| Literature DB >> 35627366 |
Wenyan Yan1, Eunjin Kim2, Soyeon Jeong3, Yeonghye Yoon4.
Abstract
In recent years, the importance of professionalism of convention workers has been rapidly emerging. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to establish a strategy for strengthening the professionalism of convention workers. For this, the study investigates if there are any differences in job satisfaction and job performance based on the segmented groups of professionalism perception of convention workers. The results of factor analysis showed six underlying dimensions of professionalism perception of convention workers. Cluster analysis showed that there were different segmented groups of professionalism perception: high level (cluster 1), low level (cluster 2), moderate level (cluster 3). Lastly, MANOVA showed that there were differences in job satisfaction and job performance among the segmented groups. More theoretical and practical implications are discussed in the conclusion.Entities:
Keywords: cluster analysis; convention workers; job performance; job satisfaction; professionalism perception
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35627366 PMCID: PMC9140368 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19105829
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Profile of respondents.
| Item | Frequency | Ratio | Item | Frequency | Ratio | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Male | 131 | 54.1 | Age | 20s | 98 | 40.5 |
| Female | 111 | 45.9 | 30s | 96 | 39.7 | ||
| Monthly income | less than 2 million | 80 | 33.1 | 40s | 38 | 15.7 | |
| 2 million | 91 | 37.6 | Over 50 | 10 | 4.1 | ||
| 3 million | 42 | 17.4 | Position | Employee | 57 | 23.6 | |
| 4 million | 18 | 7.4 | Chief | 33 | 13.6 | ||
| Over 5 million | 11 | 4.5 | Deputy | 63 | 26 | ||
| Working years | less than 2 years | 47 | 19.4 | Manager | 56 | 23.1 | |
| 2~less than 4 years | 63 | 26.0 | Director or higher | 33 | 13.6 | ||
| 4~less than 6 years | 52 | 21.5 | Education | high school diploma or under | 16 | 6.6 | |
| 6~less than 8 years | 33 | 13.6 | college graduation | 28 | 11.6 | ||
| 8~less than 10 years | 22 | 9.1 | University graduation | 156 | 64.5 | ||
| Over 10 years | 25 | 10.3 | Postgraduate or above | 42 | 17.4 | ||
Results of factor analysis for Professionalism perception variables.
| Factor | Mean | Factor Loading | Eigen Values | Explained Variance | Cronbach’s α |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor 1: Vocational expertise | 6.029 | 30.147 | 0.830 | ||
| Participation in outside activities is needed to improve professionalism | 4.17 | 0.808 | |||
| Qualification standards for job related certificates have to be strengthened to improve professionalism | 4.14 | 0.798 | |||
| Dedicated organization is needed to improve welfare and professionalism | 4.24 | 0.770 | |||
| Academic degree related to the job is required | 3.96 | 0.726 | |||
| Factor 2: Work autonomy | 2.421 | 12.105 | 0.894 | ||
| The importance of tasks of convention workers is acknowledged | 4.05 | 0.872 | |||
| Convention management is left to the convention workers | 4.07 | 0.866 | |||
| Convention workers take responsibility for incidents that have occurred during the convention | 4.02 | 0.712 | |||
| Factor 3: Social contribution | 1.764 | 8.819 | 0.802 | ||
| The job contributes to the cultural development of the local society | 4.32 | 0.779 | |||
| The job contributes to the economic development of the local society | 4.31 | 0.748 | |||
| The job contributes to development of future society | 4.20 | 0.712 | |||
| The job requires social contribution over economic gains | 3.98 | 0.630 | |||
| Factor 4: Social status | 1.502 | 7.511 | 0.800 | ||
| Working condition is fine | 2.54 | 0.901 | |||
| Have better incomes compared to other occupations of similar academic background | 2.60 | 0.823 | |||
| Job security of the industry is stable | 2.59 | 0.794 | |||
| Factor 5: Job ethics | 1.201 | 6.004 | 0.705 | ||
| Subcontractors are respected, and their differences are accepted | 4.26 | 0.841 | |||
| There are beliefs in work that mediate and manage affairs like convention hosting, organizing, operating, etc. | 4.26 | 0.769 | |||
| Moral obligations are well followed | 4.21 | 0.580 | |||
| Factor 6: Work functionality | 1.117 | 5.584 | 0.625 | ||
| Voluntary participation in various educations is required | 4.20 | 0.797 | |||
| High-level of work performance is required | 4.18 | 0.703 | |||
| Continuous research about method of mediation and management of works such as international conference hosting, organizing, operating is needed. | 4.24 | 0.659 |
Note: KMO measure of sampling adequacy = 0.798, Chi-Square = 2592.661, df = 190, p < 0.001.
