| Literature DB >> 35626418 |
Xin Cao1,2, Qingluan Yang3,4, Xian Zhou3,4, Kun Lv1,2, Zhe Zhou3, Feng Sun3,4, Qiaoling Ruan3,4, Jun Zhang1,2, Lingyun Shao3,4, Daoying Geng1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used in the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (TBM) and its complications. We aimed to explore the relationship between MRI features and neurological deficits and TBM patients' prognosis.Entities:
Keywords: cerebral infarction; hydrocephalus; magnetic resonance imaging; neurological deficits; prognosis; tuberculosis meningitis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35626418 PMCID: PMC9141437 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051264
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) ISSN: 2075-4418
The characteristics of TBM and its complications on each MRI sequence image and the feature information to be recorded.
| T1WI | T2WI | FLAIR | DWI | Enhanced T1WI | Information to Be Recorded | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| / | / | / | / | Linear enhancement along the meninges | Location: suprasellar cistern, ambient cistern, lateral fissure cistern, interhemispheric fissure cistern, tentorium cerebelli, spinal cord membrane, and other meninges |
|
| Nodules with equal or slightly low signal intensity | The liquefaction part of the nodule shows high signal intensity, and the non-liquefied caseous necrosis part shows low signal intensity | The liquefaction part of the nodule center shows low signal intensity, the non-liquefied caseous necrosis part shows equal signal intensity, and the tumor wall shows high signal intensity | Low signal intensity | Uniform or circular enhancement | Location: frontal lobe, parietal lobe, temporal lobe, occipital lobe, corpus callosum, basal ganglia, cerebellum, brain stem, and meninges |
|
| Low signal intensity | High signal intensity | High signal intensity | High signal intensity | Enhanced lesion area | Location: frontal lobe, parietal lobe, temporal lobe, and occipital lobe |
|
| Low signal intensity | High signal intensity | Low signal intensity | Low signal intensity | No enhancement in lesion area | Location: frontal lobe, parietal lobe, temporal lobe, and occipital lobe |
|
| The abscess cavity shows low signal intensity, and the abscess wall shows equal signal intensity | The abscess cavity shows high signal intensity, and the abscess wall shows slightly high signal intensity | The abscess cavity shows slightly low signal intensity, and the abscess wall shows slightly high signal intensity | The abscess cavity shows high signal intensity | The abscess wall shows obvious circular enhancement | Does the patient have a brain abscess? |
|
| Enlargement of the ventricles without widened sulci | Does the patient have hydrocephalus? | ||||
|
| Including the scope of meningeal enhancement and the size of tuberculoma and abscess | Increase in size was recorded as “1”, unchanged as “0”, and decrease as “−1” | ||||
|
| Including the number of tuberculoma and abscess | Increase in quantity was recorded as “1”, unchanged as “0”, and decrease as “−1” | ||||
|
| Reflected by Evan’s ratio | Increase in the Evan’s ratio was recorded as “1”, unchanged as “0”, and decrease as “−1” | ||||
Figure 1A 26-year-old female. There was exudation in her skull base, and the meninges of the ambient cistern and lateral fissure cistern were enhanced on T1WI ((b), white arrow). She had ACI in the bilateral basal ganglia, which showed hyperintensity on DWI ((c), white arrows). One month later, the patient was reexamined with MRI. She developed moderate hydrocephalus with an Evan’s ratio of 0.35 (d), compared with the initial Evan’s ratio of 0.30 (a). There are countless tuberculomas in the meninges ((e), white arrows) and brain parenchyma ((f), white arrows), showing obvious homogeneous nodular enhancement. Another 70-year-old female. She had several brain abscesses in the right parietal lobe and multiple OCIs in the radiated coronal area ((g), white arrow). The abscess wall showed ring-shaped enhancement ((h), white arrow), and the abscess cavity showed obvious high signal intensity on DWI ((i), white arrow).
Clinical characteristics of the study’s cohort.
| TBM Diagnosis (n, %) | N = 110 |
|---|---|
|
| 33 (30.00%) |
|
| 55 (50.00%) |
|
| 22 (20.00%) |
|
| 43.17 ± 16.90 |
|
| |
|
| 70 (63.64%) |
|
| 40 (36.36%) |
|
| |
|
| 18 (16.36%) |
|
| 39 (35.45%) |
|
| 35 (31.82%) |
|
| 46 (41.82%) |
|
| |
|
| 0.28 ± 0.10 |
|
| 2061.00 (1260.00, 3519.00) |
|
| 120.00 (40.00, 316.00) |
|
| |
|
| 31 (28.44%) |
|
| 59 (54.13%) |
|
| 19 (17.43%) |
|
| |
|
| 59 (54.63%) |
|
| 25 (23.15%) |
|
| 7 (6.48%) |
|
| 6 (5.56%) |
|
| 4 (3.70%) |
|
| 7 (6.48%) |
CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; WBC, white blood cell; MRC, Medical Research Council; MRS, Modified Rankin Scale.
