| Literature DB >> 35620472 |
David Fiebig1,2, Jan P Bogen1,2, Stefania C Carrara1,2, Lukas Deweid1,2, Stefan Zielonka1, Julius Grzeschik3, Björn Hock3, Harald Kolmar1,4.
Abstract
Yeast-surface display (YSD) is commonly applied to screen Fab immune or naïve libraries for binders of predefined target molecules. However, reformatting of isolated variants represents a time-intensive bottleneck. Herein, we present a novel approach to facilitate a lean transition from antibody screening using YSD Fab libraries to the production of full-length IgG antibodies in Expi293-F cells. In this study, utilizing Golden Gate Cloning (GGC) and a bidirectional promoter system, an exemplary Fab-displaying YSD library was generated based on immunised transgene rats. After subsequent screening for antigen-specific antibody candidates by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), the Fab-encoding genes were subcloned into a bidirectional mammalian expression vector, exhibiting CH2-CH3 encoding genes, in a GGC-mediated, PCR-free manner. This novel, straightforward and time-saving workflow allows the VH/VL pairing to be preserved. This study resulted in antibody variants exhibiting suitable biophysical properties and covered a broad VH diversity after two rounds of FACS screening, as revealed by NGS analysis. Ultimately, we demonstrate that the implication of such a gene transfer system streamlines antibody hit discovery efforts, allowing the faster characterisation of antibodies against a plethora of targets that may lead to new therapeutic agents.Entities:
Keywords: antibody hit discovery; bidirectional promoter; golden gate cloning; monoclonal antibodies; reformatting; yeast surface display
Year: 2022 PMID: 35620472 PMCID: PMC9127228 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.794389
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
FIGURE 1Overview of bulk reformatting workflow from YSD vector to the engineered mammalian destination (MD) vector. VH, heavy chain variable domain; VL, light chain variable domain; CLκ, light chain constant kappa domain; GGC, Golden Gate Cloning; YSD, yeast surface display; MD, mammalian destination; ORF, open reading frame; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting.
FIGURE 2Verification of proof-of-concept study using Durvalumab. (A) FACS contour plot showing the display of the Durvalumab Fab and its ability to bind biotinylated PD-L1 (blue) compared to the negative control without antigen (grey). Surface presentation was detected using an anti-kappa AlexaFluor647 antibody, while target binding was detected using streptavidin-PE. (B) Affinity determination of Durvalumab to PD-L1 after production in Expi293-F cells. 10 μg/ml antibody was loaded and associated to different PD-L1 concentrations.
FIGURE 3Sorting of the TAMR yeast library. Target binding to TAM-Receptor is depicted on the x-axis using either an anti-His AlexaFlour647-conjugated or anti-human IgG-PE conjugated antibody for either TAMR-His or TAMR-Fc, respectively. Surface presentation is shown on the y-axis as detected using a goat F (ab’)2 anti-human Kappa-AlexaFluor647 or -PE conjugate, respectively. 100’000 events are shown.
FIGURE 4Next generation sequencing results from the 2nd round of sorting. (A) Tree view of the VH and VL sequences after the second sorting round separated by VH and VL sequences. Tree maps were generated using Geneious Prime 2020.1.2. The colour-coding corresponds to the VH/VL sequences isolated in the 10 single clones depicted in B. (B) Representation of the found VH and VL in the 10 isolated clones. The rectangles represent the VH clusters, while the ovals represent the VL sequences. Colour-coding of the corresponding VH and VL pairs.
FIGURE 5Characterisation of single clones. (A) SEC profiles and (B) SDS-PAGE analysis under reducing conditions, showing the respective heavy (HC) and light (LC) chains at their anticipated molecular weights. The curves in (A) are nudged by 1 and 10 data units in the x- and y-axis, respectively. Colour-coding represents the different single clones identified.
Affinities of isolated TAMR antibodies determined by BLI measurements using His6-TAMR.
| Clone | Affinity ± S.D. (nM) |
|---|---|
| K9 | 43.10 ± 0.65 |
| K13 | 9.81 ± 0.20 |
| K15 | 8.23 ± 0.24 |
| K17 | 10.10 ± 0.21 |
| K22 | 12.50 ± 0.31 |
| K24 | 11.90 ± 0.31 |
| K26 | 7.94 ± 0.26 |
| K27 | 5.85 ± 0.22 |
| K28 | 11.10 ± 0.093 |