| Literature DB >> 35626365 |
Abstract
Myopia is a global health issue, and the prevalence of high myopia has increased significantly in the past five to six decades. The high incidence of myopia and its vision-threatening course emphasize the need for automated methods to screen for high myopia and its serious form, named pathologic myopia (PM). Artificial intelligence (AI)-based applications have been extensively applied in medicine, and these applications have focused on analyzing ophthalmic images to diagnose the disease and to determine prognosis from these images. However, unlike diseases that mainly show pathologic changes in the fundus, high myopia and PM generate even more data because both the ophthalmic information and morphological changes in the retina and choroid need to be analyzed. In this review, we present how AI techniques have been used to diagnose and manage high myopia, PM, and other ocular diseases and discuss the current capacity of AI in assisting in preventing high myopia.Entities:
Keywords: artificial intelligence; deep learning; diagnosis and management; high myopia; machine learning; pathologic myopia
Year: 2022 PMID: 35626365 PMCID: PMC9141019 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051210
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) ISSN: 2075-4418
Figure 1General workflow of artificial intelligence analyses of high myopia and pathologic myopia.
Data-driven artificial intelligence (AI) models in high myopia and pathologic myopia.
| Research | Year | Materials | Participants | AI Methods | Main Outcome | Evolutions and Performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin, H. et al. [ | 2018 | Refraction data | School-aged children | ML | Predicting the presence of high myopia | AUC: 0.802–0.976 |
| Kaya, C. et al. [ | 2018 | electrooculographic data | Adults (25–65 years old) | ML | Detecting hypermetropia and myopia refractive disorders | Sensitivity: 95.5%; specificity: 96%; classification accuracy: 90.91% |
| Ye, B. et al. [ | 2019 | luminance, ultraviolet light levels, and step number data | Myopia patients | ML | Differentiating indoor and outdoor locations | Accuracy: 0.827–0.996; |
| Rampat, R. et al. [ | 2020 | Wavefront aberrometry data | General population | ML | Predicting subjective refraction | mean absolute error: 0.094–0.301 diopters |
| Tang, T. et al. [ | 2020 | Medical data | School-age myopic children | ML | Estimating physiological elongation of axial length | R square equals 0.87 |
| Wei, L. et al. [ | 2020 | Medical data | Myopia patients | ML | Improving the accuracy of IOL power predictions | mean absolute error: 0.25–0.29; |
| Yang, X. et al. [ | 2020 | Medical data | Primary school children | ML | Studying influence of related factors on incidence of myopia in adolescents | Accuracy equals 0.92–0.93; Precision equals 0.95; Sensitivity equals 0.94; f1 equals 0.94; AUC equals 0.98; Specificity equals 0.94 |
| Li, S.M. et al. [ | 2022 | Medical data | Primary school children | ML | Detecting risk factors for myopia progression | Combined weight: 77%; Accuracy: over 80% |
AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curves; ML, machine learning.
Figure 2Representative fundus photographs showing the different types of lesions of maculopathy in eyes with pathologic myopia. (A) Normal fundus image. (B) Tessellated fundus. (C) Diffuse atrophy around optic disc and posterior fundus (blue arrows). (D) Patchy atrophy fundus (white arrows). (E) A fundus image from a left eye with macular atrophy at the center of posterior fundus (black arrow). Patchy atrophy (white arrow) as well as diffuse atrophy background can also be seen. (F) Fundus image with myopic choroidal neovascularization at the center of fundus (yellow arrow). Reprinted from Deep Learning Approach for Automated Detection of Myopic Maculopathy and Pathologic Myopia in Fundus Images, Vol 5, Pages No. 1235–1244, Copyright (2021), with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 3Grading samples of myopic maculopathy in ocular coherence tomographic (OCT) images. (A). Myopic eye without myopic maculopathy. Each of retinochoroidal layer is clearly seen. (B). Myopic neovascularization (MNV). Hyperreflective materials can be seen above the retina pigment epithelium (RPE), and this component is attenuated in the tissue coherence signals below. (C). Retinoschisis. The splitting of the inner retina from the outer retinal layers with multiple perpendicularly aligned columnar structures connecting the split retinal layers. (D). Dome-shaped macular (DSM). An inward bulging of the retina pigment epithelium above the baseline connecting the RPE lines on both sides away from the DSM. (E,F). Retinal detachment. The neurosensory retina is detached from the RPE. (G,H) Macular hole. A tear above the RPE layer and an anvil-shaped deformity of the cracked edges of the retina. Reprinted from Validation of Soft Labels in Developing Deep Learning Algorithms for Detecting Lesions of Myopic Maculopathy from Optical Coherence Tomographic Images, Copyright (2021), with permission from Wolters Kluwer Health.
