| Literature DB >> 35627902 |
Mateusz Grajek1, Karolina Krupa-Kotara2, Joanna Kobza1, Antoniya Yanakieva3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Residents of nursing homes (NHs) are one of the most vulnerable social groups to SARS-CoV-2 infection. It seems obvious that all preventive methods, including nutrition, should be a priority for these homes.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; elderly people; nursing homes; nutrition
Year: 2022 PMID: 35627902 PMCID: PMC9141617 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10050765
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Healthcare (Basel) ISSN: 2227-9032
Figure 1Publication search algorithm.
Nutrition standards used in the study.
| Component | Limit of Standard [ | |
|---|---|---|
| Female | Male | |
|
| 1750.0 | 1900.0 |
|
| 52.0 | 52.0 |
|
| 59.0 | 63.0 |
|
| 45.0–65.0 | 45.0–65.0 |
|
| 60.0 | 75.0 |
|
| 0.9 | 1.1 |
|
| 0.9 | 0.9 |
|
| 11.0 | 12.0 |
|
| 1.3 | 1.4 |
|
| 320.0 | 320.0 |
|
| 50.0 | 63.0 |
|
| 15.0 | 15.0 |
|
| 7.0 | 9.0 |
|
| 115.0 | 115.0 |
|
| 1300.0 | 1300.0 |
|
| 3800.0 | 3800.0 |
|
| 1000.0 | 1000.0 |
|
| 580.0 | 580.0 |
|
| 265.0 | 350.0 |
|
| 6.0 | 6.0 |
|
| 7.0 | 9.0 |
|
| 0.3 | 0.3 |
|
| 95.0 | 95.0 |
Energy and nutrition value of assessed decade menus and standards implementation.
| Assessed Year | Statistics | Standards Implementation (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Value | Maximum Value | Average | Median | Mode | Females | Males | ||
|
|
| 1531.50 | 2004.01 | 1652.58 | 1543.04 |
|
| |
|
| 1720.23 | 2123.50 | 1752.52 | 1733.08 |
|
| ||
|
| 1620.31 | 2031.11 | 1652.52 | 1543.43 |
|
| ||
|
| 1731.01 | 2043.00 | 1732.43 | 1721.10 |
|
| ||
|
| 1619.45 | 2094.00 | 1752.55 | 1733.00 |
|
| ||
|
|
| 30.34 | 64.07 | 51.00 | 52.76 |
| ||
|
| 29.04 | 62.00 | 52.02 | 51.78 |
| |||
|
| 31.09 | 64.01 | 50.11 | 50.34 |
| |||
|
| 32.05 | 63.05 | 51.00 | 50.88 |
| |||
|
| 31.03 | 63.00 | 50.10 | 51.62 |
| |||
|
|
| 75.23 | 122.03 | 110.43 | 111.55 |
|
| |
|
| 75.28 | 123.00 | 111.00 | 108.00 |
|
| ||
|
| 74.03 | 120.30 | 109.10 | 110.44 |
|
| ||
|
| 71.34 | 125.54 | 110.03 | 111.06 |
|
| ||
|
| 76.11 | 123.83 | 112.70 | 113.00 |
|
| ||
|
|
| 111.00 | 221.01 | 150.20 | 141.00 |
| ||
|
| 112.00 | 222.32 | 155.80 | 140.46 |
| |||
|
| 110.36 | 225.21 | 148.23 | 141.14 |
| |||
|
| 111.01 | 225.07 | 147.20 | 138.00 |
| |||
|
| 113.00 | 220.01 | 149.00 | 142.00 |
| |||
Figure 2The content of selected nutrients in decade menus.
The content of selected vitamins and minerals in assessed menus (daily intake).
| Vitamins/ | Assessed Year | Standards Implementation (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Average | Females | Males | |
|
| 112.20 | 114.23 | 115.40 | 116.01 |
|
| |
|
| 3.02 | 4.30 | 5.45 | 1.01 |
|
| |
|
| 1.00 | 5.00 | 2.20 | 3.01 |
|
| |
|
| 17.45 | 18.00 | 20.00 | 22.00 |
|
| |
|
| 1.00 | 3.20 | 2.00 | 6.00 |
|
| |
|
| 339.10 | 342.34 | 341.00 | 348.00 |
|
| |
|
| 150.23 | 158.00 | 151.89 | 151.00 |
|
| |
|
| 8.02 | 10.04 | 9.00 | 9.60 |
|
| |
|
| 16.01 | 18.02 | 20.08 | 22.59 |
|
| |
|
| 92.34 | 100.30 | 96.42 | 91.02 |
|
| |
|
| 2258.02 | 2261.89 | 2261.09 | 2266.02 |
|
| |
|
| 1986.45 | 1986.30 | 1986.05 | 1986.00 |
|
| |
|
| 819.22 | 820.00 | 823.00 | 830.00 |
|
| |
|
| 1805.00 | 1802.00 | 1815.33 | 1810.00 |
|
| |
|
| 382.45 | 388.60 | 390.00 | 386.70 |
|
| |
|
| 15.00 | 18.33 | 12.30 | 11.00 |
|
| |
|
| 14.01 | 12.00 | 18.05 | 15.80 |
|
| |
|
| 0.40 | 0.48 | 0.58 | 0.52 |
|
| |
|
| 41.02 | 50.00 | 43.22 | 56.67 |
|
| |
ORAC values for analyzed menus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1575.03 | 5015.45 | 3079.03 | 3079.55 | ||
|
| 1685.20 | 5125.34 | 3189.34 | 3189.65 | ||
|
| 1884.33 | 5324.21 | 3388.23 | 3388.11 | ||
|
| 1687.01 | 5127.11 | 3191.11 | 3191.12 | ||
|
| 1452.08 | 4892.23 | 2956.71 | 2956.34 |
Figure 3Qualitative evaluation of menus.