| Literature DB >> 35624722 |
Douglas Vieira Thomaz1, Renê Oliveira do Couto2, Riccardo Goldoni3, Cosimino Malitesta1, Elisabetta Mazzotta1, Gianluca Martino Tartaglia3,4.
Abstract
Wine is a complex bioproduct whose chemical composition is highly variable across production regions. In order to shed light on affordable ways to promote the characterization of wines and explore the physicochemical basis of their antioxidant capacity, this work reported on the quick and easy redox profiling of selected red wines from Apulia, Italy. Therefore, an affordable and quickly performed semiempirical quantum chemistry approach, i.e., the extended Hückel method, was used to compute the bandgaps of the main phytochemical markers attributed to red wines. The findings of these calculations were then compared to an electroanalytical investigation in the form of cyclic and square-wave voltammetry, and the electric current of the redox profiles was used as the input dataset for principal component analysis. Results showcased that the semiempirical quantum chemistry calculations allowed the correlation of the bandgaps to the observed faradaic signals upon voltammetry; thereby, also providing insights on their antioxidant appeal by highlighting the feasibility of charge-transfer processes at low electric potentials. Furthermore, the principal component analysis showed that the electric current dataset gathered in a time span of 55 s allowed the appropriate separation of the samples, which hints at the possible use of quick voltammetric assays as fingerprinting tools.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant; fingerprint; multivariate; nutraceutical; oxidation; redox; wine
Year: 2022 PMID: 35624722 PMCID: PMC9137507 DOI: 10.3390/antiox11050859
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Selected ubiquitous antioxidant markers in wine, as well as their structures, HOMO mappings and PubChemID. The electro-accumulation regions in the HOMO mapping are showcased in dark gray and red color, accounting for positive and negative charges, respectively. All atoms and bonds are colored in black to aid visualization.
| Compound | Chemical Structure | HOMO Mapping | PubChemID |
|---|---|---|---|
| Catechin |
|
| 9064 |
| Quercetin |
|
| 5280343 |
| Cyanidin |
|
| 128861 |
| Resveratrol |
|
| 445154 |
| Gallic acid |
|
| 370 |
Bandgap in eV of the proposed phytochemical markers in wine.
| Compound | HOMO (eV) | LUMO (eV) | ΔE (eV) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Catechin | −10.885 | 1.293 | 12.178 |
| Quercetin | −10.086 | −3.902 | 6.184 |
| Cyanidin | −3.965 | 0.887 | 4.852 |
| Resveratrol | −11.581 | −4.132 | 7.449 |
| Gallic acid | −11.026 | −3.01 | 8.016 |
Figure 1(A) CV and (B) SWV outputs of each selected red wine sample (A to F). The electric potential associated with the main possible faradaic signals which could be hinted at in the voltammograms is therein highlighted in red. The blank CV signal is represented in gray, and the SWV plot comprises the forward currents of each sample (therein indicated), and the reverse current is in light gray. Moreover, the possible physical origin of the signals is represented by the mechanisms as inset images.
Figure 2(A) Integrated charge of the chronocoulograms fitted according to Belehradek function (all fittings above r2 0.98). (B) Chronoamperograms extracted from CV scans. The samples are therein indicated (A to F). The time associated with the visualization of each faradaic process is highlighted on the chronoamperogram with a red color.
Figure 3(A) PCA biplot of the electric current of the first CV scan of each of the samples (label variables in red). The amount of variance explained by each PC is therein informed in percentage, and the eigenvectors of the discrete electric current values is therein represented in gray. (B) Plot of the eigenvalues versus PC number, which was used to refine the PCA.