| Literature DB >> 35627238 |
Chao Lu1,2, Yunxiao Wei1, Zhigang Meng1, Yongming Liu1, Abid Muhammad Ali1, Qinfei Liu1, Mubashir Abbas1, Yanan Wang1, Chengzhen Liang1, Yuan Wang1, Rui Zhang1.
Abstract
Although genetic transformation has opened up a new era for cotton molecular breeding, it still suffers from the limitation problem of long transformation periods, which slows down the generation of new cotton germplasms. In this study, LT gene (SV40 large T antigen), which promotes the transformation efficiency of animal cells, was codon-optimized. Its overexpression vector was transformed into cotton. It was observed that EC (embryogenic callus) formation period was 33% shorter and transformation efficiency was slightly higher in the LT T0 generation than that of control. RNA-seq data of NEC (non-embryonic callus) and EC from LT and control revealed that more DEGs (differential expression genes) in NEC were identified than that of EC, indicating LT mainly functioned in NEC. Further KEGG, GO, and transcription factor analyses showed that DEGs were significantly enriched in brassinosteroid biosynthesis pathways and that bHLH, MYB, and AP2/ERF were the top three gene families, which are involved in EC formation. In addition, the key genes related to the auxin pathway were differentially expressed only in LT overexpression NEC, which caused early response, biosynthesis, and transportation of the hormone, resulting in EC earlier formation. In summary, the results demonstrated that LT can promote somatic embryogenesis in cotton, which provides a new strategy for improving cotton transformation and shortening EC formation time.Entities:
Keywords: EC (embryogenic callus); LT gene; NEC (non-embryonic callus); somatic embryogenesis; upland cotton
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35627238 PMCID: PMC9140353 DOI: 10.3390/genes13050853
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.141
Figure 1Codon optimization and vector construction of LT gene. (a) Original codon usage adjusted. (b) Optimized codon usage adjusted. (c) Original sequence codon. (d) Optimized Sequence codon. (e) Original GC content. (f) Optimized GC content. (g) Vector map of LT gene over-expression and control, the vector uses the CaMV 35S promoter and the kanR resistance gene.
Figure 2LT transformation promotes EC formation. (a) Cotton hypocotyl. (b) NEC of cotton. (c) EC of cotton. (d) Cotyledon embryo of cotton. (e) Validation of eleven EC by PCR. (f) EC of LT transformed T0 generation. (g) NEC of control T0 generation. (h) Significant difference analysis of NEC and EC numbers. (i) LT transformation promotes EC formation.
Transformation data for LT and control vector.
| Hypocotyl/Number | NEC/Number | NEC Acquisition Probability | EC/Number | EC Acquisition Probability | EC Formation Time/Day | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LT_vetor_1 | 50 | 50 | 1 | 4 | 0.08 | 100 |
| LT_vetor_2 | 50 | 50 | 1 | 4 | 0.08 | 100 |
| LT_vetor_3 | 50 | 49 | 0.98 | 3 | 0.06 | 100 |
| control_vetor_1 | 50 | 50 | 1 | 2 | 0.04 | 150 |
| control_vetor_2 | 50 | 49 | 0.98 | 3 | 0.06 | 150 |
| control_vetor_3 | 50 | 48 | 0.96 | 2 | 0.04 | 150 |
Figure 3Numbers of differentially expressed genes during somatic embryogenesis. (a) The DEG numbers of LT/EC vs. LT/NEC, LT/EC vs. control/EC, LT/NEC vs. control/NEC, and control/EC vs. control/NEC. (b) The Venn diagram of four groups with down-regulated genes. (c) The Venn diagram of four groups with up-regulated genes.
Figure 4GO and KEGG enrichment analysis of differential expressed genes during somatic embryogenesis. (a) GO enrichment analysis of DEG between LT/EC and control/EC. (b) KEGG enrichment analysis of DEG between LT/EC and control/EC. (c) GO enrichment analysis of DEG between LT/NEC and control/NEC. (d) KEGG enrichment analysis of DEG between LT/NEC and control/NEC.
Figure 5Transcription factors’ (TFs) analysis of differential expressed genes during somatic embryogenesis. (a) All TFs among the four samples. (b) Up-regulated TFs among the four samples. (c) Down-regulated TFs among the four samples.
Figure 6Analysis of genes associated with auxin pathways.
Figure 7qRT-PCR verification of selected DEGs. Data are presented as the means ± SD and the ubiquitin gene UBI3 was selected as internal reference.
Figure 8Mechanism analysis of LT transformation promotes EC formation.