| Literature DB >> 35622623 |
Andrés F Suárez1, Carlos E Camargo2, Miguel A Esteso3,4, Carmen M Romero2.
Abstract
Insulating oil contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) is an environmentally important pollutant. This research focused on the establishment of the optimum conditions under which photocatalytic oxidation can be used together with biotreatment using the Nostoc sp. microorganism to degrade PCBs present in used dielectric oils. Among the optimal conditions studied were PCB concentration, initial pH, and titanium dioxide (TiO2) concentration for the photocatalytic step, and PCB concentration and photoperiod for the biotreatment step. The results indicate that the optimal conditions necessary for photocatalytic degradation were a pH of 6.10, 113 mg/L TiO2, and 765 mg/L PCBs, achieving close to 90% removal. For the biotreatment step, the results showed that PCBs progressively inhibited the microbiological growth, with the lowest cellular growth observed in the medium with the highest PCB concentration.Entities:
Keywords: Nostoc sp. microorganism; biotreatment; photocatalytic oxidation; pollutants; polychlorinated biphenyls
Year: 2022 PMID: 35622623 PMCID: PMC9145893 DOI: 10.3390/toxics10050209
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxics ISSN: 2305-6304
Figure 1General molecular structure of PCBs.
Figure 2Schematic illustration for the photocatalytic treatment coupled to the biotreatment process of dielectric oils.
PCB species identified in the dielectric oil employed in this work.
| Peak No. | Retention Time (min) | Area (%) | Compound | ID Factor | Formula |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16.67 | 0.33 | 1,1′-Biphenyl, 2-chloro- | 86 | C12H9Cl |
| 2 | 19.67 | 3.81 | 1,1′-Biphenyl, 2,2′-dichloro- | 86 | C12H8Cl2 |
| 3 | 21.28 | 0.48 | 1,1′-Biphenyl, 2,6-dichloro- | 80 | C12H8Cl2 |
| 4 | 21.95 | 1.16 | 2,6-Dichloro-1,1′-Bifenilo | 77 | C12H8Cl2 |
| 5 | 22.45 | 11.29 | 2,3-Dichlorobiphenyl | 91 | C12H8Cl2 |
| 7 | 25.64 | 16.45 | 2,4,6-Trichlorobiphenyl | 91 | C12H7Cl3 |
| 8 | 26.13 | 2.27 | 2,6-Dichlorobiphenyl | 79 | C12H8Cl2 |
| 10 | 27.12 | 5.37 | 2,2′,5-Trichloro-1,1′-biphenyl | 84 | C12H7Cl3 |
| 11 | 29.16 | 1.06 | 2′,3,4-Trichloro-1,1′-biphenyl | 80 | C12H7Cl3 |
| 12 | 30.12 | 24.02 | 3,4,4′-Trichloro-1,1′-biphenyl | 94 | C12H7Cl3 |
| 13 | 30.88 | 7.58 | 2,4,6-Trichloro-1,1′-biphenyl | 88 | C12H7Cl3 |
| 14 | 31.67 | 2.48 | 2,4,6-Trichloro-1,1′-biphenyl | 83 | C12H7Cl3 |
| 15 | 33.01 | 9.73 | Methyl nonanoate | 90 | C10H20O2 |
| 16 | 33.74 | 2.88 | 2,2′,5,6-Tetrachloro-1,1′-biphenyl | 82 | C12H6Cl4 |
| 17 | 34.12 | 1.53 | 2,2′,4,5′-Tetrachloro-1,1′-biphenyl | 77 | C12H6Cl4 |
| 18 | 34.33 | 0.94 | 2,2′,6,6′-Tetrachloro-1,1′-biphenyl | 73 | C12H6Cl4 |
| 19 | 35.82 | 2.41 | 2,2′,4,5′-Tetrachloro-1,1′-biphenyl | 79 | C12H6Cl4 |
| 21 | 36.52 | 0.62 | 2,4,6-trichloro-1,1′-biphenyl | 80 | C12H7Cl3 |
| 23 | 37.28 | 0.73 | 2,2′,6,6′-Tetrachloro-1,1′-biphenyl | 82 | C12H6Cl4 |
Figure 3Surface response for the TOC removal of the photocatalytic experiments.
Figure 4(a) TOC removal percentage vs. time for the optimal of the SRM; (b) van’t Hoff adjustment of PCB removal data.
Figure 5Chloride ion concentration surface response.
Figure 6Surface response for PCB removal.
Results for the algae treatment of PCBs photocatalytic effluent.
| Experiment | Initial PCBs (mg/L) | Photoperiod (Light Hours/Dark Hours) | Cellular Density (Cells/mL) | Chlorophyll Content (µg/L) | Growth Inhibition % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 12/12 | 1.25 × 106 | 5.88 | N.A. |
| 2 | 2.0 | 12/12 | 3.09 × 105 | 1.49 | 74.7 |
| 3 | 5.0 | 12/12 | N.A. | 0.02 | 99.6 |
| 4 | 0 | 24/24 | 5.12 × 105 | 2.27 | 87.6 |
| 5 | 2.0 | 24/24 | 4.02 × 104 | 0.28 | 92.7 |
| 6 | 5.0 | 24/24 | 1.32 × 104 | 0.16 | 74.7 |