| Literature DB >> 35625153 |
Zain Ul Abadeen1,2, Muhammad Tariq Javed1, Tariq Jamil2, Azam Ali Nasir3.
Abstract
The present study was planned to evaluate the ameliorative effects of egg yolk antibodies (EYAs) in broiler chicken. For this purpose, 80-day-old broiler chickens were divided into four groups (A-D), where group A was kept as negative control. Experimental infection with C. perfringens (1 × 108 cfu/mL) was induced via oral route on days 17, 18 and 19 of the experiment in groups B, C and D. Groups C and D were passively immunized by anti-clostridial IgYs @ 1 mL per bird via oral and oral and intramuscular (I/M) routes respectively, on days 21 to 24, and on days 22 and 24 of the experiment, respectively. Two necropsies were performed (the first on day 26th and the second on day 35th). Birds in group B showed behavioral signs e.g., laziness, depression and diarrhea, gross post-mortem lesions e.g., increase in the relative weights (RW), due to acute swelling and congestion of liver and kidneys and ballooning and hemorrhages of jejunum and microscopic lesions e.g., congestion and necrosis in liver and kidneys' parenchyma and disrupted epithelium with fewer goblet cells in jejunum, compared to the group A. Birds in groups C and D, showed significant improvements in clinical and behavioral signs, RW of liver, kidneys and jejunum, swelling, congestion and mononuclear cells' infiltration in liver and kidneys and damages in the jejunal-wall, compared to group B. The most significant changes were found in birds of group C. Our study revealed ameliorative effects of EYAs on certain biological parameters however, further studies would be needed to justify a safer production and a reliable application of EYAs in NE outbreaks.Entities:
Keywords: Clostridium perfringens; egg yolk antibodies; microscopic; necrotic enteritis; passive immunization; pathological
Year: 2022 PMID: 35625153 PMCID: PMC9137529 DOI: 10.3390/ani12101307
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 3.231
Design and infection of the experimental birds.
| Groups | Treatment | Route | Dose | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | - | - | - | - |
| B | Per os | 1 × 108 cfu/mL | On days 17, 18 and 19 | |
| C | Per os | 1 × 108 cfu/mL | On days 17, 18 and 19 | |
| EYA | Per os | 1mL/bird | On days 21, 22, 23 and 24 | |
| D | Per os | 1 × 108 cfu/mL | On days 17, 18 and 19 | |
| EYA | I/M | 1mL/bird | On days 22 and 24 |
Scoring results of various clinical signs and behavioral symptoms in birds.
| Week | Signs | Score Range | Groups | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | |||
| 1 | Activeness | 0–4 | 4.0 ± 0.0a | 4.0 ± 0.0a | 4.0 ± 0.0a | 3.5 ± 0.53b |
| Fecal consistency | 0–4 | 4.0 ± 0.0a | 4.0 ± 0.0a | 4.0 ± 0.0a | 4.0 ± 0.0a | |
| Desire for feed | 0–4 | 4.0 ± 0.0a | 4.0 ± 0.0a | 4.0 ± 0.0a | 4.0 ± 0.0a | |
| Total | 12.0 ± 0.0 | 12.0 ± 0.0 | 12.0 ± 0.0 | 11.50 ± 0.53 | ||
| 2 | Activeness | 0–4 | 4.0 ± 0.0a | 4.0 ± 0.0a | 4.0 ± 0.0a | 4.0 ± 0.0a |
| Fecal consistency | 0–4 | 4.0 ± 0.0a | 4.0 ± 0.0a | 3.70 ± 0.48b | 4.0 ± 0.0a | |
| Desire for feed | 0–4 | 4.0 ± 0.0a | 4.0 ± 0.0a | 4.0 ± 0.0a | 4.0 ± 0.0a | |
| Total | 12.0 ± 0.0 | 12.0 ± 0.0 | 11.70 ± 0.48 | 12.0 ± 0.0 | ||
| 3 | Activeness | 0–4 | 3.80 ± 0.42a | 2.20 ± 0.42b | 2.20 ± 0.42b | 2.30 ± 0.48b |
| Fecal consistency | 0–4 | 4.0 ± 0.0a | 2.10 ± 0.32b | 2.20 ± 0.42b | 2.20 ± 0.42b | |
| Desire for feed | 0–4 | 3.90 ± 0.32a | 2.30 ± 0.48b | 2.40 ± 0.52b | 2.20 ± 0.42b | |
| Total | 11.70 ± 0.74 | 6.60 ± 1.22 | 6.80 ± 1.36 | 6.70 ± 1.32 | ||
| 4 | Activeness | 0–4 | 4.0 ± 0.0a | 2.30 ± 0.48bc | 2.70 ± 0.48b | 2.20 ± 0.42c |
| Fecal consistency | 0–4 | 4.0 ± 0.0a | 2.20 ± 0.42b | 2.60 ± 0.52b | 2.30 ± 0.48b | |
| Desire for feed | 0–4 | 4.0 ± 0.0a | 2.20 ± 0.42c | 2.40 ± 0.52bc | 2.70 ± 0.48b | |
| Total | 12.0 ± 0.0 | 6.30 ± 0.74 | 7.70 ± 1.52 | 7.20 ± 1.38 | ||
| 5 | Activeness | 0–4 | 3.90 ± 0.32a | 2.10 ± 0.32c | 2.80 ± 0.42b | 2.70 ± 0.48b |
| Fecal consistency | 0–4 | 3.80 ± 0.42a | 2.00 ± 0.0c | 2.70 ± 0.48b | 2.30 ± 0.48bc | |
| Desire for feed | 0–4 | 3.90 ± 0.32a | 2.20 ± 0.42c | 2.90 ± 0.32b | 2.60 ± 0.52bc | |
| Total | 11.60 ± 1.06 | 6.30 ± 0.74 | 8.40 ± 1.22 | 7.60 ± 1.48 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Mean values with different letters showed significant difference (p ≤ 0.05).
