| Literature DB >> 35620123 |
Ryan M Sanborn1, Andrea S Bauer1,2, Patricia E Miller1, Dennis E Kramer1,2, Collin J May1,2, Carley B Vuillermin1,2, Yi-Meng Yen1,2.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to quantify the anxiety experienced by patients undergoing pin removal in clinic following closed reduction and percutaneous pinning for supracondylar humerus fractures.Entities:
Keywords: Activity; Cry; Face; Legs; Pin removal; and Consolability; anxiety; fracture; heart rate; implant; pediatrics; supracondylar; trauma
Year: 2022 PMID: 35620123 PMCID: PMC9127883 DOI: 10.1177/18632521221087174
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Child Orthop ISSN: 1863-2521 Impact factor: 1.917
Figure 1.Consort diagram detailing enrollment and collected patient measures.
Cohort summary (n = 53).
| Characteristic | Freq. | (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Age ( | 5.9 | ±1.43 |
| Sex ( | 26 | (49%) |
| BMI percentile ( | 57 | (44–85) |
| BMI percentile category | ||
| Healthy weight | 26 | (49%) |
| Overweight | 10 | (19%) |
| Unknown | 17 | (32%) |
| Race | ||
| White | 43 | (81%) |
| Black | 2 | (4%) |
| Asian | 1 | (2%) |
| American Indian | 1 | (2%) |
| More than one race | 3 | (6%) |
| Other/unknown | 3 | (6%) |
| Ethnicity | ||
| Hispanic | 5 | (9%) |
| Not Hispanic | 48 | (91%) |
| Dominant hand (% right) | 43 | (81%) |
| Injured side (% right) | 22 | (42%) |
| History of fracture | 12 | (23%) |
| Mechanism of injury | ||
| Fall from height | 30 | (57%) |
| Fall from standing | 12 | (23%) |
| Motor vehicle accident | 1 | (2%) |
| Sport | 3 | (6%) |
| Other | 7 | (13%) |
SD: standard deviation; BMI: body mass index.
Outcome summary by time point.
| Outcome | Control ( | Prior to pin removal ( | After pin removal ( |
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | (IQR) | Median | (IQR) | Median | (IQR) | ||||
| FLACC scale score | 0 | (0–0) | 7 | (6–8) | 2 | (0–3) | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
| FLACC > 0 ( | 0 | (0%) | 52 | (100%) | 8 | (15%) | – | – | – |
| Outcome | Control | Prior to pin removal | After pin removal |
|
|
| |||
| Mean | ±SD | Mean | ±SD | Mean | ±SD | ||||
| Heart rate ( | 89.7 | ±12.97 | 119.4 | ±18.0 | 94.1 | ±17.22 | < 0.001 | 0.20 | < 0.001 |
| Elevated HR ( | 25 | (56%) | 47 | (98%) | 30 | (61%) | < 0.001 | 0.52 | < 0.001 |
IQR: interquartile range; FLACC: Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability; SD: standard deviation; HR: heart rate.
p values are based on tests in the change in outcome from prior to pin removal to after pin removal.
p values are based on tests in the change in outcome between control and after pin removal.
p values are based on tests in the change in outcome between control and prior pin removal.
Outcomes by sex and age groups.
| FLACC scale score | Females ( | Males ( |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | (IQR) | Median | (IQR) | ||
| Control | 0 | (0–0) | 0 | (0–0) | – |
| Prior to pin removal | 8 | (6–8) | 7 | (6–7) | 0.08 |
| After pin removal | 2 | (1–3) | 1 | (0–4) | 0.20 |
| Heart rate ( | Mean | SD | Mean | SD |
|
| Control | 91.6 | ±10.47 | 87.8 | ±15.17 | 0.34 |
| Prior to pin removal | 122.3 | ±16.07 | 116.5 | ±19.64 | 0.26 |
| After pin removal | 97.2 | ±16.83 | 91.0 | ±17.38 | 0.21 |
| FLACC scale score | Age ≤ 6 ( | Age > 6 ( |
| ||
| Median | (IQR) | Median | (IQR) | ||
| Control | 0 | (0–0) | 0 | (0–0) | – |
| Prior to pin removal | 7 | (6–8) | 7 | (5–8) | 0.36 |
| After pin removal | 2 | (1–4) | 1 | (0–3) | 0.12 |
| Heart rate ( | Mean | SD | Mean | SD |
|
| Control | 90.8 | ±13.82 | 88.3 | ±11.92 | 0.51 |
| Prior to pin removal | 121.0 | ±17.45 | 117.4 | ±18.92 | 0.51 |
| After pin removal | 94.6 | ±17.08 | 93.5 | ±17.80 | 0.82 |
FLACC: Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability; IQR: interquartile range; SD: standard deviation.