| Literature DB >> 35627093 |
Maciej Ireneusz Kluz1, Karol Pietrzyk1, Miłosz Pastuszczak2, Miroslava Kacaniova1, Agnieszka Kita1, Ireneusz Kapusta3, Grzegorz Zaguła1, Edyta Zagrobelna1, Katarzyna Struś1, Katarzyna Marciniak-Lukasiak4, Jadwiga Stanek-Tarkowska2, Adrian Vasile Timar5, Czesław Puchalski1.
Abstract
Kombucha is a beverage made by fermenting sweetened tea with a symbiotic culture of yeast and bacteria. Literature data indicate that the kombucha beverage shows many health-promoting properties such as detoxification, chemo-preventive, antioxidant, antimicrobial, antifungal, and general strengthening. The research conducted focuses on the analysis of polyphenolic compounds formed in the fermentation process using ultra-efficient liquid chromatography, as well as on checking the antimicrobial properties of kombucha against pathogenic bacteria and yeasts found in food. Analysis of the composition of the tea mushroom (SCOBY) microflora using the MALDI TOF MS Biotyper mass spectrometer showed 8 species of bacteria and 7 species of yeasts. In vitro studies confirm the bactericidal and bacteriostatic properties of fermented kombucha beverages, with white and green tea beverages showing the highest antibacterial activity. The bacteria Staphylococcus aureus and yeast Candida albicans were the most sensitive to the effects of kombucha tea beverages. UPLC chromatographic analysis confirmed the presence of 17 bioactive compounds in kombucha beverages that can affect human health. The analyses conducted were aimed at indicating the best recipe and conditions to prepare a kombucha beverage, which allowed the selection of the version with the best health-promoting properties. Fermented kombucha teas contain many elements such as aluminium, calcium, iron, potassium, magnesium, sodium, phosphorus, and sulphur.Entities:
Keywords: ICP-OS; MALDI-TOF MS; UPLC; antibacterial properties; antioxidant properties; kombucha
Year: 2022 PMID: 35627093 PMCID: PMC9141729 DOI: 10.3390/foods11101523
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
The composition of the prepared kombucha beverages.
| No. Trials | The Composition of the Beverage |
|---|---|
| 1 | Black tea + Cane sugar |
| 2 | Black tea + Coconut sugar |
| 3 | Green tea + Cane sugar |
| 4 | Green tea + Coconut sugar |
| 5 | White tea + Cane sugar |
| 6 | White tea + Coconut sugar |
Measurement parameters and recovery rates of individual elements.
| Element | Measurement Linse (nm) | Recovery by CRM (%) | Recovery by (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al | 167.079 | 98 | 100 |
| Ca | 317.933 | 101 | 99 |
| Cu | 324.754 | 98 | 99 |
| K | 766.490 | 102 | 98 |
| Mg | 279.533 | 102 | 101 |
| P | 177.495 | 101 | 99 |
| S | 180.731 | 97 | 100 |
| Zn | 213.856 | 99 | 97 |
The detection limit for each element was determined to be no less than 1 µg/L.
Inhibition zone of growth inhibition for different species of bacteria and yeast (mm).
| Gram-Negative Bacteria | Gram-Positive | Yeasts | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type of Beverage | ST | EC | LM | SA | CG | CA | CK | CT |
| Black tea + cane sugar | 1.3 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 6.3 | 9.7 |
| Black tea + coconut sugar | 3.6 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 7.5 | 8.4 |
| Green tea + cane sugar | 9.0 | 7.0 | 8.0 | 5.3 | 7.3 | 6.7 | 9.7 | 6.0 |
| Green tea + coconut sugar | 4.3 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 7.7 | 7.8 | 8.3 | 4.7 | 7.3 |
| White tea + cane sugar | 5.3 | 7.7 | 8.0 | 10.3 | 8.0 | 10.0 | 5.3 | 7.7 |
| White tea + coconut sugar | 5.2 | 7.1 | 7.5 | 11.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 5.4 | 6.5 |
Note: Means ± standard deviation. Variants not sharing the same letter(s) are statistically significant at p < 0.05 (Tukey’s HSD). S. typhi PCM 2548—ST, E. coli 2209—EC, L. monocytogenes PCM 2606—LM, S. aureus PCM 502—SA, C. glabrata PCM 2703-FY—CG, C. albicans PCM 1407—CA, C. krusei PCM 2706-FY —CK, and C. tropicalis PCM 2703-FY—CT. ATB—positive control (Cefoxitin for G−, Gentamicin for G+, Fluconazole for yeast. ). —mean values denoted in rows by different letters differ statistically significantly at p ≤ 0.05.
