| Literature DB >> 35624493 |
Anass Rami1,2, Naima Saeid3, Mohammed El Mzibri3, Khalid El Kari3, Mohamed Idrissi3, Houria Lahmam4, Fatima Zahra Mouzouni5, Samir Mounach5, Laila El Ammari5, Hasnae Benkirane4, Ayoub Al Jawaldeh6, Micheal Bruce Zimmermann7, Hassan Aguenaou4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Iodine deficiency disorders (IDD) affects nearly 1.9 million people worldwide. Iodine deficiency (ID) remains a public health concern not only for pregnant women, but for women of reproductive age (WRA) as well. This study was planned to evaluate the iodine status and the prevalence of iodine deficiency in a nationally representative sample of Moroccan WRA according to their socio-economic data and living areas.Entities:
Keywords: Iodine-rich food; Mοrοccο; Urinary Iοdine; Wοmen Reprοductive age
Year: 2022 PMID: 35624493 PMCID: PMC9137163 DOI: 10.1186/s13690-022-00901-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Public Health ISSN: 0778-7367
Socio-demographic characteristics of the studied population
| % [95%CI] | % [95%CI] | % [95%CI] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall ( | Urban ( | Rural ( | ||
| 18–29 | 29.2 [27.0–31.4] | 27.7 [24.9–30.5] | 31.4 [27.8–34.9] | |
| 30–39 | 36.2 [33.9–38.5] | 35.4 [32.5–38.5] | 37.5 [33.8–41.1] | 0.044 |
| 40–49 | 34.6 | 36.9 [33.9–39.9] | 31.1 [27.5–34.6] | |
| Single | 15.9 | 16.9 [14.5–19.2] | 14.2 [11.5–16.8] | |
| Married | 78.5 [76.5–80.5] | 77.2 [74.6–79.8] | 80.5 [77.4–83.5] | 0.404 |
| Divorced | 2.9 [2.1–3.7] | 3.3 [2.1–4.4] | 2.6 [1.3–3.8] | |
| Widow | 2.7 | 2.6 [1.6–3.5] | 2.7 [1.4–3.9] | |
| No formal education | 44.8 | 33.5 [30.5–36.4] | 62.0 [58.3–65.7] | |
| Primary | 24.8 | 23.6 [20.9–26.2] | 26.5 [23.1–29.8] | 0.001 |
| Secondary | 23.7 | 32.0 [29.1–34.9] | 11.0 [8.6–13.4] | |
| Superior | 6.7 | 10.9 [8.9–12.8] | 0.50 [0.1–1.1] | |
| ⩽338 | 79.6 | 73.5 [70.7–76.2] | 91.0 [88.2–93.1] | |
| 338–676 | 11.7 | 14.4 [12.2–16.5] | 6.7 [4.8–8.6] | 0.001 |
| 677–1128 | 3.2 | 4.1 [2.8–5.3] | 1.5 [0.5–2.4] | |
| ⩾ 1129 | 5.5 | 8.0 [6.3–9.7] | 0.8 [0.1–1.4] | |
| Zone 1 | 33.8 | 37.8 [34.8–40.8] | 27.9 [24.4–31.3] | |
| Zone 2 | 22.9 | 26.2 [23.4–28.9] | 17.9 [15.0–20.8] | 0.01 |
| Zone 3 | 30.6 [28.3–32.8] | 22.4 [19.8–24.9] | 43.0 [39.2–46.8] | |
| Zone 4 | 12.7 [11.1–14.3] | 13.6 [11.4–15.7] | 11.2 [8.8–13.6] | |
Values are percentage (95% confidence interval; 95%CI).
The chi-square test was used to compare percentages [95% CI] for different Socio-demographic categories between urban and rural areas.
* P value was calculated based on available data (n = 1118)
Anthropometric characteristics of the WRA
| Overall ( | Urban( | Rural ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |||
| Age (years) | 34.8 ± 8.5 | 35.1 ± 8.5 | 34.2 ± 8.5 | 0.999 a | |
| Height (cm) | 160.2 ± 6.1 | 160.4 ± 6.0 | 159.3 ± 5.9 | 0.640 a | |
| Weight (kg) | 68.6 ± 13.7 | 70.3 ± 13.9 | 66.2 ± 13.0 | 0.061 a | |
| BMI (Kg/m2) | 26.7 ± 5.1 | 27.1 ± 5.2 | 26.1 ± 4.9 | 0.097 a | |
| Nutritional status° | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | ||
| BMI (Kg/m2) | Thinness | 70 (4.2%) | 41 (4.1%) | 29 (4.4%) | 0.689 b |
| Normal weight | 544 (32.9%) | 292 (29.5%) | 252 (38.2%) | 0.001 b | |
| Overweight | 639 (38.7%) | 389 (39.2%) | 250 (37.9%) | 0.386 b | |
| Obese | 399 (24.2%) | 270 (27.2%) | 129 (19.5%) | 0.001 b | |
Values are mean (SD) and percentage [95% interval confidence (95%CI)]/ percentage.
