Literature DB >> 35622212

Identification of a seven-gene signature predicting clinical outcome of liver cancer based on tumor mutational burden.

Yunlong Cui1, Ning Jiang2.   

Abstract

The total number of somatic mutations may affect the prognosis of cancer, so we applied bioinformatics methods to investigate the association between the TMB (tumor mutational burden)-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We calculated the TMB value of the patients with HCC in TCGA database and identified the differentially expressed genes between the high-TMB and low-TMB patients. We performed functional enrichment analysis and LASSO Cox regression analysis of the DEGs, and seven genes were screened to establish a risk score model. A nomogram based on the risk scores was drawn to assess the predictive outcomes compared to the actual outcomes. The expression level of the seven genes was verified in cancer cell lines. Moreover, we explored the difference in immune cells infiltration and immune checkpoints between the high-risk and low-risk groups. The results showed that the DEGs between the high-TMB and low-TMB patients were enriched in extracellular matrix organization. A seven-gene risk score model (PAGE1, CHGA, OGN, MMP7, TRIM55, MAGEA6, and MAGEA12) was established for predicting HCC prognosis. Patients with lower risk scores had longer survival time and lower mortality rate. The nomogram based on risk scores and TNM staging showed good performance and reliability in predicting the clinical outcomes. Significant differences in cell infiltration and checkpoints were found between the high-risk and low-risk groups. Our study demonstrated a seven-gene signature and a nomogram based on the risk score model to predict the prognosis of HCC. Some of the newly identified DEGs may be potential biomarkers or therapeutic targets.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japan Human Cell Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioinformatics; Gene signature; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Prognosis; Tumor mutational burden

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35622212     DOI: 10.1007/s13577-022-00708-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Cell        ISSN: 0914-7470            Impact factor:   4.174


  51 in total

Review 1.  Hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Alejandro Forner; María Reig; Jordi Bruix
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  AACR Cancer Progress Report 2018: Harnessing Research Discoveries for Patient Benefit.

Authors:  Rajarshi Sengupta; Karen Honey
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  Global Epidemiology, Prevention, and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Lung-Yi Mak; Vania Cruz-Ramón; Paulina Chinchilla-López; Harrys A Torres; Noelle K LoConte; John P Rice; Lewis E Foxhall; Erich M Sturgis; Janette K Merrill; Howard H Bailey; Nahum Méndez-Sánchez; Man-Fung Yuen; Jessica P Hwang
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2018-05-23

Review 4.  Laparoscopic vs open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: A meta-analysis of the long-term survival outcomes.

Authors:  En Lin Goh; Swathikan Chidambaram; Shaocheng Ma
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2017-12-25       Impact factor: 6.071

5.  Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Hai-Rim Shin; Freddie Bray; David Forman; Colin Mathers; Donald Maxwell Parkin
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Global cancer statistics.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Freddie Bray; Melissa M Center; Jacques Ferlay; Elizabeth Ward; David Forman
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 7.  Epidemiology and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Laura Kulik; Hashem B El-Serag
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Prognosis evaluation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy: comparison of BCLC, TNM and Hangzhou criteria staging systems.

Authors:  Chang Liu; Li-gen Duan; Wu-sheng Lu; Lu-nan Yan; Guang-qin Xiao; Li Jiang; Jian Yang; Jia-yin Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  An autophagy-related gene expression signature for survival prediction in multiple cohorts of hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Peng Lin; Rong-Quan He; Yi-Wu Dang; Dong-Yue Wen; Jie Ma; Yun He; Gang Chen; Hong Yang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-01-09

10.  Development and validation of a CIMP-associated prognostic model for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Ganxun Li; Weiqi Xu; Lu Zhang; Tongtong Liu; Guannan Jin; Jia Song; Jingjing Wu; Yuwei Wang; Weixun Chen; Chuanhan Zhang; Xiaoping Chen; Zeyang Ding; Peng Zhu; Bixiang Zhang
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 8.143

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.