Results of factor analysis for job performance variables.
| Factor | Mean | Factor Loading | Eigen Values | Explained Variance | Cronbach’s α |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor 1: salary satisfaction | |||||
| Satisfied with the decision procedure of wage, bonus, and allowance | 2.70 | 0.895 | 3.443 | 34.430 | 0.890 |
| The effort matches the wage | 2.71 | 0.875 | |||
| Wage is enough for living | 2.78 | 0.866 | |||
| Satisfied with welfare | 2.81 | 0.832 | |||
| Factor 2: work contents satisfaction | |||||
| The job is valuable | 4.33 | 0.862 | 2.757 | 27.566 | 0.831 |
| The job provokes constant interest | 4.28 | 0.829 | |||
| Feel sense of accomplishment from the job | 4.43 | 0.821 | |||
| Factor 3: relationship with coworkers’ satisfaction | |||||
| Coworkers are helpful | 4.16 | 0.808 | 1.144 | 11.445 | 0.752 |
| My boss evaluates me fairly | 3.77 | 0.792 | |||
| Satisfied with relation with coworkers | 4.04 | 0.778 |
Note: KMO measure of sampling adequacy = 0.806, Chi-Square = 1114.210, df = 45, p < 0.001; Bartlett’s test of sphericity (p < 0.001).
Results of Cluster analysis based on Professionalism perception.
| Vocational Expertise | Work Autonomy | Social | Social | Job Ethics | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K-means cluster analysis | cluster 1 ( | 4.33 | 4.52 | 4.48 | 3.11 | 4.34 | 4.24 |
| cluster 2 ( | 3.59 | 2.84 | 3.52 | 2.40 | 3.88 | 3.98 | |
| cluster 3 ( | 4.28 | 4.35 | 4.35 | 1.87 | 4.41 | 4.35 | |
| F | 42.030 *** | 238.378 *** | 73.285 *** | 84.911 *** | 21.858 | 9.763 *** | |
Note: *** p < 0.001, cluster 1: High level, cluster 2: Low level, cluster 3: Moderate level.
Results of differences between clusters by Professionalism perception.
| Function | Cluster | Mean | S.D. | F |
| Post-Hoc Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vocational expertise | 1 | 4.327 | 0.050 | 42.030 | 0.000 | 1 < 3 < 1 |
| 2 | 3.590 | 0.068 | ||||
| 3 | 4.282 | 0.063 | ||||
| Work autonomy | 1 | 4.523 | 0.048 | 238.378 | 0.000 | 2 < 3 < 1 |
| 2 | 2.836 | 0.065 | ||||
| 3 | 4.352 | 0.060 | ||||
| Social contribution | 1 | 4.482 | 0.048 | 73.285 | 0.000 | 2 < 3 < 1 |
| 2 | 3.525 | 0.065 | ||||
| 3 | 4.346 | 0.061 | ||||
| Social status | 1 | 3.111 | 0.060 | 84.911 | 0.000 | 3 < 2 < 1 |
| 2 | 2.404 | 0.081 | ||||
| 3 | 1.871 | 0.076 | ||||
| Job ethics | 1 | 4.342 | 0.048 | 21.858 | 0.000 | 2 < 1 < 3 |
| 2 | 3.880 | 0.064 | ||||
| 3 | 4.410 | 0.060 | ||||
| Work functionality | 1 | 4.243 | 0.047 | 9.763 | 0.000 | 2 < 1 < 3 |
| 2 | 3.978 | 0.063 | ||||
| 3 | 4.348 | 0.059 |
Note: Wilks’ Lambda = 0.166, F = 56.85, p < 0.001.
