| Literature DB >> 35622679 |
Wei Yang1, Huiping Dai2, Lidia Skuza3, Shuhe Wei1.
Abstract
It is very important to increase phytoremediation efficiency in practice in suitable climatic conditions for plant growth through multiple harvests. Solanum nigrum L. is a Cd hyperaccumulator. In the present experiment, after applying different types of N fertilizers (NH4HCO3, NH4Cl, (NH4)2SO4, CH4N2O), root and shoot biomasses and Cd phytoextraction efficiency of S. nigrum effectively improved (p < 0.05). Shoot biomasses of S. nigrum harvested at the first florescence stage plus the amounts at the second florescence stage were higher than those harvested at the maturation stage, which indicates that S. nigrum Cd phytoaccumulation efficiency was higher in the former compared to the latter as there was no clear change in Cd concentration (p < 0.05). The pH value and extractable Cd contents showed no changes, regardless of whether N fertilizer was added or not at different growth stages. In addition, after N fertilizer was applied, H2O2 and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents in S. nigrum in vivo were lower compared to those that had not received N addition (CK); similarly, the concentration of proline was decreased as well (p < 0.05). The activity of the antioxidant enzyme catalase (CAT), harvested at different growth periods after four types of N fertilizer applications, obviously decreased in S. nigrum shoots, while peroxidase (POD) and superoxide dismutase) (SOD) activities increased (p < 0.05). Our study demonstrated that (NH4)2SO4 treatment exerted the most positive effect and CH4N2O the second most positive effect on S. nigrum Cd phytoremediation efficiency in double harvests at florescence stages, and the growth conditions were better than others.Entities:
Keywords: Cd-contaminated soil; antioxidant enzyme activity; exogenous additives; hyperaccumulator; phytoremediation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35622679 PMCID: PMC9144175 DOI: 10.3390/toxics10050266
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxics ISSN: 2305-6304
Experimental treatment with 4 kinds of nitrogen fertilizers.
| No. | Treatment | Dose (g∙kg−1) | Added Total N | Harvest Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | Control, no N addition | 0.00 | 0.00 | at maturation stage |
| F1 | NH4HCO3 | 1.68 | 300.00 | at the first florescence stage |
| F2 | NH4HCO3 | 1.68 | 300.00 | at the second florescence stage |
| F3 | NH4HCO3 | 3.36 | 600.00 | at maturation stage |
| F4 | NH4Cl | 1.14 | 300.00 | at the first florescence stage |
| F5 | NH4Cl | 1.14 | 300.00 | at the second florescence stage |
| F6 | NH4Cl | 2.28 | 600.00 | at maturation stage |
| F7 | (NH4)2SO4 | 1.41 | 300.00 | at the first florescence stage |
| F8 | (NH4)2SO4 | 1.41 | 300.00 | at the second florescence stage |
| F9 | (NH4)2SO4 | 2.82 | 600.00 | at maturation stage |
| F10 | CH4N2O | 0.65 | 300.00 | at the first florescence stage |
| F11 | CH4N2O | 0.65 | 300.00 | at the second florescence stage |
| F12 | CH4N2O | 1.30 | 600.00 | at maturation stage |
Note: doses of inorganic compounds are supplemented for analytically pure reagents.
Effects of different types of N fertilizers on Cd phytoextraction in S. nigrum.
| Treatment | Roots | Shoots | Shoot Cd Extraction |
|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 20.11 ± 0.55 a | 20.61 ± 0.63 a | 17.66 ± 0.57 e |
| F1 | 19.66 ± 0.37 a | 20.38 ± 0.31 a | 25.29 ± 0.56 d |
| F2 | 19.94 ± 0.66 a | 21.05 ± 0.26 a | 23.03 ± 0.49 d |
| F3 | 19.53 ± 0.24 a | 21.08 ± 0.25 a | 38.86 ± 0.58 b |
| F4 | 20.27 ± 0.42 a | 21.00 ± 0.45 a | 27.01 ± 0.68 d |
| F5 | 20.65 ± 0.27 a | 21.05 ± 0.23 a | 24.21 ± 0.28 d |
| F6 | 19.73 ± 0.41 a | 20.27 ± 0.34 a | 37.76 ± 0.79 b |
| F7 | 20.35 ± 0.68 a | 21.09 ± 0.21 a | 34.41 ± 0.30 c |
| F8 | 19.82 ± 0.41 a | 21.00 ± 0.30 a | 33.61 ± 0.39 c |
| F9 | 19.81 ± 0.49 a | 21.07 ± 0.05 a | 50.83 ± 0.55 a |
| F10 | 20.26 ± 0.75 a | 21.35 ± 0.32 a | 33.54 ± 0.33 c |
| F11 | 19.75 ± 0.58 a | 20.80 ± 0.23 a | 33.06 ± 0.35 c |
| F12 | 19.92 ± 0.24 a | 20.84 ± 0.48 a | 50.16 ± 1.02 a |
Note: Means of 3 replicates with standard deviation followed by the same letter within the same column are not significantly different (p < 0.05).