Identification of bacteria using by MALDI-TOF MS Biotyper.
| Microorganism | Gram Negative | Gram Positive | Black Tea + Cane Sugar | Black Tea + Coconut Sugar | Green Tea + Cane Sugar | Green Tea + Coconut Sugar | White Tea + Cane Sugar | White Tea + Coconut Sugar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| + | − | − | + | − | + | − | + |
|
| + | − | + | − | + | − | + | − |
|
| + | − | + | − | + | − | + | − |
|
| + | − | + | + | + | + | − | − |
|
| − | + | + | + | + | + | − | − |
| − | + | + | + | − | − | + | + | |
|
| + | − | − | − | + | + | + | + |
|
| + | − | + | + | + | + | + | + |
Identification of yeasts using by MALDI-TOF MS Biotyper.
| Microorganism | Black Tea + Cane Sugar | Black Tea + Coconut Sugar | Green Tea + Cane Sugar | Green Tea + Coconut Sugar | White Tea + Cane Sugar | White Tea + Coconut Sugar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| + | + | + | + | + | + |
|
| + | − | + | − | + | − |
|
| − | + | − | + | − | + |
|
| − | + | − | + | − | + |
|
| + | − | + | − | + | − |
|
| + | + | − | + | − | + |
|
| + | − | − | − | + | − |
Bioactive compounds identified during UPLC analysis after 14 days of fermentation.
| No. | Compound | Rt * | UV–Vis * | [M−H]−
| MS/MS * |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Neochlorogenic acid | 2.79 | 299, 327 | 353 | 191 |
| 2 | Chlorogenic acid | 3.55 | 299, 327 | 353 | 191 |
| 3 | Cryptochlorogenic acid | 3.72 | 299, 327 | 353 | 191 |
| 4 | Catechin | 4.24 | 274 | 289 | 151 |
| 5 | Gallocatechin 3- | 4.33 | 274 | 457 | 305 |
| 6 | Coumaroyl quinic acid | 4.44 | 299, 311 | 337 | 191 |
| 7 | Quercetin 3- | 4.74 | 255, 350 | 755 | 609, 301 |
| 8 | Kaempferol 3- | 4.83 | 264, 355 | 563 | 447, 285 |
| 9 | Kaempferol 3- | 4.89 | 264, 355 | 563 | 447, 285 |
| 10 | Quercetin 3- | 5.2 | 255, 350 | 771 | 609, 301 |
| 11 | Kaempferol 3- | 5.35 | 264, 355 | 593 | 285 |
| 12 | Quercetin 3- | 4.46 | 255, 355 | 609 | 301 |
| 13 | Epicatechin 3- | 5.56 | 278 | 441 | 305 |
| 14 | Procyanidin A1 | 5.88 | 274 | 577 | 289 |
| 15 | Kaempferol 3- | 5.97 | 264, 350 | 739 | 593, 285 |
| 16 | Kaempferol 3- | 6.08 | 264, 355 | 593 | 285 |
| 17 | Kaempferol 3- | 6.39 | 265, 352 | 447 | 285 |
Note: * Rt—retention time, UV–Vis spectrum, [M−H]−—negative ion mode, MS—mass spectrometry.
Comparison of the elemental composition of different variances of kombucha on the 1st and 14th day of fermentation.
| Sample | Day | Al | Ca | Fe | K | Mg | Na | P | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Black tea + Cane sugar | 1 | 1.52 | 3.119 | 0.1281 | 79.01 | 5.323 | 5.652 | 6.637 | 5.362 |
| ±0.033 | ±0.027 | ±0.012 | ±0.68 | ±0.053 | ±0.064 | ±0.08 | ±0.026 | ||
| 14 | 2.102 | 8.087 | 0 | 69.6 | 6.066 | 3.12 | 6.448 | 5.406 | |
| ±0.217 | ±0.047 | ±0.072 | ±0.24 | ±0.4 | ±0.031 | ±0.061 | ±0.003 | ||
| Black tea + Coconut sugar | 1 | 1.678 | 9.268 | 0.1032 | 84.38 | 6.499 | 1.859 | 6.634 | 9.567 |
| ±0.101 | ±0.062 | ±0.0066 | ±0.46 | ±0.036 | ±0.013 | ±0.024 | ±0.074 | ||
| 14 | 2.51 | 10.75 | 0.0692 | 95.9 | 7.428 | 2.203 | 8.859 | 11.16 | |
| ±0.105 | ±0.16 | ±0.0269 | ±0.0015 | ±0.1104 | ±0.024 | ±0.051 | ±0.02 | ||
| Green tea + Cane sugar | 1 | 1.559 | 2.119 | 0.0466 | 50.28 | 2.65 | 0.658 | 4.201 | 4.012 |