MRI features of TBM patients with different degrees of neurological deficit.
| MRC I (n = 31) | MRC II (n = 59) | MRC III (n = 19) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 18 (58.06) | 39 (66.10) | 14 (73.68) | 0.52 |
|
| 8 (25.81) | 16 (27.12) | 11 (57.89) | 0.03 |
|
| 14 (45.16) | 25 (42.37) | 10 (52.63) | 0.74 |
|
| 7 (22.58) | 19 (32.20) | 10 (52.63) | 0.09 |
|
| 3 (9.68) | 15 (25.42) | 5 (26.32) | 0.81 |
|
| 5 (16.13) | 17 (28.81) | 7 (36.84) | 0.23 |
|
| 10 (32.26) | 15 (25.42) | 10 (52.63) | 0.09 |
|
| 5 (16.13) | 20 (33.90) | 9 (47.37) | 0.06 |
|
| 13 (41.94) | 22 (37.29) | 12 (63.16) | 0.14 |
|
| 11 (35.48) | 17 (28.81) | 11 (57.89) | 0.07 |
|
| 7 (22.58) | 12 (20.34) | 8 (42.11) | 0.15 |
|
| 6 (19.35) | 9 (15.25) | 7 (36.84) | 0.12 |
|
| 5 (16.13) | 12 (20.34) | 8 (42.11) | 0.08 |
|
| 2 (6.45) | 10 (16.95) | 5 (26.32) | 0.16 |
|
| 1 (3.23) | 3 (5.08) | 4 (21.05) | 0.04 |
|
| 3 (9.68) | 7 (11.86) | 6 (31.58) | 0.07 |
|
| 8 (25.81) | 12 (20.34) | 6 (31.58) | 0.58 |
|
| 5 (16.13) | 8 (13.56) | 6 (31.58) | 0.19 |
|
| 8 (25.81) | 14 (23.73) | 4 (21.05) | 0.93 |
|
| 3 (9.68) | 9 (15.25) | 5 (26.32) | 0.29 |
|
| 6.30 | 5.35 | 4.80 | 0.38 |
|
| 1 (3.23) | 14 (23.73) | 8 (42.11) | 0.00 |
|
| 1 (3.23) | 5 (8.47) | 6 (31.58) | 0.01 |
|
| 1 (3.23) | 4 (6.78) | 4 (21.05) | 0.07 |
|
| 0 (0.00) | 2 (3.39) | 5 (26.32) | 0.00 |
|
| 0.65 | 0.54 | 1.35 | 0.140 |
|
| 3 (9.68) | 7 (11.86) | 8 (42.11) | 0.00 |
|
| 2 (6.45) | 3 (5.08) | 6 (31.58) | 0.00 |
|
| 1 (3.23) | 3 (5.08) | 6 (31.58) | 0.00 |
|
| 1 (3.23) | 1 (1.69) | 5 (26.32) | 0.00 |
|
| 2 (6.45) | 3 (5.08) | 2 (10.53) | 0.70 |
|
| 10 (32.26) | 19 (32.20) | 9 (47.37) | 0.45 |
|
| 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.29 | 0.00 |
MRC, Medical Research Council; ACI, acute cerebral infarction; OCI, old cerebral infarction.
Figure 2The MRI features as the risk factors for assessing neurological deficits (a) and poor prognosis (b) in TBM patients.
MRI features of TBM patients with different prognosis.
| Rankin 0 (n = 59) | Rankin I (n = 32) | Rankin II (n = 10) | Rankin III (n = 7) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 37 (62.71) | 21 (65.63) | 7 (70.00) | 5 (71.43) | 0.95 |
|
| 25 (42.37) | 13 (40.63) | 6 (60.00) | 2 (28.57) | 0.60 |
|
| 17 (28.81) | 5 (15.63) | 2 (20.00) | 1 (14.29) | 0.48 |
|
| 19 (32.20) | 11 (34.38) | 5 (50.00) | 2 (28.57) | 0.73 |
|
| 7 (11.86) | 5 (15.63) | 3 (30.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0.31 |
|
| 6.10 | 4.50 | 5.50 | 7.65 | 0.41 |
|
| 8 (13.56) | 6 (18.75) | 5 (50.00) | 3 (42.86) | 0.03 |
|
| 2 (3.39) | 3 (9.38) | 3 (30.00) | 3 (42.86) | 0.00 |
|
| 1 (1.69) | 3 (9.38) | 2 (20.00) | 3 (42.86) | 0.00 |
|
| 1 (1.69) | 1 (3.13) | 4 (40.00) | 1 (14.29) | 0.00 |
|
| 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.50 | 0.69 | 0.865 |
|
| 9 (15.25) | 3 (9.38) | 5 (50.00) | 1 (14.29) | 0.03 |
|
| 3 (5.08) | 2 (6.25) | 2 (20.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0.30 |
|
| 12 (20.34) | 11 (34.38) | 7 (70.00) | 6 (85.71) | 0.00 |
|
| 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.00 |
ACI, acute cerebral infarction; OCI, old cerebral infarction.