Literature DB >> 35622521

New alleles of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex gene phf-10.

Laura D Mathies1, GinaMari Blackwell1, Jill C Bettinger1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35622521      PMCID: PMC9010112          DOI: 10.17912/micropub.biology.000533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MicroPubl Biol        ISSN: 2578-9430


× No keyword cloud information.
A. The phf-10 locus produces at least three isoforms from two promoters. An alternatively spliced exon is indicated in grey and PHD domains are indicated by orange bars. Two new alleles of phf-10 , rd21 and rd22 , were created by CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing using guide RNAs targeting the first and fifth exons; V indicates cut sites. B. Effects of phf-10 alleles on development. Homozygous phf-10 mutants were derived from the indicated parental genotype; n = number of homozygous mutant animals scored. phf - 10(rd22) mutants had a low percentage of zygotic gonadogenesis defects and completely penetrant maternal effect embryonic and larval lethality. phf-10(rd21) mutants had very little lethality and no gonadogenesis defects. NA, not assessed. C. Acute behavioral responses to alcohol. Wild type worms (N2) develop AFT to ethanol, as indicated by a statistically significant increase in relative speed between 10 and 30 minutes of exposure. The degree of AFT is quantitated on the right Y-axis. Two loss-of-function alleles of phf-10 have reduced AFT to ethanol. phf-10(rd21) mutants develop AFT (left), but the degree of AFT is significantly less than N2 (right). phf-10(rd22) mutants do not develop AFT. Paired two-tailed Student’s t tests were used for statistical comparisons; **p ≤ 0.01, *p ≤ 0.05.

Description

We generated new loss-of-function mutations in phf-10 using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing. There are three described isoforms of PHF-10, resulting from multiple promoters and alternative splicing (Fig. 1A). In order to identify potentially null alleles, we used two guide RNAs designed to target the 5’ and 3’ ends of the gene and looked for large deletion events. We identified two alleles, rd21 and rd22 (Fig. 1A). The rd22 allele is a 4119 bp in-frame deletion that is predicted to result in a PHF-10B protein lacking amino acids 149 to 387, including the first PHD domain and part of the second PHD domain; PHF-10C is predicted to be absent and PHF-10A is predicted to be truncated after amino acid 148. We identified the rd21 allele based on its gonadal phenotype; rd21 is a 4 bp deletion resulting in a frame shift of PHF-10B after amino acid 329; it is predicted to have no effect on PHF-10A or PHF-10C (the mutation is upstream of the start of PHF-10C translation). The rd21 and rd22 alleles are expected to have different effects on phf-10 function as a result of their different molecular effects on the three PHF-10 isoforms. C. elegans SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes are required for a wide range of developmental processes, and loss-of-function alleles of SWI/SNF genes frequently result in embryonic or larval lethality (Cui et al. 2004; Large and Mathies 2014; Sawa et al. 2000; Shibata et al. 2012; Weinberg et al. 2013). We examined the phf-10 alleles for effects on viability and found that both alleles are homozygous viable; rd21 can be maintained as a homozygote, while rd22 is maternal effect lethal with its progeny dying as embryos or L1 larvae (Fig. 1B). SWI/SNF complexes control multiple aspects of somatic gonad development and loss-of-function mutations result in missing gonadal arms (Large and Mathies 2014; Shibata et al. 2012). We examined the phf-10 alleles for effects on somatic gonad development and observed a low penetrance phenotype of missing gonadal arms in phf-10(rd22) (Fig. 1B), indicating that phf-10 plays a role in gonadogenesis. We did not observe gonad defects in phf-10(rd21). Together with our molecular analysis, these results suggest that phf-10(rd22) is a strong loss-of-function and possible null allele and phf-10(rd21) is a weak hypomorphic allele. SWI/SNF subunits are also required for normal behavioral responses to alcohol (Mathies et al. 2015). We used locomotion assays to assess the behavioral responses to ethanol of the new phf-10 alleles (Fig. 1C). Wild-type worms have significantly reduced locomotion speed after a 10-minute exposure to ethanol (a measure of initial sensitivity) and they develop acute functional tolerance (AFT) to ethanol after 30 minutes, as indicated by an increase in locomotion speed at 30 minutes relative to 10 minutes. By contrast, we found that both phf-10 alleles had reduced AFT (Fig. 1C), in agreement with our previous phf-10 RNAi results (Mathies et al. 2015). The two different SWI/SNF complexes have distinct functions in the acute behavioral response to ethanol: PBAF is required for the development of AFT, while BAF is required for normal initial sensitivity to ethanol (Mathies et al. 2015). Our observation that two phf-10 loss of function alleles have the PBAF-like phenotype of reduced AFT provides support for the idea that PHF-10 is a subunit of the PBAF complex.

