Jin Li1, Liwen Zhang2, Jiani Zhou1, Geng Wang1, Rui Zhang1, Jiaqing Liu1, Shili Liu1, Yong Chen1, Song Yang2, Quan Yuan1, Ying Li3. 1. Department of Social Medicine and Health Service Management, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China. 2. Chongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing, China. 3. Department of Social Medicine and Health Service Management, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China. lilyliying2012@163.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis remains a major threat to global public health. Regarding its control, directly observed therapy is not suitable as a global strategy for all tuberculosis patients. Self-management may be an important patient-centered tuberculosis case management supplement to directly observed therapy. However, there is currently no well-established instrument for measuring the self-management of tuberculosis patients. This study aimed to develop and validate a self-management scale for tuberculosis patients. METHODS: We developed an initial scale based on the tuberculosis health promotion indicators framework developed by our research group. After item analysis and two rounds of exploratory factor analysis, a final version of the scale was developed. A survey of 462 tuberculosis patients was conducted to develop and validate this scale. Cronbach's α and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess reliability, and Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to evaluate content validity. Fit indices, convergent validity, and discriminant validity were evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis to determine the construct validity of the scale. RESULTS: The scale was composed of 17 items in three dimensions ("adherence to treatment behavior," "transmission prevention behavior," and "supportive therapy behavior"). These three dimensions explained 76.60% of the variance. Cronbach's α of the scale was 0.905, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.897. Additionally, Pearson's correlation analysis showed that each item was strongly correlated with the dimension to which it belonged (r = 0.849-0.915, p < 0.01). Most fit indices (Comparative Fit Index, Normed Fit Index, Incremental Fit Index, Goodness of fit index) reached the recommended threshold, and the average variance extracted values of the three dimensions were higher than 0.5. The values of the square root of the average variance extracted within each dimension were greater than the correlation between dimensions, and all heterotrait-monotrait values were below 0.85. CONCLUSIONS: The self-management scale for tuberculosis patient demonstrated good reliability and validity and could be used as an instrument to evaluate the self-management of patients. Additionally, it could be used to develop evidence-based self-management interventions and evaluate those interventions.
BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis remains a major threat to global public health. Regarding its control, directly observed therapy is not suitable as a global strategy for all tuberculosis patients. Self-management may be an important patient-centered tuberculosis case management supplement to directly observed therapy. However, there is currently no well-established instrument for measuring the self-management of tuberculosis patients. This study aimed to develop and validate a self-management scale for tuberculosis patients. METHODS: We developed an initial scale based on the tuberculosis health promotion indicators framework developed by our research group. After item analysis and two rounds of exploratory factor analysis, a final version of the scale was developed. A survey of 462 tuberculosis patients was conducted to develop and validate this scale. Cronbach's α and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess reliability, and Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to evaluate content validity. Fit indices, convergent validity, and discriminant validity were evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis to determine the construct validity of the scale. RESULTS: The scale was composed of 17 items in three dimensions ("adherence to treatment behavior," "transmission prevention behavior," and "supportive therapy behavior"). These three dimensions explained 76.60% of the variance. Cronbach's α of the scale was 0.905, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.897. Additionally, Pearson's correlation analysis showed that each item was strongly correlated with the dimension to which it belonged (r = 0.849-0.915, p < 0.01). Most fit indices (Comparative Fit Index, Normed Fit Index, Incremental Fit Index, Goodness of fit index) reached the recommended threshold, and the average variance extracted values of the three dimensions were higher than 0.5. The values of the square root of the average variance extracted within each dimension were greater than the correlation between dimensions, and all heterotrait-monotrait values were below 0.85. CONCLUSIONS: The self-management scale for tuberculosis patient demonstrated good reliability and validity and could be used as an instrument to evaluate the self-management of patients. Additionally, it could be used to develop evidence-based self-management interventions and evaluate those interventions.
Authors: Martinho A P S dos Santos; Maria F P M Albuquerque; Ricardo A A Ximenes; Norma L C L Lucena-Silva; Cynthia Braga; Antônio R L Campelo; Odimariles M S Dantas; Ulisses R Montarroyos; Wayner V Souza; Alexandre M Kawasaki; Laura C Rodrigues Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2005-03-18 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Sara H Browne; Anya Umlauf; Amanda J Tucker; Julie Low; Kathleen Moser; Jonathan Gonzalez Garcia; Charles A Peloquin; Terrence Blaschke; Florin Vaida; Constance A Benson Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2019-10-04 Impact factor: 11.069