Results of Discriminant analysis for clusters.
| Function | Eigen Value | Dispersion (%) | Canonical Correlation | Wilks Lambda | df | χ2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.584 | 80.2 | 0.849 | 0.170 | 8 | 420.541 *** |
| 2 | 0.639 | 19.8 | 0.624 | 0.610 | 3 | 117.381 *** |
| cluster title | cluster 1 | cluster 2 | cluster 3 | Total | ||
| High-level | 101 (91.0%) | 3 (4.9%) | 1 (1.4%) | 111 | ||
| Low-level | 1 (0.9%) | 57 (93.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | 61 | ||
| Moderate-level | 9 (8.1%) | 1 (1.6%) | 69 (98.6%) | 70 | ||
Note: *** p < 0.001, Discriminatory Hit ratio 93.8%.
Results of differences of job satisfaction by cluster.
| Function | Cluster | Mean | S.D. | F |
| Post-Hoc Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salary satisfaction | 1 | 4.52 | 0.44 | 28.13 | 0.000 *** | 2 < 3 < 1 |
| 2 | 3.93 | 0.64 | ||||
| 3 | 4.42 | 0.47 | ||||
| Work contents satisfaction | 1 | 3.11 | 0.80 | 28.39 | 0.000 *** | 3 < 2 < 1 |
| 2 | 2.72 | 0.84 | ||||
| 3 | 2.21 | 0.71 | ||||
| Satisfaction with Relationship with coworkers | 1 | 4.09 | 0.56 | 15.84 | 0.000 *** | 2 < 1 < 3 |
| 2 | 3.62 | 0.64 | ||||
| 3 | 4.16 | 0.64 |
Note: *** p < 0.001; Wilks’ Lambda = 0.631, F = 20.447, p < 0.001.
Results of differences of job performance by cluster.
| Function | Cluster | Mean | S.D. | F |
| Post-Hoc Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Job performance | 1 | 4.42 | 0.44 | 35.026 | 0.000 *** | 2 < 3 < 1 |
| 2 | 3.82 | 0.51 | ||||
| 3 | 4.33 | 0.47 |
Note: *** p < 0.001.
Results of Cross Tabulation of Professionalism Perception Segmentation and Demographic Characteristics.
| Characteristic | Professionalism Perception of the Convention Workers | χ2 |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cluster 1 | Cluster 2 | Cluster 3 | ||||
| Education | High school graduation | 7 (6.3%) | 1 (1.6%) | 8 (11.4%) | 17.003 | 0.009 ** |
| College graduation | 13 (11.7%) | 3 (4.9%) | 12 (17.1%) | |||
| University graduation | 67 (60.4%) | 51 (83.6%) | 38 (54.3%) | |||
| Postgraduate or above | 24 (21.6%) | 6 (9.8%) | 12 (17.1%) | |||
| Position | Employee | 24 (21.6%) | 23 (37.7%) | 10 (14.3%) | 15.188 | 0.056 |
| Chief | 15 (13.5%) | 8 (13.1%) | 10 (14.3%) | |||
| Deputy | 27 (24.3%) | 16 (26.2%) | 20 (28.6%) | |||
| Manager | 32 (28.8%) | 7 (11.5%) | 17 (24.3%) | |||
| Director or higher | 13 (11.7%) | 7 (11.5%) | 13 (18.6%) | |||
Note: ** p < 0.01.