| ±0.128 | ±0.02 | ±0.0002 | ±0.51 | ±0.031 | ±0.011 | ±0.054 | ±0.013 | ||
| 14 | 2.617 | 2.525 | 0.0334 | 56.05 | 3.002 | 1.014 | 5.332 | 4.531 | |
| ±0.167 | ±0.056 | ±0.0337 | ±0.84 | ±0.051 | ±0.018 | ±0.037 | ±0.017 | ||
| Green tea + Coconut sugar | 1 | 1.918 | 10.21 | 0.1393 | 68.24 | 4.652 | 0.8265 | 5.323 | 9.302 |
| ±0.14 | ±0.08 | ±0.0308 | ±0.24 | ±0.069 | ±0.0122 | ±0.062 | ±0.029 | ||
| 14 | 3.068 | 11.37 | 0.1067 | 75.49 | 5.143 | 0.8538 | 6.111 | 9.997 | |
| ±0.236 | ±0.13 | ±0.0446 | ±0.57 | ±0.016 | ±0.0158 | ±0.39 | ±0.051 | ||
| White tea + Cane sugar | 1 | 0.874 | 2.905 | 0.063 | 78.93 | 5.806 | 1.225 | 8.865 | 5.697 |
| ±0.145 | ±0.11 | ±0.0861 | ±0.78 | ±0.04 | ±0.009 | ±0.028 | ±0.028 | ||
| 14 | 1.572 | 3.201 | 0.087 | 83.85 | 6.156 | 1.148 | 10.31 | 6.108 | |
| ±0.129 | ±0.042 | ±0.0301 | ±1.01 | ±0.103 | ±0.016 | ±0.07 | ±0.014 | ||
| White tea + Coconut sugar | 1 | 1.04 | 10.57 | 0.1597 | 78.67 | 6.647 | 1.223 | 9.042 | 9.686 |
| ±0.117 | ±0.041 | ±0.0523 | ±0.55 | ±0.064 | ±0.026 | ±0.033 | ±0.07 | ||
| 14 | 1.456 | 10.41 | 0.0726 | 83.64 | 6.943 | 2.109 | 9.641 | 10.09 | |
| ±0.16 | ±0.052 | ±0.0637 | ±0.16 | ±0.039 | ±0.004 | ±0.062 | ±0.02 |
Note: Means ± standard deviation. Variants not sharing the same letter(s) are statistically significant at p < 0.05 (Tukey’s HSD). —mean values denoted in rows by different letters differ statistically significantly at p ≤ 0.05.
Comparison of alcohol, pH, and sugar content of different kombucha varieties on the 0, 1st, 7th, and 14th day of fermentation.
| Sample | Day | Alcohol | pH | Saccharose |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Black tea + Cane sugar | 0 | 0.0 ± 0.00 | 5.87 ± 0.02 | 7.04 ± 0.09 |
| 1 | 0.3 ± 0.00 | 3.35 ± 0.01 | 6.95 ± 0.35 | |
| 7 | 3.5 ± 0.50 | 2.60 ± 0.02 | 6.78 ± 0.00 | |
| 14 | 4.85 ± 0.50 | 2.44 ± 0.02 | 5.64 ± 0.00 | |
| Black tea + Coconut sugar | 0 | 0.0 ± 0.00 | 5.54 ± 0.02 | 7.06 ± 0.02 |
| 1 | 0.4 ± 0.00 | 3.51 ± 0.04 | 6.65 ± 0.25 | |
| 7 | 3.25 ± 0.00 | 2.63 ± 0.03 | 6.22 ± 0.00 | |
| 14 | 4.00 ± 0.00 | 2.58 ± 0.02 | 5.59 ± 0.00 | |
| Green tea + Cane sugar | 0 | 0.0 ± 0.00 | 5.87 ± 0.03 | 7.13 ± 0.09 |
| 1 | 0.3 ± 0.50 | 3.54 ± 0.04 | 6.73 ± 0.35 | |
| 7 | 3.4 ± 0.00 | 2.61 ± 0.03 | 6.35 ± 0.00 | |
| 14 | 4.00 ± 0.00 | 2.40 ± 0.02 | 5.72 ± 0.00 | |
| Green tea + Coconut sugar | 0 | 0.0 ± 0.00 | 5.62 ± 0.04 | 7.11 ± 0.09 |
| 1 | 0.2 ± 0.00 | 3.75 ± 0.03 | 6.79 ± 0.35 | |
| 7 | 3.50 ± 0.50 | 2.60 ± 0.02 | 6.46 ± 0.00 | |
| 14 | 4.95 ± 0.50 | 2.56 ± 0.02 | 5.70 ± 0.00 | |
| White tea + Cane sugar | 0 | 0.0 ± 0.00 | 5.64 ± 0.04 | 7.15 ± 0.09 |
| 1 | 0.4 ± 0.00 | 3.72 ± 0.02 | 6.59 ± 0.35 | |
| 7 | 3.0 ± 0.00 | 2.81 ± 0.01 | 6.47 ± 0.00 | |
| 14 | 4.50 ± 0.00 | 2.72 ± 0.02 | 5.64 ± 0.00 | |
| White tea + Coconut sugar | 0 | 0.0 ± 0.00 | 5.70 ± 0.09 | 7.17 ± 0.09 |
| 1 | 0.2 ± 0.50 | 3.25 ± 0.35 | 6.63 ± 0.35 | |
| 7 | 3.25 ± 0.50 | 2.74 ± 0.09 | 6.29 ± 0.00 | |
| 14 | 4.75 ± 0.00 | 2.65 ± 0.35 | 5.84 ± 0.00 |
Figure 1Organoleptic assessment of six variants of kombucha (own elaboration); Samples: 1—Black tea + Cane sugar, 2—Black tea + Coconut sugar, 3—Green tea + Cane sugar, 4—Green tea + Coconut sugar, 5—White tea + Cane sugar, and 6—White tea + Coconut sugar.