Methods

CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing: We chose two guide RNAs to target Cas9 to distinct sites spanning the phf-10 gene (Fig. 1A). sgRNA clones were generated by amplifying PU6::unc-119_sgRNA plasmid (Addgene plasmid 46169) using the Q5 Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit (New England Biolabs) with forward primers RA1065 and RA1066 to introduce the guide sequence and a common reverse primer RA1063 (Friedland et al. 2013). We used co-CRISPR to identify edited worms (Kim et al. 2014). Young adult N2 animals were injected with a DNA mixture containing the dpy-10 sgRNA in pDD162 (pSS4, 50 ng/ul), both sgRNA clones (50 ng/ul), and a dpy-10 repair oligonucleotide to create the dominant dpy-10(cn64) allele. F1 roller worms were placed three to a plate and allowed to self-fertilize. Once the food was depleted, a portion of the population was washed off the plate and treated with proteinase K to produce a crude DNA prep. These DNA preps were screened using primers flanking the two Cas9 cleavage sites (RA1084 and RA1085). Individual worms were isolated from populations containing a shorter PCR product to obtain homozygous phf-10(rd22) mutants. The rd21 mutation was isolated by selecting an F2 worm with a missing gonadal arm. The phf-10 locus was amplified and sequenced to determine the molecular nature of the alleles. The mutations were backcrossed nine times, alternately to N2 and a balancer chromosome (nT1 or eT1), to remove any off-target mutations that may have been introduced during the genome editing. phf-10(rd21) introduces a restriction length polymorphism and was detected using PCR with primers RA1067 and RA1068, followed by MfeI digestion. phf-10(rd22) was detected using PCR with primers RA1084 and RA1085. The resulting outcrossed strains are RA588 and RA598. Primers are listed in reagents. Locomotion assays: Locomotion tracking and analysis was performed as described previously (Davies et al. 2015). Briefly, assay plates were prepared by melting four copper rings into the surface of unseeded NGM plates to generate “corrals.” 100% ethanol was added to the plates at a final concentration of 0 mM or 400 mM, the plates were parafilmed, and allowed to equilibrate for one hour. Well-fed and uncrowded first‑day adult animals were transferred to a plate without food and allowed to acclimate for 30 minutes. Ten adults were transferred to each ring of an assay plate containing either 0 mM or 400 mM ethanol. After 10 and 30 minutes, 2-minute videos (1 frame per second) were taken using an Olympus SZX7 microscope with a Retiga 2000R camera (QImaging). An average speed was calculated for each ring and relative speeds (treated speed/untreated speed × 100) were used for statistical comparisons. Six trials were performed. Paired two-tailed Student’s t tests were performed in Prism 5, version 5.0a (GraphPad). Developmental phenotypes: Developmental defects were assessed using a dissecting microscope. Three young adult worms were placed on a plate and allowed to lay eggs for 18 hours before removing the adults from the plate; all homozygous mutant progeny from this collection were scored. Embryonic and larval lethality was scored 24-30 hours after the end of the collection window. Gonadogenesis defects were assessed in animals that survived to the fourth larval stage. Abnormalities in the morphology of the somatic gonad, such as missing gonadal arms, were recorded. phf-10(rd22) homozygotes were identified in the progeny of phf-10(rd22)/eT1[qIs60] worms by the absence of GFP expression in the pharynx using a fluorescent dissecting microscope. Strain Genotype Source N2 C. elegans wild isolate CGC JK2958 dpy-11(e224) unc-42(e270) V/ nT1[qIs51] (IV;V) CGC JK2992 dpy-11(e224) snb-1(md247) V / eT1[qIs60] (III;V) (Crittenden et al. 2019) RA588 phf-10(rd22) V /eT1[qIs60] (III;V) this work RA598 phf-10(rd21) V this work Primer Name Sequence RA1065 phf-10_sgRNA1 GGCGGCTCGGATCAATTGGgttttagagctagaaatagcaagt RA1066 phf-10_sgRNA2 TCTCGCGTCGCGATGAAATgttttagagctagaaatagcaagt RA1063 sgRNA_rev CAAACATTTAGATTTGCAATTC RA1067 phf-10_3'_for CACGGGTTTCTAATTTCCCCC RA1068 phf-10_3'_rev CCGATCACATCGATCGCAGA RA1084 phf-10_out_for GCATAAGAGCCAGCATTGGA RA1085 phf-10_out_rev CACCCTCGATACTTACAATAGG

