Literature DB >> 35622106

Volume Load Rather Than Resting Interval Influences Muscle Hypertrophy During High-Intensity Resistance Training.

Ariel Roberth Longo1, Carla Silva-Batista2,3, Kelly Pedroso1, Vitor de Salles Painelli1, Thiago Lasevicius2, Brad Jon Schoenfeld4, André Yui Aihara5, Bergson de Almeida Peres1, Valmor Tricoli2, Emerson Luiz Teixeira1,2.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Longo, AR, Silva-Batista, C, Pedroso, K, de Salles Painelli, V, Lasevicius, T, Schoenfeld, BJ, Aihara, AY, de Almeida Peres, B, Tricoli, V, and Teixeira, EL. Volume load rather than resting interval influences muscle hypertrophy during high-intensity resistance training. J Strength Cond Res 36(6): 1554-1559, 2022-Interset rest interval has been proposed as an important variable for inducing muscle mass and strength increases during resistance training. However, its influence remains unclear, especially when protocols with differing intervals have equalized volume. We aimed to compare the effects of long (LI) vs. short rest interval (SI) on muscle strength (one repetition maximum [1RM]) and quadriceps cross-sectional area (QCSA), with or without equalized volume load (VL). Twenty-eight subjects trained twice a week for 10 weeks. Each subject's leg was allocated to 1 of 4 unilateral knee extension protocols: LI, SI, SI with VL -matched by LI (VLI-SI), and LI with VL-matched by SI (VSI-LI). A 3-minute rest interval was afforded in LI and VSI-LI protocols, while SI and VLI-SI employed a 1-minute interval. All subjects trained with a load corresponding to 80% 1RM. One repetition maximum and QCSA were measured before and after training. All protocols significantly increased 1RM values in post-training (p < 0.0001; LI: 27.6%, effect size [ES] = 0.90; VLI-SI: 31.1%, ES = 1.00; SI: 26.5%, ES = 1.11; and VSI-LI: 31.2%, ES = 1.28), with no significant differences between protocols. Quadriceps cross-sectional area increased significantly for all protocols in post-training (p < 0.0001). However, absolute changes in QCSA were significantly greater in LI and VLI-SI (13.1%, ES: 0.66 and 12.9%, ES: 0.63) than SI and VSI-LI (6.8%, ES: 0.38 and 6.6%, ES: 0.37) (both comparisons, p < 0.05). These data suggest that maintenance of high loads is more important for strength increases, while a greater VL plays a primary role for hypertrophy, regardless of interset rest interval.
Copyright © 2020 National Strength and Conditioning Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 35622106     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  3 in total

Review 1.  Manipulating Resistance Training Variables to Induce Muscle Strength and Hypertrophy: A Brief Narrative Review.

Authors:  Júlio Benvenutti Bueno DE Camargo; Felipe Alves Brigatto; Rafael Sakai Zaroni; Thiago Barbosa Trindade; Moisés Diego Germano; Antonio Carlos Tavares Junior; Thiago Pires DE Oliveira; Paulo Henrique Marchetti; Jonato Prestes; Charles Ricardo Lopes
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2022-07-01

2.  Tri-Set Training System Induces a High Muscle Swelling with Short Time Commitment in Resistance-Trained Subjects: A Cross-Over Study.

Authors:  Júlio B B DE Camargo; Rafael S Zaroni; Antônio C T Júnior; Thiago P DE Oliveira; Thiago B Trindade; Charles R Lopes; Felipe A Brigatto
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2022-04-01

3.  Effects of supervised high-intensity hardstyle kettlebell training on grip strength and health-related physical fitness in insufficiently active older adults: the BELL pragmatic controlled trial.

Authors:  Neil J Meigh; Justin W L Keogh; Ben Schram; Wayne Hing; Evelyne N Rathbone
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.070

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.