Differences were calculated using interdependent t- test a and Pearson Chi-square test b.
° Body Mass Index calculated as weight in kg divided by height in meter square (BMI; kg/m2) was used to define Nutritional status as follow: Thinness (< 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5─24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25.0─29.9 kg/m2) and obese (≥ 30.0 kg/m2).
Median of UIC and iodine-to-creatinine ratio level of WRA according to living area
| Overall | Urban | Rural | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median [20th–80th] | Median [20th–80th] | Median [20th–80th] | ||
| UIC (μg/l) | 71.3 [37.5–123.1] | 75.9 [41.1–129.9] | 63.4 [33.8–111.6] | 0.0001 |
| Creatinine Concentration (g/l) | 0.93 [0.89–1.01] | 0.97 [0.91–1.09] | 0.86 [0.84–1.05] | 0.044 |
| I/Cr (μg/g) | 76.6 [43.9–146.1] | 78.1 [46.5–155.1] | 73.6 [40.2–140.8] | 0.01 |
a calculated using Mann Whitney u test
UIC urinary iodine concentration, I/Cr ratio iodine/creatinine ratio
Fig. 1Distribution of percentages of women with mild, moderate and severe iodine deficiency (ID) status overall and by area of residence
Urinary iodine concentration and iodine to creatinine ratio by nutritional and socio-economic characteristics of the studied population
| UIC | p value | I/Cr | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median [20th–80th] | Median [20th–80th] | |||
| 18–29 | 70.9 [37.5–118.6] | 0.394 | 75.1 [43.5–141.6] | 0.187 |
| 30–39 | 69.7 [35.8–122.2] | 74.8 [43.5–153.1] | ||
| 40–49 | 74.5 [38.7–127.2] | 80.8 [44.2–143.8] | ||
| Single | 75.1 [38.3–116.4] | 0.674 | 76.8 [46.1–140.0] | 0.722 |
| Married | 70.6 [36.9–124.9] | 76.6 [43.1–145.6] | ||
| Divorced | 73.7 [34.0–129.9] | 71.9 [43.7–210.2] | ||
| Widow | 83.1 [46.6–105.6] | 80.8 [52.7–164.9] | ||
| Illiterate | 69.7 [36.2–121.0] | 0.081 | 74.8 [41.9–151.4] | 0.629 |
| Primary | 74.6 [36.7–119.9] | 79.4 [47.7–143.7] | ||
| Secondary | 67.3 [38.5–124.1] | 76.0 [43.9–147.8] | ||
| Superior | 80.5 [39.6–132.6] | 76.4 [49.7–136.8] | ||
| Thinness | 74.5 [44.0–110.9] | 0.014 | 70.6 [45.6–136.8] | 0.269 |
| Normal weight | 66.1 [34.2–118.4] | 75.6 [44.1–143.9] | ||
| Overweight | 73.1 [36.7–121.9] | 77.4 [43.5–149.9] | ||
| Obese | 83.7 [42.5–132.4] | 79.4 [44.0–155.5] | ||
| ⩽ 338 | 74.9 [39.1–129.7] | 0.246 | 79.2 [47.1–150.2] | 0.899 |
| 338–676 | 83.1 [41.8–132.1] | 89.6 [46.9–175.8] | ||
| 677–1128 | 81.3 [40.7–115.2] | 76.2 [49.5–170.9] | ||
| ⩾ 1129 | 61.1 [41.1–129.2] | 84.4 [37.7–154.9] | ||
| Zone 1 | 78.1 [39.5–134.3] | 0.001 | 86.1 [48.4–164.7] | 0.001 |
| Zone 2 | 84.3 [47.4–134.1] | 82.2 [51.2–158.9] | ||
| Zone 3 | 56.6 [30.1–98.1] | 65.4 [37.1–127.1] | ||
| Zone 4 | 69.4 [39.9–131.8] | 67.6 [41.3–138.1] | ||
a p-value was calculated using the Kruskal Wallis test
* Calculated based on non-missing data (n = 1118)
Fig. 2Percentages of consumption of iodine-rich food by the studied population overall and by rural and urban areas