Effects of different types of N fertilizers on S. nigrum root and shoot biomasses (g plant−1).
| Treatment | Roots | Shoots |
|---|---|---|
| CK | 0.16 ± 0.01 e | 0.86 ± 0.02 e |
| F1 | 0.37 ± 0.01 cd | 1.24 ± 0.02 d |
| F2 | 0.35 ± 0.01 d | 1.09 ± 0.01 d |
| F3 | 0.41 ± 0.01 c | 1.84 ± 0.02 b |
| F4 | 0.39 ± 0.02 c | 1.29 ± 0.01 d |
| F5 | 0.37 ± 0.02 cd | 1.15 ± 0.01 d |
| F6 | 0.42 ± 0.01 c | 1.86 ± 0.01 b |
| F7 | 0.61 ± 0.01 b | 1.63 ± 0.03 c |
| F8 | 0.57 ± 0.01 b | 1.60 ± 0.03 c |
| F9 | 0.69 ± 0.02 a | 2.41 ± 0.01 a |
| F10 | 0.61 ± 0.01 b | 1.59 ± 0.02 c |
| F11 | 0.58 ± 0.02 b | 1.59 ± 0.02 c |
| F12 | 0.70 ± 0.01 a | 2.41 ± 0.02 a |
Note: means of 3 replicates with standard deviation followed by the same letter within the same column are not significantly different (p < 0.05).
Effects of different types of N fertilizers on H2O2 amd MDA in S. nigrum shoots.
| Treatment | H2O2
| MDA |
|---|---|---|
| CK | 0.46 ± 0.03 a | 6.27 ± 0.04 a |
| F1 | 0.31 ± 0.02 c | 5.57 ± 0.03 c |
| F2 | 0.32 ± 0.02 c | 5.55 ± 0.03 c |
| F3 | 0.39 ± 0.03 b | 6.00 ± 0.05 b |
| F4 | 0.31 ± 0.01 c | 5.51 ± 0.02 c |
| F5 | 0.30 ± 0.02 c | 5.53 ± 0.03 c |
| F6 | 0.38 ± 0.02 b | 6.02 ± 0.07 b |
| F7 | 0.33 ± 0.03 c | 5.50 ± 0.03 c |
| F8 | 0.29 ± 0.02 c | 5.52 ± 0.04 c |
| F9 | 0.37 ± 0.02 b | 6.04 ± 0.04 b |
| F10 | 0.30 ± 0.01 c | 5.49 ± 0.04 c |
| F11 | 0.34 ± 0.02 c | 5.52 ± 0.04 c |
| F12 | 0.38 ± 0.04 b | 6.03 ± 0.05 b |
Note: means of 3 replicates with standard deviation followed by the same letter within the same column are not significantly different (p < 0.05).
The two-way variance analysis of Cd phytoremediation and biochemical indicators in S. nigrum under different fertilizer types and harvesting mode treatments.
| Treatment | Root | Shoot (mg∙kg−1) | Shoot Extraction (μg∙Plant−1) | Root | Shoot (g∙Plant−1) | H2O2 (mg∙g−1) | MDA (μmol∙g−1) | Proline (mg∙g−1) | CAT (U g−1∙min−1) | POD (U g−1∙min−1) | SOD (U∙g−1) | Extractable Cd Concentration (mg∙kg−1) | pH Value of Soil |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F (FT) | 1.609 | 1.526 | 914.06 * | 1324.7 * | 1579.7 * | 0.325 | 1.404 | 0.335 | 0.212 | 0.329 | 0.18 | 0.035 | 0.021 |
| F (HM) | 2.03 | 0.884 | 2852.6 * | 166.4 * | 5376.2 * | 43.5 * | 663.2 * | 101.2 * | 58.9 * | 109.7 * | 48.5 * | 0.926 | 1.374 |
| F (FT × HM) | 1.061 | 1.988 | 18.29 * | 8.048 * | 27.3 * | 0.966 | 1.015 | 0.15 | 0.746 | 0.237 | 0.211 | 0.472 | 1.957 |
Note: means of 3 replicates with standard deviation with different letters in the column are significantly different at p < 0.05. F: F test. * is significant difference at p < 0.05. FT: fertilizer type. HM: harvesting mode. FT × HM: fertilizer type × harvesting mode. (df(FT) = 3; df(HM) = 2; df(FT × HM) = 6). F(FT): F (value) (fertilizer type); F(HM): F (value) (harvesting mode); F(FT × HM): F(value) (fertilizer type × harvesting mode).
Figure 1Effects of different types of N fertilizers on proline concentration (a) and the activity of CAT (b), POD (c) and SOD (d) by comparing single and double harvests of S. nigrum shoots (means with different letters in the panel are significantly different among treatments at p < 0.05. Error bars reported in figures are means of 3 replicates with standard deviation).
Figure 2Effects of different types of N fertilizers on extractable Cd concentration by comparing single and double harvests of S. nigrum (means with different letters in the panel are significantly different among treatments at p < 0.05. Error bars reported in figures are means of 3 replicates with standard deviation).
Figure 3Effects of different types of N fertilizers on pH in soil as demonstrated by comparing single and double harvests of S. nigrum. (means with different letters in the panel are significantly different among treatments at p < 0.05. Error bars reported in figures are means of 3 replicates with standard deviation).