| Literature DB >> 35620402 |
Xiao-Long Yang1, Bei Luo2, Zhong-Xing Zhang1, Xiao-Feng Feng1, Feng Xu1.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of different doses of tranexamic acid plus traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in hip arthroplasty in diabetic patients and the effect on intraoperative hemorrhage and postoperative drainage.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35620402 PMCID: PMC9129970 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1197495
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.650
Comparison of general data of patients.
| Groups | Group A ( | Group B ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.161 | 0.688 | ||
| Male | 28 | 26 | ||
| Female | 22 | 24 | ||
| Mean age | 55.10 ± 3.56 | 55.20 ± 3.44 | 0.143 | 0.887 |
| Mean height | 175.65 ± 15.65 | 176.11 ± 15.40 | 0.148 | 0.883 |
| Mean weight (kg) | 60.65 ± 2.32 | 60.84 ± 2.40 | 0.402 | 0.688 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.77 ± 1.25 | 22.98 ± 1.33 | 0.814 | 0.418 |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | 124.98 ± 12.65 | 125.10 ± 12.55 | 0.048 | 0.962 |
| Erythrocyte volume (L/L) | 0.48 ± 0.03 | 0.49 ± 0.04 | 1.414 | 0.161 |
|
| ||||
| Left | 18 | 20 | 0.170 | 0.680 |
| Right | 20 | 19 | 0.042 | 0.838 |
| Both | 12 | 11 | 0.057 | 0.812 |
|
| ||||
| Married | 30 | 34 | 0.694 | 0.405 |
| Unmarried | 12 | 10 | 0.233 | 0.629 |
| Divorced/widowed | 8 | 6 | 0.332 | 0.564 |
| Place of residence | 0.040 | 0.841 | ||
| Urban | 28 | 27 | ||
| Rural | 22 | 23 | ||
|
| ||||
| Smoking | 24 | 20 | 0.649 | 0.420 |
| Drinking | 22 | 26 | 0.641 | 0.423 |
Figure 1Comparison of TBL, DBL, and HBL in patients (, ml). (a) The abscissa is group A and group B from left to right, and the ordinate is TBL (ml); # indicates P < 0.05. The TBL in group A was significantly less than that in group B (331.50 ± 77.01 vs. 496.12 ± 310.23, P < 0.05). (b) The abscissa is group A and group B from left to right, and the ordinate is DBL (ml); # indicates P < 0.05. The DBL in group A was significantly less than that in group B (254.33 ± 70.61 vs. 283.10 ± 70.25, t = 13.254, P < 0.05. (c) The abscissa is group A and group B from left to right, and the ordinate is HBL (ml); # indicates P < 0.05. The HBL in group A was significantly less than that in group B (30.11 ± 10.23 vs. 56.23 ± 15.65, P < 0.05).
Figure 2Comparison of postoperative APTT, PT, and INR of patients (, t/s). (a) The abscissa is group A and group B from left to right, and the ordinate is APTT (t/s). There was no statistical difference in APTT between the two groups (30.12 ± 0.05 vs. 30.45 ± 0.09, P > 0.05). (b) The abscissa is group A and group B from left to right, and the ordinate is PT (t/s). There was no statistical difference in PT between the two groups (9.23 ± 0.07 vs. 9.18 ± 0.08, P > 0.05). (c) The abscissa is group A and group B from left to right, and the ordinate is INR. There was no statistical difference in INR between the two groups (31.98 ± 4.65 vs. 31.00 ± 4.14, P > 0.05).
Comparison of postoperative drainage volume in patients (, ml).
| Groups | Group A ( | Group B ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 h | 182.65 ± 12.55 | 185.98 ± 15.65 | 1.174 | 0.243 |
| 24 h | 210.65 ± 23.65 | 215.22 ± 25.98 | 0.920 | 0.360 |
| 48 h | 289.65 ± 20.65 | 292.65 ± 30.55 | 0.575 | 0.566 |
| At extubation | 344.48 ± 23.65 | 350.65 ± 36.99 | 0.994 | 0.323 |