Józef Korecki1, Grzegorz Mordarski1, Michał Śliwa1, Sebastian Jarczewski2, Jerzy Podobiński1, Piotr Kuśtrowski2, Jerzy Datka1, Dorota Rutkowska-Zbik1, Kinga Góra-Marek2.
Abstract
The commercially available zeolite HY and its desilicated analogue were subjected to a classical wet impregnation procedure with NH4VO3 to produce catalysts differentiated in acidic and redox properties. Various spectroscopic techniques (in situ probe molecules adsorption and time-resolved propane transformation FT-IR studies, XAS, 51V MAS NMR, and 2D COS UV-vis) were employed to study speciation, local coordination, and reducibility of the vanadium species introduced into the hierarchical faujasite zeolite. The acid-based redox properties of V centres were linked to catalytic activity in the oxidative dehydrogenation of propane. The modification of zeolite via caustic treatment is an effective method of adjusting its basicity-a parameter that plays an important role in the ODH process. The developed mesopore surface ensured the attachment of vanadium species to silanol groups and formation of isolated (SiO)2(HO)V=O and (SiO)3V=O sites or polymeric, highly dispersed forms located in the zeolite micropores. The higher basicity of HYdeSi, due to the presence of the Al-rich shell, aided the activation of the C-H bond leading to a higher selectivity to propene. Its polymerisation and coke formation were inhibited by the lower acid strength of the protonic sites in desilicated zeolite. The Al-rich shell was also beneficial for anchoring V species and thus their reducibility. The operando UV-vis experiments revealed higher reactivity of the bridging oxygens V-O-V over the oxo-group V=O. The (SiO)3V=O species were found to be ineffective in propane oxidation when temperature does not exceed 400 °C.Entities:
Keywords: 2D COS UV-vis; 51V MAS NMR; XAS; hierarchical zeolites; in situ IR; in situ UV-vis; oxidative dehydrogenation; vanadium
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35628395 PMCID: PMC9142926 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23105584
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1The XRD patterns (A), N2 physisorption isotherms with pore size distribution (inset) (B), and SEM pictures of V- and H-zeolites (C).
Chemical composition and textural properties derived from N2 physisorption. Acidity characteristics is derived from Py and CO adsorption FT-IR studies.
| Material | Si/Al a | SBET b | Smicro c | Smeso e | Vmicro c | Vmeso d | BAS f | LAS f | LASV | LASV/m2 | LASV/Vtotal | BAS Py450/Py170 g |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| m2·g−1 | m2·g−1 | m2·g−1 | cm3·g−1 | cm3·g−1 | µmol·g−1 | µmol·g−1 | µmol·g−1 | µmol g−1·m−2 | µmol cm–3 | [-] | ||
| HY | 31 | 883 | 724 | 158 | 0.30 | 0.22 | 208 | 95 | - | - | - | 0.31 |
| HYdeSi | 18 | 688 | 265 | 423 | 0.12 | 0.53 | 170 | 180 | - | - | - | 0.20 |
| V-HY | 31 | 775 | 645 | 130 | 0.23 | 0.28 | 145 | 221 | 126 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.15 |
| V-HYdeSi | 18 | 319 | 190 | 129 | 0.05 | 0.35 | 80 | 285 | 105 | 0.30 | 0.12 | 0.08 |
a Concentration of Al obtained from chemical analysis (ICP). b Calculated via BET method with the recommendations of Rouquerol et al. [5]. c Calculated via the t-plot method. d Volume of primary mesopores (Vp) and total pore volume (Vt). e Calculated as the difference between SBET and Smicro. f, g Data derived from Py adsorption IR studies: f the concentration of Brønsted (BAS) and Lewis (LAS) acid sites, g the acid strength of Brønsted acid sites (Py450/Py170).
Figure 2The FT-IR spectra of the V zeolites and their H counterparts: in the region of O-H stretching vibrations (A), upon the sorption of carbon monoxide (B) and pyridine (C).
Figure 3Different forms of vanadium species.
Figure 4Partial fluorescence yield XAS spectra of V L3,2 and O K edge regions for vanadium supported on zeolites studied (A). 51V MAS NMR spectra (B). *—denotes spinning side bands. H2-TPR profiles (C).
Figure 5The DR UV-vis spectra of V-HY (A,C) and V-HYdeSi (B,D) collected during the thermal pretreatment in synthetic air flow (A,B) upon contact with propane at 400 °C (C,D). The 2D COS UV-vis maps as inserts.
Figure 6In situ FT-IR spectra collected during propane ODH process over V-HY (A) and V-HYdeSi (B) presented in 2400–2050 cm−1 (CO and CO2) and 1700–1300 cm−1 (surface adsorbed species) spectral ranges: gaseous propane at RT (a), propane on the catalyst at RT (b), propane and O2 (c) at RT, (d) at 200 °C, (e) at 350 °C, (f) upon reaction at 350 °C and cooled down to RT, (g) upon desorption at RT, and (h) the spectrum of gaseous species formed during process.
Figure 7Conversion of propane (A), selectivity to propene (B) and propane ODH products distribution determined for the H- and V-catalysts at various temperatures (contact time 0.33 s) (C) [35].