Literature DB >> 35621264

Motor cortex activity across movement speeds is predicted by network-level strategies for generating muscle activity.

Shreya Saxena1,2,3,4,5, Abigail A Russo2,6, John Cunningham2,3,4,5, Mark M Churchland2,3,6,7.   

Abstract

Learned movements can be skillfully performed at different paces. What neural strategies produce this flexibility? Can they be predicted and understood by network modeling? We trained monkeys to perform a cycling task at different speeds, and trained artificial recurrent networks to generate the empirical muscle-activity patterns. Network solutions reflected the principle that smooth well-behaved dynamics require low trajectory tangling. Network solutions had a consistent form, which yielded quantitative and qualitative predictions. To evaluate predictions, we analyzed motor cortex activity recorded during the same task. Responses supported the hypothesis that the dominant neural signals reflect not muscle activity, but network-level strategies for generating muscle activity. Single-neuron responses were better accounted for by network activity than by muscle activity. Similarly, neural population trajectories shared their organization not with muscle trajectories, but with network solutions. Thus, cortical activity could be understood based on the need to generate muscle activity via dynamics that allow smooth, robust control over movement speed.
© 2022, Saxena, Russo et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dynamical systems; motor cortex; movement; neural networks; neuroscience; rhesus macaque; speed; tangling

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35621264      PMCID: PMC9197394          DOI: 10.7554/eLife.67620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN: 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.713


  48 in total

1.  Descending systems translate transient cortical commands into a sustained muscle activation signal.

Authors:  Uri Shalit; Nofya Zinger; Mati Joshua; Yifat Prut
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Preference distributions of primary motor cortex neurons reflect control solutions optimized for limb biomechanics.

Authors:  Timothy P Lillicrap; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Discharges of pyramidal tract and other motor cortical neurones during locomotion in the cat.

Authors:  D M Armstrong; T Drew
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  A freely-moving monkey treadmill model.

Authors:  Justin D Foster; Paul Nuyujukian; Oren Freifeld; Hua Gao; Ross Walker; Stephen I Ryu; Teresa H Meng; Boris Murmann; Michael J Black; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  The role of the motor cortex in the control of vigour of locomotor movements in the cat.

Authors:  I N Beloozerova; M G Sirota
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Neural population dynamics during reaching.

Authors:  Mark M Churchland; John P Cunningham; Matthew T Kaufman; Justin D Foster; Paul Nuyujukian; Stephen I Ryu; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Context-dependent computation by recurrent dynamics in prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Valerio Mante; David Sussillo; Krishna V Shenoy; William T Newsome
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Neural Population Dynamics during Reaching Are Better Explained by a Dynamical System than Representational Tuning.

Authors:  Jonathan A Michaels; Benjamin Dann; Hansjörg Scherberger
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Cortical pattern generation during dexterous movement is input-driven.

Authors:  Britton A Sauerbrei; Jian-Zhong Guo; Jeremy D Cohen; Matteo Mischiati; Wendy Guo; Mayank Kabra; Nakul Verma; Brett Mensh; Kristin Branson; Adam W Hantman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Neural population dynamics in motor cortex are different for reach and grasp.

Authors:  Aneesha K Suresh; James M Goodman; Elizaveta V Okorokova; Matthew Kaufman; Nicholas G Hatsopoulos; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.