| Literature DB >> 35622447 |
Sol Laura Gutierrez Alvarez1, Christina Basse Riel1, Mahtab Madani1, Mohamed Abdellah2, Qian Zhao1, Xianshao Zou1, Tönu Pullerits2, Kaibo Zheng1,2.
Abstract
The linear and nonlinear optical parameters and morphologic dependence of CsPbBr3 nanocrystals (NCs) are crucial for device engineering. In particular, such information in asymmetric nanocrystals is still insufficient. We characterized the OPLA (σ1) and TPA cross sections (σ2) of a series CsPbBr3 nanocrystals with various aspect ratios (AR) using femtosecond transient absorption spectroscopy (TAS). The σ1 presents a linear volume dependence of all the samples, which agrees with the previous behavior in CsPbBr3 QDs. However, the σ2 values do not exhibit conventional power dependency of the crystal volume but are also modulated by the shape-dependent local field factors. In addition, the local field effect in CsPbBr3 NCs is contributed by their asymmetric morphologies and polar ionic lattices, which is more pronounced than in conventional semiconductor NCs. Finally, we revealed that the lifetimes of photogenerated multiexcitonic species of those nanocrystals feature identical morphology independence in both OPLA and TPA.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35622447 PMCID: PMC9189923 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c00710
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Phys Chem Lett ISSN: 1948-7185 Impact factor: 6.888
Figure 1(A) Normalized UV–vis and PL of samples. (B) Histograms of nanoplatelet thicknesses. (C) Diagram of nanoplatelets. (D) TEM top and side view of NCs. (E) Picture of an excited sample with 385 nm light.
Dimensions of Samples and OPLA and TPA Calculated Cross Sections Compared to Previously Reported Data
| sample | shape | thickness (nm) | length (nm) | volume (nm3) | AR | σ1 (cm2) | σ2 (GM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NPL-1 | NPL | 1.9 ± 0.4 | 13.9 ± 4.1 | 367 ± 171 | 0.14 | (4 ± 1) × 10–14 | (1.98 ± 0.09) × 106 |
| NPL-2 | NPL | 2.1 ± 0.4 | 16.3 ± 3.7 | 557 ± 208 | 0.13 | (5.7 ± 1) × 10–14 | (2.35 ± 0.07) × 106 |
| NPL-3 | NPL | 2.4 ± 0.5 | 11.0 ± 2.7 | 290 ± 117 | 0.22 | (1.6 ± 1) × 10–14 | (1.32 ± 0.08) × 106 |
| NPL-4 | NPL | 2.9 ± 0.9 | 10.5 ± 2.1 | 320 ± 134 | 0.28 | (2.2 ± 0.6) × 10–14 | |
| NW-1 | NW | 2.6 ± 0.5 | 49.5 ± 15.9 | 334 ± 140 | 19.04 | (2.8 ± 0.9) × 10–14 | (1.72 ± 0.06) × 106 |
| dSize-QDs1 | QD | 10.5 ± 0.5 | 12.2 ± 0.5 | 1345 ± 101 | 1.16 | (12 ± 2) × 10–14 | (4.5 ± 0.5) × 105 |
| QD | 8.7 ± 0.4 | 10 ± 0.5 | 760 ± 64 | 1.15 | (8 ± 1) × 10–14 | (1.8 ± 0.2) × 105 | |
| QD | 6.4 ± 0.4 | 7.4 ± 0.5 | 300 ± 40 | 1.16 | (3.1 ± 0.7) × 10–14 | (0.61 ± 0.04) × 105 | |
| QD | 4.5 ± 0.5 | 5.8 ± 0.6 | 120 ± 22 | 1.29 | (1.3 ± 0.4) × 10–14 | (0.29 ± 0.07) × 105 | |
| QD | 3.9 ± 0.5 | 5.2 ± 0.6 | 80 ± 16 | 1.33 | (9 ± 3) × 10–15 | (0.16 ± 0.03) × 105 | |
| dMorph8 | QD | 6.2 | 6.2 | 240.0 | 1.00 | 1.87 × 10–14 | NA |
| NPL | 3.1 | 9.8 | 300.0 | 0.32 | 2.68 × 10–14 | NA | |
| NW | 2.2 | 36.6 | 180.0 | 16.64 | 1.67 × 10–14 | NA |
dSize-QDs1 results from the study with different size QDs.
dMorph8 results from the study with different shape NCs.
Figure 2(A) OPLA cross section (σ1) at 400 nm vs volume. (B) Volume-normalized OPLA cross-section (σ1/V) vs thickness. (C) TPA cross section (σ2) at 800 nm vs volume. (D) TPA coefficient β vs thickness. Comparison of calculated results (This work) with reported results from (dSize-QDs)1 and (dMorph)8.
Figure 3Dependence of TPA coefficient β to AR of different-shaped NCs: blue squares are NPLs, and light blue triangles are NW. The green circles reported values of QDs, and the light green dots are calculated from local field theory at different AR for the different shapes. The AR is defined as ARNW = L/d for NW, with L = length and d = diameter, ARNPL = t/L for NPL with t = thickness and L = average length, and ARQD = l/l for QD.
Figure 4(A) Tail normalized GSB decay for NPL-1 excited at 400 nm. (B) Subtraction of one exciton decay from tail normalized GSB decay for NPL-1 excited at 400 nm. (C) Exciton lifetime at 400 nm excitation and 800 nm excitation in different thickness NCs. (D) Multiexciton lifetime at 400 nm excitation and 800 nm excitation in different thickness NCs.