Strain

Genotype

Source

N2

C. elegans wild isolate

CGC

JK2958

dpy-11(e224) unc-42(e270) V/ nT1[qIs51] (IV;V)

CGC

JK2992

dpy-11(e224) snb-1(md247) V / eT1[qIs60] (III;V)

(Crittenden et al. 2019)

RA588

phf-10(rd22) V /eT1[qIs60] (III;V)

this work

RA598

phf-10(rd21) V

this work

Primer

Name

Sequence

RA1065

phf-10_sgRNA1

GGCGGCTCGGATCAATTGGgttttagagctagaaatagcaagt

RA1066

phf-10_sgRNA2

TCTCGCGTCGCGATGAAATgttttagagctagaaatagcaagt

RA1063

sgRNA_rev

CAAACATTTAGATTTGCAATTC

RA1067

phf-10_3'_for

CACGGGTTTCTAATTTCCCCC

RA1068

phf-10_3'_rev

CCGATCACATCGATCGCAGA

RA1084

phf-10_out_for

GCATAAGAGCCAGCATTGGA

RA1085

phf-10_out_rev

CACCCTCGATACTTACAATAGG

  10 in total

1.  An Assay for Measuring the Effects of Ethanol on the Locomotion Speed of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Andrew G Davies; GinaMari G Blackwell; Richard C Raabe; Jill C Bettinger
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Multiple functions of PBRM-1/Polybromo- and LET-526/Osa-containing chromatin remodeling complexes in C. elegans development.

Authors:  Yukimasa Shibata; Masahiro Uchida; Hisako Takeshita; Kiyoji Nishiwaki; Hitoshi Sawa
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 3.582

3.  SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling regulates alcohol response behaviors in Caenorhabditis elegans and is associated with alcohol dependence in humans.

Authors:  Laura D Mathies; GinaMari G Blackwell; Makeda K Austin; Alexis C Edwards; Brien P Riley; Andrew G Davies; Jill C Bettinger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Components of the SWI/SNF complex are required for asymmetric cell division in C. elegans.

Authors:  H Sawa; H Kouike; H Okano
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  The SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex selectively affects multiple aspects of serotonergic neuron differentiation.

Authors:  Peter Weinberg; Nuria Flames; Hitoshi Sawa; Gian Garriga; Oliver Hobert
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  lin-35/Rb cooperates with the SWI/SNF complex to control Caenorhabditis elegans larval development.

Authors:  Mingxue Cui; David S Fay; Min Han
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Caenorhabditis elegans SWI/SNF subunits control sequential developmental stages in the somatic gonad.

Authors:  Edward E Large; Laura D Mathies
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Sexual dimorphism of niche architecture and regulation of the Caenorhabditis elegans germline stem cell pool.

Authors:  Sarah L Crittenden; ChangHwan Lee; Ipsita Mohanty; Sindhu Battula; Karla Knobel; Judith Kimble
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 4.138

9.  Heritable genome editing in C. elegans via a CRISPR-Cas9 system.

Authors:  Ari E Friedland; Yonatan B Tzur; Kevin M Esvelt; Monica P Colaiácovo; George M Church; John A Calarco
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-06-30       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  A co-CRISPR strategy for efficient genome editing in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Heesun Kim; Takao Ishidate; Krishna S Ghanta; Meetu Seth; Darryl Conte; Masaki Shirayama; Craig C Mello
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 4.562

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.