Figure 4Image-driven artificial intelligence in high myopia and pathologic myopia.
Image-driven artificial intelligence (AI) models in high myopia and pathologic myopia.
| Title | Materials | Year | Participants | Net Structure | Main Outcome | Evolutions and Performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Varadarajan, A.V. et al. [ | Fundus images | 2018 | Adults (40–69 years old) | ResNet | Extract refractive error | Mean absolute error of 0.56–1.81 diopters |
| Hemelings, R. et al. [ | Fundus images | 2020 | Not Mentioned | UNet++ | Detect PM and semantic segmentation of myopia-induced lesions | AUC: 0.9867; |
| Wan, C. et al. [ | Fundus images | 2021 | General population | VGG-Face | Grade the risk of high myopia | AUC: 0.9964–0.9968 |
| Du R. et al. [ | Fundus images | 2021 | Adults | Efficient Net | Identify the different types of lesions of myopic maculopathy | Accuracies: 87.53–97.50%; |
| Lu, L. et al. [ | Fundus images | 2021 | General population | ResNet | Automatically identify pathologic myopia, classify myopic maculopathy, and detect “Plus” lesions | AUC: 0.979–0.995; |
| Shao, L. et al. [ | Fundus images | 2021 | Adults (50–93 years old) | ResNetFCN | Quantitatively assess the fundus tessellated density and associated factors | Accuracy: 0.9652; |
| Li, J. et al. [ | Fundus image | 2022 | Adults | Dual-stream DCNN | Detect pathologic myopia and tessellated fundus | AUC: 0.970–0.998; |
| Sogawa, T. et al. [ | OCT images | 2020 | Adults | Multi-neural network | Identify images with myopic macular lesions and images with myopic macular lesions | AUC: 0.970–1.000; |
| Li, Y. et al. [ | OCT images | 2020 | Adults | VGGNet | Identify vision-threatening conditions | AUC: 0.961–0.999 |
| Cahyo, D.A.Y. et al. [ | OCT images | 2020 | Not Mentioned | Bidirectional C-LSTM U-Net | Volumetric Choroidal Segmentation | AUC: 0.92 |
| Du, R. et al. [ | OCT images | 2021 | Adults | DarkNet | Detect myopic neovascularization, myopic traction maculopathy, and dome-shaped macula | AUC: 0.946–0.985; |
| Chen, H.J. et al. [ | OCT images | 2022 | Adults | Region-based CNN | Segment and quantify of choroid | mean dice coefficient between automatic and manual methods: 93.87% ± 2.89%. |
| Park, S.J. et al. [ | OCT images | 2022 | Adults | Multi-neural network | Detect pathologic myopia | Accuracy: 95%; |
| Wu, Z. et al. [ | Fundus images/OCT images | 2022 | Adults | Multi-neural network | Predict optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived high myopia grades based on fundus photographs | AUC: 0.895–0.969; |
AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curves; PM, pathologic myopia; OCT, ocular coherence tomography; DL, deep learning; AUPR, areas under the precision–recall curves.