| Literature DB >> 35625119 |
Alessandro Rocchi1, Jared Ruff1, Clay J Maynard1, Aaron J Forga1, Roberto Señas-Cuesta1, Elizabeth S Greene1, Juan D Latorre1, Christine N Vuong1, Brittany D Graham1, Xochitl Hernandez-Velasco2, Guillermo Tellez1, Victor M Petrone-Garcia3, Lauren Laverty1, Billy M Hargis1, Gisela F Erf1, Casey M Owens1, Guillermo Tellez-Isaias1.
Abstract
The goal of this research was to assess cyclic heat stress on gut permeability, bone mineralization, and meat quality in chickens. Two separate trials were directed. 320 day-of-hatch Cobb 500 male chicks were randomly assigned to four thermoneutral (TN) and four cyclic heat stress (HS) chambers with two pens each, providing eight replicates per treatment in each trial (n = 20 chicks/replicate). Environmental conditions in the TN group were established to simulate commercial production settings. Heat stress chickens were exposed to cyclic HS at 35 °C for 12 h/day from days 7-42. Performance parameters, intestinal permeability, bone parameters, meat quality, and leukocyte proportions were estimated. There was a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in body weight (BW), BW gain, and feed intake, but the feed conversion ratio increased in chickens under cyclic HS. Moreover, HS chickens had a significantly higher gut permeability, monocyte and basophil levels, but less bone mineralization than TN chickens. Nevertheless, the TN group had significant increases in breast yield, woody breast, and white striping in breast fillets compared to HS. These results present an alternative model to our previously published continuous HS model to better reflect commercial conditions to evaluate commercially available nutraceuticals or products with claims of reducing the severity of heat stress.Entities:
Keywords: bone mineralization; chickens; enteric inflammation; heat stress; parts weight
Year: 2022 PMID: 35625119 PMCID: PMC9138156 DOI: 10.3390/ani12101273
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 3.231
Evaluation of body core temperature, body weight (BW), body weight gain (BWG), feed intake (FI), feed conversion ratio (FCR), serum FITC-d, and bone parameters in broiler chickens during cyclic heat stress in trials 1 and trial 2.
| Trial 1 | Trial 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Thermoneutral | Heat Stress | Thermoneutral | Heat Stress |
|
| 40.17 ± 0.87 b | 42.37 ± 0.65 a | 40.68 ± 0.94 b | 42.11 ± 0.30 a |
|
| ||||
| BW (g) | 1674.4 ± 29.28 a | 1437.3 ± 26.89 b | 1574.4 ± 29.28 a | 1337.3 ± 26.89 b |
| BWG (g) | 1432.6 ± 24.32 a | 1205.3 ± 23.54 b | 1332.6 ± 24.32 a | 1105.3 ± 23.54 b |
| FI (g) | 2387.8 ± 35.75 a | 1999.5 ± 24.46 b | 2287.8 ± 35.75 a | 1947.5 ± 24.46 b |
| FCR | 1.444 ± 0.014 | 1.469 ± 0.019 | 1.454 ± 0.014 | 1.459 ± 0.019 |
|
| ||||
| BW (g) | 3035.8 ± 78.44 a | 2229.3 ± 52.55 b | 3207.3 ± 82.77 a | 2585.7 ± 17.16 b |
| BWG (g) | 2982.1 ± 78.01 a | 2172.3 ± 51.94 b | 1626.3 ± 92.62 a | 1263.5 ± 26.13 b |
| FI (g) | 4961.4 ± 129.66 a | 3968.3 ± 123.51 b | 5125.0 ± 80.81 a | 4379.3 ± 95.17 b |
| FCR | 1.635 ± 0.013 b | 1.781 ± 0.038 a | 1.581 ± 0.030 b | 1.695 ± 0.045 a |
|
| ||||
| Day 21 | 15.85 ± 7.10 b | 48.84 ± 10.17 a | 44.29 ± 14.31 b | 141.73 ± 15.74 a |
| Day 42 | 87.00 ± 17.47 b | 177.05 ± 15.73 a | 28.13 ± 10.55 b | 128.61 ± 10.73 a |
|
| ||||
| Day 21 | 18.93 ± 0.86 | 16.79 ± 0.94 | 16.50 ± 0.47 | 16.12 ± 0.46 |
| Day 42 | 39.71 ± 2.54 a | 22.37 ± 1.37 b | 34.18 ± 0.49 a | 24.43 ± 0.43 b |
|
| ||||
| Day 21 | 55.07 ± 0.56 | 52.57 ± 0.86 | 51.62 ± 0.32 | 51.43 ± 0.28 |
| Day 42 | 57.78 ± 0.66 a | 51.33 ± 0.76 b | 52.25 ± 0.44 a | 41.87 ± 0.59 b |
Data expressed as mean ± SE. a,b Values within rows with different superscripts differ significantly per experiment (p < 0.05). For performance, eight replicates per treatment group (n = 20 chickens/replicate). On days 21 and 42, blood and tibias were collected from three randomly selected chickens per pen (n = 24 per treatment group).
Carcass and part yields (%), muscle myopathy scores, and meat quality attributes of broilers from thermoneutral and cyclic heat stress groups in trial 2.
| Variable | Thermoneutral | Heat Stress |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Live weights (g) | 3282 ± 46.54 a | 2715 ± 37.55 b |
| Hot carcass | 72.16 ± 0.52 | 71.98 ± 0.43 |
| Fat | 1.40 ± 0.03 | 1.41 ± 0.02 |
| Chilled carcass | 74.37 ± 0.64 | 74.27 ± 0.52 |
| Wing | 7.67 ± 0.05 b | 8.00 ± 0.02 a |
| Breast | 20.17 ± 0.65 a | 18.49 ± 0.42 b |
| Tender | 3.55 ± 0.04 | 3.49 ± 0.03 |
| Whole leg | 22.51 ± 0.24 b | 23.55 ± 0.32 a |
| Rack | 20.47 ± 0.64 | 20.73 ± 0.52 |
|
| ||
| Woody breast | 0.63 ± 0.005 a | 0.41± 0.002 b |
| White striping | 0.87 ± 0.002 a | 0.78± 0.003 b |
| Drip Loss (%) 1 | 1.54 ± 0.03 a | 1.27 ± 0.02 b |
| pH | 5.85 ± 0.04 | 5.87 ± 0.03 |
| Lightness (L*) | 55.83 ± 0.42 | 55.63 ± 0.52 |
| Redness (a*) | 3.21 ± 0.01 a | 2.82 ± 0.03 b |
| Yellowness (b*) | 8.71 ± 0.04 | 8.48 ± 0.02 |
|
| ||
| Compression force (N) | 5.20 ± 0.04 b | 8.01 ± 0.05 a |
| Cook loss (%) 1 | 29.12 ± 0.44 b | 31.49 ± 0.53 a |
| MORS 2 Force (N) | 13.73 ± 0.32 b | 14.67 ± 0.37 a |
| MORS 2 Energy (N.mm) | 184.66 ± 1.42 b | 196.93 ± 2.27 a |
| MORS 2 PC 3 | 9.13 ± 0.03 b | 10.81 ± 0.04 a |
a,b Means without a common superscript were determined to be significantly different (p < 0.05). All values reported are on a percent basis in relation to live weight (n = 64 per treatment group). 1 Drip loss and cook loss were calculated as the percent loss method of initial minus final weight. 2 MORS—Meullenet-Owens Razor Shear. 3 PC—Peak counts.