Literature DB >> 35621659

Sexual Functioning in Female Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment for Colorectal Cancer-A Single-Center, Prospective Triple Timepoint Yearly Follow-Up.

Magdalena Tarkowska1, Iwona Głowacka-Mrotek2, Bartosz Skonieczny3, Tomasz Nowikiewicz3, Michał Tarkowski4, Michał Jankowski3, Wojciech Zegarski3, Piotr Jarzemski1.   

Abstract

The study was aimed at assessing the quality of sexual functioning in female patients having undergone surgical treatment for cancer depending on the type of surgery. The prospective cohort consisted of 48 female patients (23 patients with stoma [A2] and 25 patients with maintained continuity of the GI tract [A1]). Study methods included a diagnostic survey and the analysis of medical records of patients. Research tools consisted of a standardized FSFI questionnaire and a proprietary form for evaluation of sociodemographic data. Measurements were performed at threetimepoints: On the day before the surgery (Measurement I) as well as six and 12 months after the surgery (Measurements II and III, respectively). Statistically significant differences in results were observed in Measurements II and III in the subscales of arousal (II:p = 0.0068, III:p = 0.0018), lubrication (II:p = 0.0221, III:p = 0.0134), orgasm (II:p = 0.0044, III:p = 0.0021), satisfaction (II:p = 0.0021, III:p = 0.0433), and pain/discomfort (II:p = 0.0343, III:p = 0.0473). In all cases, lower scores corresponding to lower quality of sexual functioning were observed in patients in whom stoma had been performed. Statistically significant differences in sexual functioning were observed at Measurements II and III in each group, with the results being significantly (p > 0.05) worse in patients having undergone Hartmann's procedure or abdominoperineal resection). Variables significantly affecting self-assessed sexual satisfaction included marital status, age, and modality of neoadjuvant treatment. Restoration of the continuity of the gastrointestinal tract is a chance for better self-assessment of the patient's quality of life as regards sexual functioning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colorectal cancer; quality of life; sexual functioning; stoma

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35621659      PMCID: PMC9139393          DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29050269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.109


  19 in total

1.  Quality of life outcomes in patients with anal cancer after combined radiochemotherapy.

Authors:  Grit Welzel; Verena Hägele; Frederik Wenz; Sabine Kathrin Mai
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 2.  A feminist perspective on sexuality and body image in females with colorectal cancer: an integrative review.

Authors:  Chia-Chun Li; Lynn Rew
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.741

Review 3.  Sexual (dys)function and the quality of sexual life in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  M J Traa; J De Vries; J A Roukema; B L Den Oudsten
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Risk factors for sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer treatment.

Authors:  M M Lange; C A M Marijnen; C P Maas; H Putter; H J Rutten; A M Stiggelbout; E Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg; C J H van de Velde
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Changes in sexuality and intimacy after the diagnosis and treatment of cancer: the experience of partners in a sexual relationship with a person with cancer.

Authors:  Yasmin Hawkins; Jane Ussher; Emilee Gilbert; Janette Perz; Mirjana Sandoval; Kendra Sundquist
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.592

6.  Impact of Androgens on Sexual Function in Women With Rectal Cancer - A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Annika Svanström Röjvall; Christian Buchli; Angelique Flöter Rådestad; Anna Martling; Josefin Segelman
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2021-07-18       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  Gender differences in mortality, quality of life and function after restorative procedures for rectal cancer.

Authors:  M Zutshi; T Hull; S Shedda; I Lavery; J Hammel
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 8.  Psychological aspects of patients with intestinal stoma: integrative review.

Authors:  Natália Michelato Silva; Manoel Antônio Dos Santos; Sara Rodrigues Rosado; Cristina Maria Galvão; Helena Megumi Sonobe
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2017-12-11

9.  Social support following diagnosis and treatment for colorectal cancer and associations with health-related quality of life: Results from the UK ColoREctal Wellbeing (CREW) cohort study.

Authors:  Joanne Haviland; Samantha Sodergren; Lynn Calman; Jessica Corner; Amy Din; Deborah Fenlon; Chloe Grimmett; Alison Richardson; Peter W Smith; Jane Winter; Claire Foster
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 10.  Biopsychosocial predictors of sexual function and quality of sexual life: a study among patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Marjan Johanna Traa; Jan Anne Roukema; Jolanda De Vries; Harm Jozef Theodorus Rutten; Barbara Langenhoff; Walther Jansen; Brenda Leontine Den Oudsten
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2015-04
View more
  1 in total

1.  Prospective Evaluation of the Quality of Life of Patients after Surgical Treatment of Rectal Cancer: A 12-Month Cohort Observation.

Authors:  Magdalena Tarkowska; Iwona Głowacka-Mrotek; Bartosz Skonieczny; Michał Jankowski; Tomasz Nowikiewicz; Marcin Jarzemski; Wojciech Zegarski; Piotr Jarzemski
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 4.964

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.