Mortality (%) in various groups of experiment.
| Group | Number of Dead Birds | Total | Mortality (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 5 | |||
| A | 0.0 ± 0.0a | 0.0 ± 0.0a | 0.0 ± 0.0a | 0.0 ± 0.0a | 0.0 ± 0.0a | 0 | 0 |
| B | 0.0 ± 0.0a | 0.0 ± 0.0a | 0.3 ± 0.5a | 0.2 ± 0.4a | 0.1 ± 0.3a | 6 | 30 |
| C | 0.0 ± 0.0a | 0.0 ± 0.0a | 0.2 ± 0.4a | 0.1 ± 0.3a | 0.0 ± 0.0a | 3 | 15 |
| D | 0.0 ± 0.0a | 0.0 ± 0.0a | 0.2 ± 0.4a | 0.1 ± 0.3a | 0.1 ± 0.3a | 4 | 20 |
Mean values with different letters have significant difference (p ≤ 0.05).
Relative weight of various organs (g) in the first sacrifice (Mean ± SD).
| Group | Carcass Weight | Liver | Kidneys | Jejunum |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 618.60 ± 1.96a | 4.08 ± 0.06d | 0.91 ± 0.03d | 8.89 ± 0.0d |
| B | 467.10 ± 1.72d | 4.82 ± 0.07a | 1.05 ± 0.02a | 10.54 ± 0.09a |
| C | 530.80 ± 2.15b | 4.27 ± 0.04c | 0.96 ± 0.02c | 9.45 ± 0.04c |
| D | 507.10 ± 1.73c | 4.47 ± 0.04b | 1.00 ± 0.02b | 9.84 ± 0.05b |
Mean values with different letters have significant difference (p ≤ 0.05).
Relative weight of various organs (g) in 2nd killing (Mean ± SD).
| Group | Carcass Weight | Liver | Kidneys | Jejunum |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1169.00 ± 4.99a | 2.56 ± 0.03c | 0.90 ± 0.01b | 7.41 ± 0.05d |
| B | 757.80 ± 6.17d | 3.31 ± 0.06a | 1.03 ± 0.03a | 8.42 ± 0.06a |
| C | 1019.20 ± 4.80b | 2.60 ± 0.02c | 0.92 ± 0.01b | 7.83 ± 0.03c |
| D | 969.90 ± 4.97c | 2.70 ± 0.01b | 0.92 ± 0.01b | 7.91 ± 0.04b |
Mean values with different letters have significant difference (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 1Photographs showing gross lesions in various organs (A) Swollen and congested liver from group B, while liver from group A has normal size and color (B) kidneys showing severe congestion and swelling from group B, while kidney has a normal appearance in group A (C) Kidney showing moderate swelling and congestion in group D (D) Liver showing mild congestion and swelling in group C.
Figure 2Photographs showing gross lesions of intestines (A) Normal appearance of intestinal mucosa and absence of any lesion in group A (B) Jejunum showing hemorrhages and perforations in the mucosa of group B (C) Moderate mucosal damage and congestion in intestine of group D (D) Jejunum showing areas of small hemorrhages visible from outside (arrows) in group C.
Lesion scoring for the gross examination of various organs in birds.
| Group | Liver | Kidney | Jejunum | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN | EN | CN | EN | HM | MD | |
| A | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| B | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ |
| C | + | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | ++ |
| D | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
Scoring: absence of lesion (0%) = −, mild (≤10%) = +, moderate (10–20%) = ++, severe (20–30%) = +++, CN = congestion; EN = enlargement; HM = hemorrhages; MD = mucosal damage.
Figure 3Photomicrographs of liver showing microscopic changes (A) Liver from group A showing normal appearance of hepatocytes arranged in hepatic cords (H & E staining 100×) (B) Liver in group B showing hepatic cell necrosis (arrows) and congestion indicated by the presence of RBCs (asterisk) in parenchyma (H&E staining 400×) (C) Liver in group B showing the area of congestion (asterisk) and disorientation of hepatic cords with hepatocytes necrosis (arrows) (H&E staining 400×) (D) Liver showing hepatocytes with prominent nuclei and presence of mononuclear cells (arrow heads) in group C (H&E staining 400×).
Figure 4Photomicrographs of kidneys showing microscopic changes (A) Kidney from group A showing normal appearance of tubular epithelial cells and glomeruli (H&E staining 400×) (B) Kidney from group B showing presence of mononuclear cells and RBCs (arrow heads) and necrosis of tubular epithelial cells (arrows) (H&E staining 400×) (C) Kidney from group B showing areas of congestion (asterisk) and necrosis of tubular epithelial cells (arrows) (H&E staining 400×) (D) Kidney showing necrotic tubular epithelial cells (arrows), presence of mono-nuclear cells (arrow heads) and congested areas (asterisk) in group D (H&E staining 400×) (E) Kidney from group C showing the presence of few mononuclear cells (MC) and RBC (arrow heads) along with darkly stained nuclei of tubular epithelial cells at few places (arrows) (H&E staining 400×).
Figure 5Photomicrographs of jejunum showing microscopic changes (A) Intestine from group A showing (a) developed villi having intact epithelium (b) goblet cells (c) submucosa (H&E staining 100×) (B) Intestine from group B showing (a) damaged villi with disrupted epithelium (b) fewer goblet cells (c) submucosa (H&E staining 100×) (C) Intestine from group C showing (a) developed villi (b) goblet cells (c) submucosa (H&E staining 100×) (D) Intestine from group D showing (a) villi with damaged epithelium at few places (b) goblet cells (c) submucosa (H&E staining 100×).