| Literature DB >> 35624822 |
Jacinta Collado-González1, María Carmen Piñero1, Ginés Otalora1, Josefa López-Marín1, Francisco M Del Amor1.
Abstract
In order to mitigate the detrimental impact that climate change is having on plants, the study of new practices that allow for the reduction of such effects has become imperative. In addition, the revaluation of the promotion of healthy plant by-products has also markedly increased in importance in recent years. In this work, the modifications in biomass and some antioxidant compounds of cauliflower by-products treated with putrescine under extreme temperatures in two different CO2 scenarios (the control (400 ppm) and a high concentration of CO2 (1000 ppm)) were studied. Additionally, the compositions of inner and outer leaves were also compared. According to results found in this work, cauliflower grown under elevated CO2 and treated with putrescine (2.5 mM) prior to heat stress showed the highest biomass accumulation (20%) compared to the control. Moreover, in the outer leaves from cauliflower grown under elevated CO2 and treated with putrescine prior to high temperature exposure, the highest biosynthesis of sugars (20%) was recorded. Although cauliflower by-products turned out to be rich in polyamines (208.6 nmoles g-1 fresh weight (FW) and 124.3 nmoles g-1 FW for outer and inner leaves, respectively) and phenolic compounds (1070.2 mg gallic acid equivalents ( (GAE) 100 g-1 FW in outer leaves and 772.0 mg GAE 100 g-1 FW in inner leaves), it was the outer leaves that after applying the new strategy showed the greatest increase in polyamines (68%) and phenolic compounds (39%), obtaining here the highest increase in antioxidant activity (3%). Thus, they should no longer be regarded as mere by-products and should be used for pharmaceutical or nutraceutical purposes. The novel strategy presented in this work may allow us to take advantage of both the continued increase in CO2 and heat waves that are becoming more frequent.Entities:
Keywords: climate change; health-promoting compounds; healthier cauliflower by-product; sustainable strategy
Year: 2022 PMID: 35624822 PMCID: PMC9137807 DOI: 10.3390/antiox11050958
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Figure 1The physical characteristics of cauliflower.
Figure 2The effect of the foliar application of putrescine (2.5 mM) on the plant height (A), the total leaf weight FW (B), the total number of mature leaves (C), and the total number of inner leaves (D) of the cauliflower cv. Moonshine at different CO2 concentrations and temperatures. The data are presented as the treatment means (n = 5). Different small letters represent significantly different mean values according to Tukey’s test at p ≤ 0.05. Abbreviations used: No Put: in absence of putrescine; with Put: after using putrescine; control T (28 °C day/16 °C night): plants grown under control conditions; and elevated T: plants under heat stress (43 °C day/30 °C night).
Figure 3The effect of the foliar application of putrescine on the concentrations of sugars (g kg−1 DW) in outer and inner leaves of the cauliflower cv. Moonshine at different CO2 concentrations and temperatures. The data are presented as the treatment means (n = 5). Different small letters represent significantly different mean values according to Tukey’s test at p ≤ 0.05.
An ANOVA analysis of sugars, AA, TPC, and polyamines affected by putrescine treatment, the level of CO2, short-heat stress, and the age of leaves.
| Attribute | T | Put | CO2 | AL | T * Put | T * CO2 | T * AL | Put * CO2 | Put * AL | CO2 * AL | T * Put * CO2 | T * Put * AL | T * CO2 * AL | Put * CO2 * AL | T * Put * CO2 * AL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inositol | *** | *** | *** | *** | ns | ns | ** | ** | ns | *** | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
| Glucose | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | ns | ns | ns | *** | ns | ns | ns | * | * |
| Fructose | *** | *** | *** | *** | * | *** | *** | *** | * | ** | ** | ns | ns | * | ** |
| Sucrose | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | * | *** | *** | * | ns | *** | * | ns |
| Total Sugars | *** | *** | *** | *** | ns | ns | ns | ** | ns | *** | ns | ns | ns | ns | ** |
| AA | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| TPC | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | ns | ns | ** | ns | *** |
| Putrescine | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Cadaverine | *** | *** | *** | *** | ns | ns | ns | * | ns | *** | * | ns | ns | ns | ** |
| Spermidine | *** | *** | *** | *** | * | ns | ns | ** | ns | *** | ** | *** | *** | ** | *** |
| Spermine | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Total PAs | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | ns | *** | *** | *** | *** | ns | *** | *** | ** |
The values are the means of five replicate samples; the means are within columns separated using Tukey’s multiple range test. p = 0.05; n.s.—non significant. *, **, and ***—significant at p ≤ 0.05, 0.005, and 0.001, respectively. Abbreviations used: AA: antioxidant activity; AL: age of leaf; CO2: level of CO2; T: temperature; PAs: polyamines; Put: putrescine; and TPC: total phenolic compounds.
Figure 4The antioxidant activity and total phenolic compounds in the outer and inner leaves of the cauliflower cv. Moonshine, along with the effect of short-term heat stress, CO2 concentration, and the foliar application of 2.5 mM putrescine. The data are presented as the treatment means (n = 5). Different letters represent significantly different mean values according to Tukey’s test at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 5The effect of the foliar application of putrescine on the concentrations of polyamines (nmoles g−1) in the outer and inner leaves of the cauliflower cv. Moonshine at different CO2 concentrations and temperatures. The data are presented as the treatment means (n = 5). Different small letters represent significantly different mean values according to Tukey’s test at p ≤ 0.05.