| Literature DB >> 35624972 |
Yuan Li1, Mei-Yi Wang1, Meng Xu1, Wen-Ting Xie1, Yu-Ming Zhang1, Xi-Yue Yang1, Zhi-Xin Wang1, Rui Song2, Liu Yang1, Jin-Ping Ma1, Jia Zhang1, Chen-Xiao Han1, Cheng-Zhi Wang1, Wan-Ying Liu1, Wan-Hong Gan1, Rui Su1,3, Hai-Lin Ma1,3, Hao Li1,3.
Abstract
High-altitude exposure can negatively impact one's ability to accurately perceive time. This study focuses on Chinese migrants who have traveled to the Tibetan plateau and explores the effects of high-altitude exposure on their time interval judgment abilities based on three separate studies. In Study 1, it was found that exposure to high altitudes negatively impacted the time interval judgment functions of the migrants compared with a low-altitude control group; they exhibited a prolonged response time (540 ms: p = 0.006, 95% CI (-1.70 -0.32)) and reduced accuracy (1080 ms: p = 0.032, 95% CI (0.06 1.26)) in certain behavioral tasks. In Study 2, the results showed that high-altitude exposure and sleepiness had an interactive effect on time interval judgment (1080 ms) (p < 0.05, 95% CI (-0.83 -0.40)). To further verify our interaction hypothesis, in Study 3, we investigated the time interval judgment of interactions between acute high-altitude exposure and sleepiness level. The results revealed that the adaptation effect disappeared and sleepiness significantly exacerbated the negative effects of high-altitude exposure on time interval judgment (p < 0.001, 95% CI (-0.85 -0.34)). This study is the first to examine the effects of high-altitude exposure on time interval judgment processing functions and the effects of sleep-related factors on individual time interval judgment.Entities:
Keywords: high altitude; sleep quality; sleepiness; time interval judgment; time perception
Year: 2022 PMID: 35624972 PMCID: PMC9139562 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12050585
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Sci ISSN: 2076-3425
Figure 1The experimental procedure of the “single stimulus method”.
Figure 2The experimental procedure of the “synchronization method”.
Figure 3The difference in the accuracy rate of different groups in time interval judgment. * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01.
Figure 4The difference in the response time of different groups in time interval judgment. * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01.
Figure 5The replication time difference of the different groups for each stimulus in the synchronous stimulation method. * p ≤ 0.05.
Description of statistical and correlation analysis results.
| Languid/Vigorous | Accuracy of 1080 ms | Group | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Languid/vigorous | 19.04 ± 4.37 | 1 | ||
| Accuracy of 1080 ms | 0.66 ± 0.11 | 1 | ||
| Group | 0.38 * | 1 |
* p ≤ 0.05.
A moderated mediation model of languid/vigorous levels for temporal accuracy (1080 ms).
| Regression Equation | Fitting Index | Significance of Regression Coefficient | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Results of Variable | Predictor Variable | R | R2 | F |
|
|
|
| Accuracy of 1080 ms | Languid/vigorous | 0.50 | 0.25 | 2.66 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.87 |
| Group | 0.32 | 0.28 | 1.13 | ||||
| Languid/vigorous * Group | −0.17 | 0.07 | −2.58 * | ||||
* p ≤ 0.05.
The moderating effect of the plateau migration group and the plain control group on the accuracy of time interval judgment (1080 ms).
| Adjust the Variable | Effect | BootSE | BootCI-Low | BootCI-Upper | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | High-altitude migration group | 0.11 | 0.07 | −0.02 | 0.25 |
| Plain control group | −0.19 | 0.07 | −0.33 | −0.05 |
Figure 6A simple slope test for the accuracy of time interval judgment (1080 ms) of languid/vigorous levels in the different groups.
Descriptive statistics and correlation analysis results (N = 60).
| Languid/Vigorous | Accuracy of 1080 ms | Group | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Languid/vigorous | 18.80 ± 2.63 | 1 | ||
| Accuracy of 1080 ms | 0.66 ± 0.11 | −0.37 ** | 1 | |
| Group | 0.33 * | 1 |
* p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01.
The moderated mediation effect of languid/vigorous level on the accuracy of time interval judgment (1080 ms).
| Regression Equation | Fitting Index | Significance of Regression Coefficient | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Results of Variable | Predictor Variable | R | R2 | F |
|
|
|
| Accuracy of 1080 ms | Languid/vigorous | 0.56 | 0.32 | 8.62 | −0.59 | 0.13 | −4.67 *** |
| Group | 0.46 | 0.16 | 2.83 ** | ||||
| Languid/vigorous * Group | 0.45 | 0.19 | −2.33 * | ||||
* p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001.
The moderating effect of the acute exposure group and the plain control group on the accuracy of time interval judgment (1080 ms).
| Adjust the Variable | Effect | BootSE | BootCI-Low | BootCI-Upper | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | High-altitude migration group | −1.06 | 0.30 | −1.67 | −0.46 |
| Plain control group | −0.17 | 0.14 | −0.45 | 0.10 |
Figure 7Difference in accuracy at 1080 ms between the acute exposure group and the plain control group.