Literature DB >> 35620267

Not all P waves are equally created.

Xiaoxiao Qian1, Chirag Sandesara1,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35620267      PMCID: PMC9127549          DOI: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytac198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep        ISSN: 2514-2119


× No keyword cloud information.

Clinical vignette

A 69-year-old female was found to have an abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG) () in her cardiologist’s office. She reported no symptoms and specifically denied chest pain, shortness of breath, dizziness, lightheadedness, or syncope. Her vital signs on presentation were normal. She was recently hospitalized for an anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction and had a drug-eluting stent placed in the proximal left anterior descending artery. She also had ischaemic cardiomyopathy with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 44% based on echocardiography after stenting. Her medications were atorvastatin 80 mg daily, aspirin 81 mg daily, clopidogrel 75 mg daily, and metoprolol succinate 25 mg daily. Due to the ECG findings, she was started on apixaban 5 mg twice daily for stroke prophylaxis and her metoprolol succinate was held for the concern of heart block noted on the ECG. Presenting electrocardiogram. Questions: 1. What is the diagnosis? Complete heart block Atrial flutter with 3:1 conduction Atrial tachycardia with slow ventricular conduction Ectopic atrial bradycardia Atrial fibrillation with slow ventricular conduction Answer: The correct answer is (D). On this ECG, there is a unifocal P wave preceding each QRS complex suggesting unifocal atrial activation. There are additional P waves with multiple morphologies and variable PP intervals seen as well. The additional P waves (blue arrows) before the P waves of 4th and 5th QRS complexes (red arrows) have PP intervals shorter than atrial refractory period indicating a non-physiological cause. These P waves are absent on lead III confirming artefacts. Lead III shows inverted P waves suggesting possible ectopic focus, and this rules out atrial flutter. Repeat ECG is shown in Supplementary material online, . 2. All the following conditions can cause artefacts mimicking atrial arrhythmia except which one? Equipment-related artefact Muscle contraction Parkinson’s disease Hypothermia Limb leads misplacement Answer: The correct answer is (E). Artefacts that can mimic atrial arrhythmia include muscle contraction, Parkinson’s disease, other causes of tremors, shivering from hypothermia, as well as equipment-related artefacts.[1-3] Artefacts caused by tremors and shivering usually mimic atrial fibrillation and less frequently atrial flutter. Muscle contraction produces electrical signals that represent muscle action potentials and these electromyographic signals can be recorded by ECG imitating P waves.[4] The absence of artefacts on certain lead can assist in the diagnosis of artefacts as well as localizing the artefact source. Limb lead misplacement may cause inverted P wave, QRS complex, and T wave but not additional P waves. 3. What should be the management for this patient? Continue apixaban and metoprolol succinate at the same dose Continue apixaban and decrease metoprolol succinate dose Discontinue apixaban and continue metoprolol succinate at same dose Discontinue apixaban and decrease metoprolol succinate dose Discontinue both apixaban and metoprolol succinate Answer: The correct answer is (D). The ECG did not show atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter; thus, patient has no indication to use apixaban for stroke prophylaxis. Given patient’s recent STEMI and ischaemic cardiomyopathy with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, metoprolol succinate is indicated; however, her ECGs showed bradycardia with heart rate in 40 s, thus, her metoprolol dose should be decreased. Click here for additional data file.
  4 in total

Review 1.  Equipment-related electrocardiographic artifacts: causes, characteristics, consequences, and correction.

Authors:  Santosh I Patel; Michael J Souter
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Electrocardiographic artifact potentially misleading to the wrong management.

Authors:  Srishti Sareen; Mannu Nayyar; Brian Wheeler; Michelle Skelton; Rami N Khouzam
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-01

Review 3.  Main artifacts in electrocardiography.

Authors:  Andrés Ricardo Pérez-Riera; Raimundo Barbosa-Barros; Rodrigo Daminello-Raimundo; Luiz Carlos de Abreu
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 4.  Surface electromyography signal processing and classification techniques.

Authors:  Rubana H Chowdhury; Mamun B I Reaz; Mohd Alauddin Bin Mohd Ali; Ashrif A A Bakar; K Chellappan; T G Chang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.576

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.